Krahn Aubrey N, Monson Jill K, LaPrade Robert F, Eggleston Garrett G, Greufe Nicole A
Physical Therapy Twin Cities Orthopedics.
Orthopedic Surgeon Twin Cities Orthopedics.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):885-891. doi: 10.26603/001c.138312. eCollection 2025.
Thigh circumference is a commonly gathered clinical data point intended to measure muscular atrophy. However, there is limited research examining whether thigh bulk, as observed through circumferential limb measurement, is meaningfully associated with quadriceps muscle strength.
To retrospectively assess if a correlation exists between side-to-side difference (SSD) of thigh bulk and limb symmetry index (LSI) with quadriceps isometric strength testing.
A retrospective, case control study.
Sixty-seven patients who underwent ligamentous reconstruction completed testing during a six-month post-operative follow-up visit (6.47 +/- 0.79 month). Testing included both clinical and strength measurements. Clinical measurements included side to side thigh bulk circumference difference (SSD) and strength testing included calculated quadriceps strength limb symmetry index (LSI) obtained from isometric testing at 90 degrees of knee flexion performed on an isokinetic dynamometer. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationships between variables.
The principal findings were a mean thigh circumference difference of 2.53 + 1.54 cm and mean quadriceps LSI at time of testing of 66.88 + 16.93%. A moderate, positive relationship was found between thigh circumference difference and the quadriceps LSI (r= 0.36, r2= 0.13, p = 0.003).
A moderate positive correlation between circumference and isometric strength exists that may help clinicians monitor strength differences side to side. Thigh circumference only accounts for approximately ~13% of all factors that influence quadriceps LSI, therefore it is appropriate to incorporate a battery of different tests and measures to properly assess muscular strength following knee surgery.
Level 3 Evidence.
大腿围是临床常用的测量肌肉萎缩的数据点。然而,通过肢体周径测量所观察到的大腿围度与股四头肌力量之间是否存在有意义的关联,相关研究较少。
回顾性评估大腿围度的左右差异(SSD)和肢体对称指数(LSI)与股四头肌等长肌力测试之间是否存在相关性。
一项回顾性病例对照研究。
67例接受韧带重建手术的患者在术后6个月随访期间(6.47±0.79个月)完成测试。测试包括临床和力量测量。临床测量包括大腿围度的左右差异(SSD),力量测试包括通过等速测力计在膝关节屈曲90度时进行等长测试获得的股四头肌力量肢体对称指数(LSI)。采用Pearson相关系数评估变量之间的关系。
主要发现为测试时大腿围度平均差异为2.53 + 1.54 cm,股四头肌LSI平均为66.88 + 16.93%。大腿围度差异与股四头肌LSI之间存在中度正相关(r = 0.36,r2 = 0.13,p = 0.003)。
大腿围度与等长肌力之间存在中度正相关,这可能有助于临床医生监测左右侧的力量差异。大腿围度仅占影响股四头肌LSI的所有因素的约13%,因此膝关节手术后应采用一系列不同的测试和测量方法来正确评估肌肉力量。
3级证据。