West Julianna, Chan Hei Kit, Wang Henry, Molony Donald, Foringer John, Huebinger Ryan, Robinson David, Chavez Summer
McGovern Medical School The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
Department of Biostatistics School of Public Health The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Apr 19;3(2):e12698. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12698. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Many uninsured patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) depend upon the emergency department (ED) for hemodialysis (HD). We sought to characterize ED visits for emergent HD by insurance status.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2017 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, including ED visits by patients ≥18 years old with a length of stay ≤1 day and performance of HD. Insurance status determined by "insured" as Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial and "uninsured" as self-pay or charity.
Of 118,034,396 adult ED visits, 235,988 were associated with HD: uninsured 62,503 (incidence 5.30 per 10,000, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.26-5.34) and insured 172,889 (incidence 14.65 per 10,000, 95% CI: 14.60-14.74). The south census region accounted for 89% of uninsured ED HD (odds ratio [OR] 31.55, 95% CI: 8.97-110.97). Compared to insured patients, uninsured ED HD patients were more likely to be younger (age 18-44, 37.6% vs 19.9%). The most common primary diagnosis for uninsured and insured ED HD patients was hypertensive chronic kidney disease (34.6% and 26.2%, respectively). Uninsured ED HD patients were less likely to be admitted (3.4% vs 36.0%, OR 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02-0.20). Most ED HD patients were discharged home (95.2% uninsured vs 57.6% insured). ED charges per visit were $5,992.32 for uninsured and $10,985.87 for insured ED HD patients.
Our findings highlight the health care burden of ED HD. Novel system approaches are needed for the management of uninsured and insured patients with ESKD.
许多未参保的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者依靠急诊科(ED)进行血液透析(HD)。我们试图按保险状况对急诊血液透析的就诊情况进行特征描述。
我们对2017年全国急诊科样本进行了横断面分析,包括年龄≥18岁、住院时间≤1天且进行了血液透析的患者的急诊就诊情况。保险状况分为“参保”(医疗保险、医疗补助或商业保险)和“未参保”(自费或慈善救助)。
在118,034,396例成人急诊就诊病例中,235,988例与血液透析有关:未参保者62,503例(发病率为每10,000人中有5.30例,95%置信区间[CI]:5.26 - 5.34),参保者172,889例(发病率为每10,000人中有14.65例,95%CI:14.60 - 14.74)。南部普查地区占未参保急诊血液透析病例的89%(比值比[OR]31.55,95%CI:8.97 - 110.97)。与参保患者相比,未参保的急诊血液透析患者更可能较年轻(18 - 44岁,分别为37.6%和19.9%)。未参保和参保的急诊血液透析患者最常见的主要诊断是高血压慢性肾病(分别为34.6%和26.2%)。未参保的急诊血液透析患者入院的可能性较小(3.4%对36.0%,OR 0.06,95%CI:0.02 - 0.20)。大多数急诊血液透析患者出院回家(未参保者为95.2%,参保者为57.6%)。未参保的急诊血液透析患者每次就诊的急诊费用为5,992.32美元,参保的急诊血液透析患者为10,985.87美元。
我们的研究结果凸显了急诊血液透析的医疗负担。需要新系统方法来管理未参保和参保的终末期肾病患者。