Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5710-5723. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08938-5. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
Despite advances in surgical technique, bile leak remains a common complication following hepatectomy. We sought to identify incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes associated with biliary leak.
This is an ACS-NSQIP study. Distribution of bile leak stratified by surgical approach and hepatectomy type were identified. Univariate and multivariate factors associated with bile leak and outcomes were evaluated.
Robotic hepatectomy was associated with less bile leak (5.4% vs. 11.4%; p < 0.001) compared to open. There were no significant differences in bile leak between robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomy (5.4% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.905, respectively). Operative factors risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing robotic hepatectomy included right hepatectomy [OR 4.42 (95% CI 1.74-11.20); p = 0.002], conversion [OR 4.40 (95% CI 1.39-11.72); p = 0.010], pringle maneuver [OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.03-9.88); p = 0.044], and drain placement [OR 28.25 (95% CI 8.34-95.72); p < 0.001]. Bile leak was associated with increased reoperation (8.7% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (26.6% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (2% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), and complications (67.2% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001) for patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy.
While MIS confers less risk for bile leak than open hepatectomy, risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy were identified. Bile leaks were associated with multiple additional complications, and the robotic approach had an equal risk for bile leak than laparoscopic in this time period.
尽管手术技术取得了进步,但胆漏仍然是肝切除术后的常见并发症。我们试图确定胆漏的发生率、危险因素和相关结果。
这是一项 ACS-NSQIP 研究。确定了按手术入路和肝切除术类型分层的胆漏分布。评估了与胆漏和结果相关的单因素和多因素。
与开腹相比,机器人肝切除术胆漏发生率较低(5.4%比 11.4%;p<0.001)。机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术之间的胆漏发生率无显著差异(5.4%比 5.3%;p=0.905)。在接受机器人肝切除术的患者中,手术因素中胆漏的危险因素包括右肝切除术[比值比(OR)4.42(95%置信区间 1.74-11.20);p=0.002]、中转开腹[OR 4.40(95%置信区间 1.39-11.72);p=0.010]、阻断血流[OR 3.19(95%置信区间 1.03-9.88);p=0.044]和引流管放置[OR 28.25(95%置信区间 8.34-95.72);p<0.001]。胆漏与再次手术(8.7%比 1.7%,p<0.001)、30 天再入院(26.6%比 6.8%,p<0.001)、30 天死亡率(2%比 0.9%,p<0.001)和并发症(67.2%比 23.4%,p<0.001)相关。
尽管微创与开腹相比,胆漏的风险较低,但微创肝切除术后胆漏的危险因素已被确定。胆漏与多种其他并发症相关,在这段时间内,机器人方法与腹腔镜方法相比,胆漏的风险相等。