• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单层与双层肠吻合术的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis.

作者信息

Singh Rommel, Najmi Husain I, Chahal Reetinder K, Nikhil Dehankar

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College (GMC) and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Mar 12;14(3):e23088. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23088. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.23088
PMID:35464566
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8996431/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intestinal perforations requiring resection anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the formation and closure of temporary intestinal stoma are prevalent worldwide. This prospective comparative study was done to assess the efficacy and safety of single-layered anastomosis compared to a double-layered anastomosis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis with either of these two techniques were observed prospectively for various outcome parameters like time taken for anastomosis, and that for entire surgery, postoperative complications, etc. Data obtained were analyzed for statistical significance by applying the chi-square test and student's "t-test."

RESULTS

Duration for fashioning the anastomosis was significantly lesser for a single layer anastomosis than double (mean [±SD] for single layer was 19.57 ± 2.25 minutes and for double layer group was 30 ± 2.59 minutes, p=0.002). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. The postoperative incomplete intestinal obstruction was reported in three cases of the double layer group.

CONCLUSION

Single-layered gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) resulted in a significant reduction in time, without any difference in complications. Additionally, it is easier to train surgical residents in the single-layered technique which is particularly important in the setting of a teaching institute and can be recommended for intestinal anastomosis.

摘要

背景

需要进行胃肠道切除吻合术或临时肠造口的形成与闭合的肠穿孔在全球范围内都很常见。本前瞻性比较研究旨在评估单层吻合术与双层吻合术相比的疗效和安全性。

方法

对采用这两种技术之一进行肠吻合术的患者进行前瞻性观察,观察吻合时间、整个手术时间、术后并发症等各种结局参数。通过应用卡方检验和学生“t检验”对获得的数据进行统计学意义分析。

结果

单层吻合术构建吻合口的时间明显短于双层吻合术(单层的平均[±标准差]为19.57±2.25分钟,双层组为30±2.59分钟,p=0.002)。两组术后并发症无统计学差异。双层组有3例报告术后不完全性肠梗阻。

结论

单层胃肠道吻合术(GIA)可显著缩短时间,且并发症无差异。此外,单层技术更容易培训外科住院医师,这在教学机构环境中尤为重要,可推荐用于肠吻合术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8996431/99bb2ddb4cd6/cureus-0014-00000023088-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8996431/99bb2ddb4cd6/cureus-0014-00000023088-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8996431/99bb2ddb4cd6/cureus-0014-00000023088-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis.单层与双层肠吻合术的比较研究
Cureus. 2022 Mar 12;14(3):e23088. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23088. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Single Layered Versus Double Layered Intestinal Anastomosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.单层与双层肠吻合术:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):PC01-PC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24817.9983. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
Single layered intestinal anastomosis: a safe and economic technique.单层肠吻合术:一种安全且经济的技术。
Indian J Surg. 2013 Aug;75(4):290-3. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0487-7. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
4
Efficacy of single layered intestinal anastomosis over double layered intestinal anastomosis-an open labelled, randomized controlled trial.单层肠吻合术优于双层肠吻合术:一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.066. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
Single layer versus double layer suture anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract.胃肠道单层与双层缝合吻合术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD005477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005477.pub4.
6
[Safety analysis of definitive surgery for chronic radiation intestinal injury].[慢性放射性肠损伤确定性手术的安全性分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 25;24(11):969-976. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210814-00330.
7
[Analysis on operational safety of chronic radiation intestinal injury].[慢性放射性肠损伤的手术安全性分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 25;22(11):1034-1040. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.11.006.
8
Gastroesophageal anastomosis: single-layer versus double-layer technique--an experience on 50 cases.胃食管吻合术:单层与双层技术——50例经验
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):6-9.
9
[Safety of two and a half layered esophagojejunal anastomosis in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[两层半食管空肠吻合术在胃癌全胃切除术中的安全性]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 25;23(10):969-975. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20191010-00445.
10
A retrospective study comparing the outcome of horses undergoing small intestinal resection and anastomosis with a single layer (Lembert) or double layer (simple continuous and Cushing) technique.一项回顾性研究,比较采用单层(伦伯特缝合法)或双层(单纯连续缝合法和库欣缝合法)技术进行小肠切除吻合术的马匹的预后。
Vet Surg. 2014 May;43(4):471-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12143.x. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Layer or Double-Layer Intestinal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.单层或双层肠吻合术:随机对照试验的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 8;15(10):e46697. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46697. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Asymmetric figure-of-eight single-layer suture technique for intestinal anastomosis: A preliminary study.用于肠吻合术的不对称8字形单层缝合技术:一项初步研究。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 13;10:1109751. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1109751. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Single layer versus double layer suture anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract.胃肠道单层与双层缝合吻合术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD005477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005477.pub4.
2
Single- versus two- layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单层与双层肠吻合术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2006 Jan 27;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-6-2.
3
[Milestones in the history of intestinal anastomosis].[肠道吻合术历史上的里程碑]
Swiss Surg. 2003;9(3):99-104. doi: 10.1024/1023-9332.9.3.99.
4
Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial.单层连续与双层间断肠吻合术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2000 Jun;231(6):832-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200006000-00007.
5
A view of the development of intestinal suture. Part II. Principles and techniques.肠缝合术的发展概况。第二部分。原则与技术。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1990 May;60(5):377-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1990.tb07388.x.
6
A view of the development of intestinal suture. Part I. From legend to practice.肠缝合术的发展历程。第一部分。从传说到实践。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1990 Apr;60(4):299-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1990.tb07371.x.