• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期移植物功能障碍成分在确定 90 天肝移植物存活率中的作用。

The Utility of Early Allograft Dysfunction Components in Determining 90-Day Liver Graft Survival.

机构信息

Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2022 May;54(4):1017-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.019
PMID:35469656
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) had been established as a useful tool to asses graft and patient survival after liver transplant. We wanted to evaluate effect of EAD components on early graft survival.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 264 patients with EAD after liver transplant in the period between 2015 and 2019. The patients with retransplants were excluded from analyses. The EAD was determined with Olthoff criteria. The logistic regression model was used for analyses. The 90-day graft survival was set as a primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

The main indications for transplant in the analyzed group were hepatitis C virus infection (53 patients, 20.1%), hepatitis B infection (22, 8.3%), primary sclerosing cholangitis (28, 10.1%), and alcoholic liver disease (62, 23.5%), with a median model for end-stage liver disease score of 13.5 points. The 90-day graft loss occurred in 51 patients (19.3%). Each of the components used in EAD diagnosis was found to be correlated with 90-day graft loss. The bilirubin concentration on day 7 (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-6.7; P < .001), international normalized ratio on day 7 (OR, 179; 95% CI, 39-815; P < .001), and the natural logarithm of alanine aminotransferase (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6-6.4) and aspartate aminotransferase (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.4-4.9) predicted 90-day graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EAD, international normalized ratio ≥ 1.6 on day 7 was the strongest predictor of early graft-loss among all EAD components.

摘要

背景

早期移植物功能障碍(EAD)已被确立为评估肝移植后移植物和患者存活率的有用工具。我们想要评估 EAD 成分对早期移植物存活率的影响。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年至 2019 年间 264 例肝移植后发生 EAD 的患者。排除再次移植的患者。EAD 采用 Olthoff 标准确定。采用逻辑回归模型进行分析。90 天移植物存活率设为主要观察终点。

结果

分析组的主要移植适应证为丙型肝炎病毒感染(53 例,20.1%)、乙型肝炎感染(22 例,8.3%)、原发性硬化性胆管炎(28 例,10.1%)和酒精性肝病(62 例,23.5%),中位终末期肝病模型评分为 13.5 分。51 例患者(19.3%)发生 90 天移植物丢失。EAD 诊断中使用的每个成分均与 90 天移植物丢失相关。第 7 天胆红素浓度(比值比 [OR],3.1;95%置信区间 [CI],1.4-6.7;P<0.001)、第 7 天国际标准化比值(OR,179;95%CI,39-815;P<0.001)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(OR,3.1;95%CI,1.6-6.4)和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(OR,1.4;95%CI,0.4-4.9)的自然对数值均预测 90 天移植物丢失。

结论

在 EAD 患者中,第 7 天国际标准化比值≥1.6 是所有 EAD 成分中早期移植物丢失的最强预测因素。

相似文献

1
The Utility of Early Allograft Dysfunction Components in Determining 90-Day Liver Graft Survival.早期移植物功能障碍成分在确定 90 天肝移植物存活率中的作用。
Transplant Proc. 2022 May;54(4):1017-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Evaluation of Early Allograft Function Using the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation Risk Score Model.利用移植后风险评分模型评估肝移植物早期功能。
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):436-444. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5040.
3
Evaluation of the updated definition of early allograft dysfunction in donation after brain death and donation after cardiac death liver allografts.评估脑死亡后供体和心脏死亡后供体肝移植中更新的早期移植物功能障碍定义。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2012 Aug 15;11(4):372-6. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(12)60194-5.
4
Early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation: an intermediate outcome measure for targeted improvements.肝移植术后早期移植物功能障碍:用于针对性改善的中间结局指标
Ann Hepatol. 2016 Jan-Feb;15(1):53-60. doi: 10.5604/16652681.1184212.
5
A score model for the continuous grading of early allograft dysfunction severity.一种用于早期移植器官功能障碍严重程度连续分级的评分模型。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Jan;21(1):38-46. doi: 10.1002/lt.23990. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
6
"Model for Early Allograft Function" Outperforms "Early Allograft Dysfunction" as a Predictor of Transplant Survival.“早期移植肾功能模型”作为移植存活的预测指标优于“早期移植肾功能障碍”。
Transplantation. 2017 Aug;101(8):e258-e264. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001833.
7
Analysis of the Predictive Ability for Graft Loss and Mortality of Two Criteria for Early Allograft Dysfunction After Liver Transplantation.肝移植后早期移植物功能障碍两种标准对移植物丢失和死亡率的预测能力分析。
Transplant Proc. 2018 Mar;50(2):605-609. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.057.
8
Patterns of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: The A2ALL Experience.成人活体供肝移植早期移植肝功能障碍模式:A2ALL研究经验
Transplantation. 2016 Jul;100(7):1490-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001240.
9
Early allograft dysfunction and liver transplant outcomes: a single center retrospective study.早期移植肝功能障碍与肝移植结局:一项单中心回顾性研究
Transplant Proc. 2012 Oct;44(8):2449-51. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.08.002.
10
Negativization of viremia prior to liver transplant reduces early allograft dysfunction in hepatitis C-positive recipients.肝移植前病毒血症转阴可降低丙型肝炎阳性受者的早期移植物功能障碍。
Liver Transpl. 2017 Jul;23(7):915-924. doi: 10.1002/lt.24772.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Allograft Dysfunction after liver transplantation- definition, incidence and relevance in a single-centre analysis.肝移植术后早期移植物功能障碍——单中心分析中的定义、发病率及相关性
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 19;410(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8.