• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术中两种不同股骨假体设计的术后股骨假体周围骨折的发生率。

Prevalence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Between Two Different Femoral Component Designs Used in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Department of Orthopaedics, Bluegrass Orthopaedics, Lexington, KY.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3074-3079. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.061. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.061
PMID:31383495
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femur fractures are a well-documented complication following direct anterior uncemented total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare the prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures between 2 different femoral component designs used in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Beginning in February 2015, a single fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon performed 361 consecutive direct anterior total hip replacements using a flat, single-taper, wedged femoral implant. In June 2016, that same surgeon, using the exact same surgical technique and postoperative weight-bearing protocol, began using a dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant for 789 consecutive hips. The patients were carefully monitored for 3 months after surgery to identify the frequency of periprosthetic femur fractures. A Fisher's exact test was used to determine if the prevalence of periprosthetic femur fractures differed between the 2 implant designs.

RESULTS

Five of 361 (1.4%) patients sustained proximal femur fractures at an average of 19.6 days postoperatively in the first group, all demonstrating a Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture and requiring femoral revision. No patients (0/789, 0%) in the second cohort sustained a postoperative, periprosthetic fracture (P = .006).

CONCLUSION

In this comparison of 2 consecutive cohorts, the dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant had a statistically significant lower postoperative periprosthetic fracture rate than a flat, single-taper, wedged design.

摘要

背景

假体周围股骨骨折是直接前侧非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后一种有据可查的并发症。本研究的目的是比较两种不同股骨假体设计在直接前侧全髋关节置换术中术后假体周围股骨骨折的发生率。

方法

从 2015 年 2 月开始,一位接受过 fellowship 培训的成人重建外科医生使用平的、单斜面、楔形股骨植入物进行了 361 例连续的直接前侧全髋关节置换术。2016 年 6 月,同一位外科医生使用完全相同的手术技术和术后负重方案,开始为 789 例连续髋关节使用双斜面、羟基磷灰石涂层植入物。术后 3 个月内对患者进行仔细监测,以确定假体周围股骨骨折的频率。Fisher 确切概率检验用于确定两种植入物设计之间假体周围股骨骨折的发生率是否存在差异。

结果

第一组 361 例患者中有 5 例(1.4%)在术后 19.6 天发生近端股骨骨折,均表现为温哥华 B2 型假体周围骨折,需要进行股骨翻修。第二组无患者(0/789,0%)发生术后假体周围骨折(P =.006)。

结论

在这两组连续队列的比较中,双斜面、羟基磷灰石涂层植入物的术后假体周围骨折发生率明显低于平的、单斜面、楔形设计。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Between Two Different Femoral Component Designs Used in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术中两种不同股骨假体设计的术后股骨假体周围骨折的发生率。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3074-3079. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.061. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
2
Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.与一种独特的非骨水泥型股骨柄设计相关的假体周围股骨骨折风险增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2045-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
3
Direct Anterior Approach and Perioperative Fracture With a Single-Taper Wedge Femoral Component.直接前入路和使用单斜面楔形股骨部件的围手术期骨折。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study.髋关节置换术中单柄假体周围股骨骨折的发生率、分类及危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1400-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
5
Cumulative Long-Term Incidence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Hip Stem: 26- to 32-Year Results.使用非骨水泥锥形钛合金髋关节柄的累积长期术后股骨假体周围骨折发生率:26 至 32 年的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
6
Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty-a multicentric analysis.假体周围股骨骨折作为短柄髋关节置换术后早期翻修的原因——一项多中心分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Sep;42(9):2069-2076. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3930-y. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
7
Periprosthetic fractures of the femur in primary total hip arthroplasty: a New Zealand Joint Registry analysis.初次全髋关节置换术中股骨假体周围骨折:一项新西兰关节登记处分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Mar;91(3):404-408. doi: 10.1111/ans.16611. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Risk Factors for Perioperative Femoral Fractures: Cementless Femoral Implants and the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Fracture Table.围手术期股骨骨折的危险因素:非骨水泥型股骨植入物及使用骨折手术台的直接前路入路
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):2013-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.045. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
9
Cementless Tapered-Wedge Stem Length Affects the Risk of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.非骨水泥锥形楔形柄长度影响直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):805-809. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.065. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
10
High incidence of stem loosening in association with periprosthetic femur fractures in previously well-fixed cementless grit-blasted tapered-wedge stems.在先前固定良好的非骨水泥喷砂处理的锥形楔形柄假体周围股骨骨折中,柄松动的发生率较高。
Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1689-93. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2586-5. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiographic Performance of a Novel Femoral Stem Design.一种新型股骨柄设计的影像学表现。
Iowa Orthop J. 2025;45(1):113-120.
2
Recognition and Recurrence of Aneurysmal Bone Cyst Secondary to Giant Cell Tumor: A Case Series and Review Of The Literature.继发于骨巨细胞瘤的动脉瘤样骨囊肿的识别与复发:病例系列及文献复习
Iowa Orthop J. 2025;45(1):121-125.
3
Periprosthetic femoral fractures in minimally-invasive anterolateral short stem versus transgluteal straight stem cementless total hip arthroplasty: What are the differences in the femoral and pelvic morphology?
微创前外侧短柄与经臀直柄非骨水泥全髋关节置换术中的假体周围股骨骨折:股骨和骨盆形态有哪些差异?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05502-y.
4
[Risk factors and prevention strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty].[髋关节置换术中股骨假体周围骨折的危险因素及预防策略]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;53(12):966-973. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04566-8. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
5
Five-Year Survivorship of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Proximally Coated, Medially Collared, Triple-Tapered Femoral Stem: A Retrospective, Multicenter Registry Review.采用近端涂层、内侧带颈圈、三锥度股骨柄的全髋关节置换术的5年生存率:一项回顾性多中心登记研究。
Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59462. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59462. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Reduced Incidence of Perioperative Periprosthetic Fractures Using Hybrid Rasp-Impaction Broaching Over Impaction Broaching When Using the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术采用直接前路入路时,与冲击式扩髓相比,使用混合式锉刀-冲击式扩髓可降低围手术期假体周围骨折的发生率。
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Apr 12;15:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.02.030. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.股骨假体周围近端骨折的分类之争:温哥华与统一分类系统(UCS)——一项系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 23;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05240-w.
8
Periprosthetic fracture as a late mode of failure of the Anatomique Benoist Girard II femoral prosthesis.Anatomique Benoist Girard II 股骨假体的晚期失效模式为假体周围骨折。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1165-1170. doi: 10.1111/ans.17547. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
9
Varus malalignment of short femoral stem not associated with post-hip arthroplasty fracture.短柄股骨假体对线不良与髋关节置换术后骨折无关。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3533-3538. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04244-w. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Radiological Outcomes and Bone Remodeling Outcomes Between Proximal Coated Single-Wedge New Stem and Full Coated Dual-Wedge Classic Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.一期双侧全髋关节置换术中近端涂层单楔形新柄与全涂层双楔形经典柄的临床、影像学和骨重塑结果比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jan 31;26:e921847. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921847.