Hadley Christopher J, Rao Somnath, Tjoumakaris Fotios P, Ciccotti Michael G, Dodson Christopher C, Marchetto Paul A, Hammoud Sommer, Cohen Steven B, Freedman Kevin B
The Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Apr 18;10(4):23259671221090412. doi: 10.1177/23259671221090412. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Questions remain regarding the traditional protocols used in rehabilitation and clearance for return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the impact on injury rates after return to sports by developing and validating a Safer Return to Play Following ACL Reconstruction Checklist consisting of subjective and objective functional tests that can be quickly and easily implemented into a sports medicine practice. It was hypothesized that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to sports would experience lower rates of ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries at a 2-year follow-up as compared with patients who returned to play before completing the checklist.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
First, a systematic review was performed to generate a list of the most common outcome measures used to assess return to play after ACLR. To refine our checklist, we conducted a survey with an expert panel of 10 medical professionals utilizing the Delphi technique. After the creation of the checklist, validation was performed by prospectively evaluating patients who had undergone ACLR for injury of the ipsilateral or contralateral knee, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
After our systematic review of 60 studies, 7 criteria were included in the final checklist. During the period studied, October 2014 to December 2017, a total of 222 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. At a minimum 2 years of follow-up, there were 146 patients who successfully passed the checklist and 38 who did not. Overall, 24 (16.4%) patients who had passed the checklist sustained an injury to either knee, as compared with 10 (26.3%) from the group that did not pass the checklist ( = .162). Of the group that passed the checklist, 8 (5.5%) patients sustained an injury to the ipsilateral knee, as compared with 7 (18.4%) in the group that did not pass ( = .017).
Prospective validation of our checklist demonstrated that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to play experienced a significantly lower incidence of ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury as compared with patients who did not pass the checklist.
关于前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后康复及恢复运动的传统方案仍存在疑问。
目的/假设:通过制定并验证一份《ACLR后更安全重返运动检查表》来研究其对恢复运动后损伤率的影响,该检查表包含主观和客观功能测试,可快速简便地应用于运动医学实践。假设与在完成检查表前恢复运动的患者相比,在恢复运动前成功通过检查表的患者在2年随访时同侧和对侧膝关节损伤率更低。
队列研究;证据等级,2级。
首先,进行系统评价以生成用于评估ACLR后恢复运动的最常见结局指标清单。为完善检查表,我们采用德尔菲技术对由10名医学专业人员组成的专家小组进行了一项调查。创建检查表后,通过对接受ACLR的患者进行前瞻性评估,对同侧或对侧膝关节损伤情况进行至少2年的随访,以进行验证。
在对60项研究进行系统评价后,最终检查表纳入了7项标准。在2014年10月至2017年12月的研究期间,共有222例患者符合纳入标准并纳入研究。在至少2年的随访中,有146例患者成功通过检查表,38例未通过。总体而言,通过检查表的患者中有24例(16.4%)膝关节受伤,而未通过检查表的患者中有10例(26.3%)(P = 0.162)。在通过检查表的组中,有8例(5.5%)患者同侧膝关节受伤,而未通过组中有7例(18.4%)(P = 0.017)。
对我们检查表的前瞻性验证表明,与未通过检查表的患者相比,在恢复运动前成功通过检查表的患者同侧前交叉韧带损伤发生率显著更低。