Suppr超能文献

比较三种治疗方法治疗锁骨中段骨折的效果:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparison of 3 treatment methods for midshaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Hand Surgery, Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, China.

Department of Hand Surgery, Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, China.

出版信息

Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):1765-1776. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to evaluate the fracture nonunion rate and the functional score of plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing and non-surgical treatment in midshaft clavicle fractures patients using a network meta-analysis of data from clinical randomized controlled trials.

MATERIAL/METHODS: The studies were abstracted from Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

24 randomized controlled trials involving 2161 participants were included. The studies were published between 2007 and 2019. A total of 3 treatment methods-plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing and non-surgical treatment- were included in the literature. The treatments were ranked based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability. In terms of the constant score, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment. In terms of the DASH index, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment. In terms of the nonunion rate, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Non-surgical treatment has a high rate of nonunion for clavicular fractures with obvious displacement and notable comminution. Surgical treatment reduces the nonunion rate leads to better functional scores at long-term follow-up, although there may be no significant clinical differences. The fracture nonunion rate of plate screw fixation group and intramedullary nail group was low and the functional prognosis was similar. More RCTs focused on clavicular fractures are needed to further substantiate this conclusion.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过对临床随机对照试验数据的网络荟萃分析,评估锁骨中段骨折患者采用钢板螺钉固定、髓内钉和非手术治疗的骨折不愈合率和功能评分。

材料/方法:从 Medline、Embase、Web of Science、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中提取研究。选择符合纳入和排除标准的 RCT。使用 Stata 软件(Stata Corporation,德克萨斯州 College Station)进行统计分析,版本 14.0。

结果

共纳入 24 项随机对照试验,涉及 2161 名患者。这些研究发表于 2007 年至 2019 年。文献中总共纳入了 3 种治疗方法——钢板螺钉固定、髓内钉和非手术治疗。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)概率对治疗方法进行排序。在固定评分方面,治疗方法的排序如下:髓内钉、钢板螺钉固定和非手术治疗。在 DASH 指数方面,治疗方法的排序如下:髓内钉、钢板螺钉固定和非手术治疗。在不愈合率方面,治疗方法的排序如下:髓内钉、钢板螺钉固定和非手术治疗。

结论

对于明显移位和明显粉碎的锁骨骨折,非手术治疗的不愈合率较高。手术治疗可降低不愈合率,长期随访时功能评分更好,但可能无明显临床差异。钢板螺钉固定组和髓内钉组的骨折不愈合率较低,功能预后相似。需要更多针对锁骨骨折的 RCT 来进一步证实这一结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验