Reduced Incidence of Perioperative Periprosthetic Fractures Using Hybrid Rasp-Impaction Broaching Over Impaction Broaching When Using the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND

A not infrequent complication encountered with the direct anterior approach is perioperative fracture. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of perioperative fractures using a hybrid rasp-impaction broach vs an impaction broach for a similarly designed stem.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 798 primary total hip replacements by 1 surgeon performed using noncollared dual tapered femoral stems, including 457 implanted using hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 341 implanted using impaction broaching. Intraoperative and 90-day postoperative fractures were identified in each group. Bivariate tests and multivariate regression analysis were used to compare the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were 33 (4.1%) fractures in the sample, 13 (2.8%) with hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 20 (5.8%) with impaction broaching ( = .034). Three (0.7%) intraoperative fractures occurred with hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 12 (3.5%) with impaction broaching ( = .003). Five (1.1%) total calcar fractures occurred with hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 11 (3.2%) with impaction broaching ( = .034). Intraoperative calcar fractures occurred with 1 (0.2%) hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 6 (1.8%) impaction broaching ( = .021). In multivariate analyses, hybrid rasp-impaction broaching had a statistically lower odds ratio (OR) for total fracture (OR 0.45 [0.22 to 0.93]); total intraoperative fracture (OR 0.17 [0.05 to 0.60]); total calcar fracture (OR 0.33 [0.11 to 0.97]); intraoperative calcar fracture (OR 0.11 [0.01 to 0.98]); and rate of readmission (OR 0.27 [0.10 to 0.78]).

CONCLUSION

The use of a hybrid rasp-impaction broach compared with impaction broach led to a reduced incidence of periprosthetic fractures when using a dual tapered stem through the direct anterior approach.