Wright Emily A, Wiedmeier Rachael C, Roberts Emma K, Pipkin David R, Hernández Froylán, Bayouth Joseph P, Conway Warren C, Bradley Robert D
Department of Biological Sciences Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas USA.
Climate Sciences Center Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas USA.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e8849. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8849. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Translocation records indicate aoudad () populations in the United States are a product of multiple human-mediated introductions. Two mitochondrial markers (cytochrome , cytb; displacement loop, D loop) and one nuclear gene (prion protein gene exon 3, ) were used to determine: (1) genetic variation, (2) if genetic units correspond to taxonomic designations, (3) the number and geographic origin of translocations, and (4) divergence times. Three phylogenetic analyses (Bayesian inference, maximum likelihood, and parsimony) produced similar topologies with two clades (I and II). Clade I contained progeny of individuals resulting from introductions to Texas and Spain, and individuals from Algeria. Individuals in Clade II were progeny of past introductions to the United States and Europe, and northern Algeria. Clade II was subdivided into two subclades (A and B) representing two haplogroups. No genetic variation was detected in the sequences. Three haplogroups appeared to correspond to the subspecies and whose native distribution includes northwestern Africa. Network analyses assigned haplogroups to two major groups similar to those depicted in the phylogenetic analyses. Genetic distances ranged from 0.80% to 5.17% and 2.99% to 15.42% for cytb and D loop, respectively; and were higher than normally recovered for caprids, warranting a reexamination of subspecific status. Divergence dates indicated a major split between and circa 2.38 mya. Together, the high level of genetic divergences among US populations and apparent presence of two subspecies of aoudad in the United States support the hypothesis of multiple introductions from multiple sources.
迁移记录表明,美国的旋角大羚羊()种群是多次人为引入的产物。使用两个线粒体标记(细胞色素,cytb;置换环,D环)和一个核基因(朊病毒蛋白基因外显子3,)来确定:(1)遗传变异;(2)遗传单元是否与分类学名称相对应;(3)迁移的数量和地理来源;以及(4)分歧时间。三种系统发育分析(贝叶斯推断、最大似然法和简约法)产生了相似的拓扑结构,有两个进化枝(I和II)。进化枝I包含了引入到得克萨斯州和西班牙的个体以及来自阿尔及利亚的个体的后代。进化枝II中的个体是过去引入到美国和欧洲以及阿尔及利亚北部的个体的后代。进化枝II又细分为两个亚进化枝(A和B),代表两个单倍群。在序列中未检测到遗传变异。三个单倍群似乎对应于原生分布包括非洲西北部的亚种和。网络分析将单倍群归为两个主要组,与系统发育分析中描绘的组相似。细胞色素b和D环的遗传距离分别为0.80%至5.17%和2.99%至15.42%;高于通常在山羊族中发现的水平,这值得重新审视亚种地位。分歧日期表明和大约在238万年前发生了一次主要分化。总之,美国种群之间高度的遗传分歧以及美国明显存在两种旋角大羚羊亚种,支持了从多个来源多次引入的假设。