• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别和手术切口对单纯二尖瓣手术患者术后生存的影响。

Effect of sex and surgical incision on survival after isolated primary mitral valve operations.

机构信息

Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK.

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Oct 4;62(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac273.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezac273
PMID:35471499
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Multiple studies have suggested that women have worse outcomes than men following mitral valve (MV) surgery-most of those studies reported on conventional sternotomy (CS) MV surgery. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether or not the minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) approach might mitigate a worse survival in women following MV surgery.

METHODS

We identified patients with isolated primary MV operations with or without tricuspid valve repair performed between 2007 and 2019. Patients were propensity score-matched across the MIMVS and CS surgical approaches. Sex was excluded from the matching process to discern whether female patients had a different likelihood of receiving minimally invasive surgery than males. A Cox proportional hazards model was fitted in the matched cohort and adjusted for the imbalance in baseline characteristics using the propensity score.

RESULTS

Of 956 patients (417 MIMVS, 539 CS; 424 females), the matched set comprised 342 pairs (684 patients; 296 females) of patients who were well balanced across MIMVS and CS groups with regard to preoperative clinical characteristics. We observed a 47/53% female/male ratio in the CS group and a 39/61% in the MIMVS group, P = 0.054. In both matched groups, women were older than males. A Cox model adjusted for propensity scores showed no survival difference with sex, surgical type or interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Women present to the surgical team at an older age. They appear less likely to be considered for a MIMVS approach than men. Neither sex nor surgical approach was associated with worse survival in a matched sample.

摘要

目的

多项研究表明,女性在接受二尖瓣(MV)手术后的预后比男性差-这些研究中的大多数报告了传统胸骨切开术(CS)MV 手术。因此,我们旨在探讨微创二尖瓣手术(MIMVS)是否可能减轻女性 MV 手术后的生存状况恶化。

方法

我们确定了 2007 年至 2019 年间接受单纯 MV 手术(伴或不伴三尖瓣修复术)的患者。患者按照 MIMVS 和 CS 手术方法进行倾向评分匹配。性别排除在匹配过程之外,以辨别女性患者接受微创手术的可能性是否与男性不同。在匹配队列中拟合 Cox 比例风险模型,并使用倾向评分调整基线特征的不平衡。

结果

在 956 例患者(MIMVS 417 例,CS 539 例;女性 424 例)中,共有 342 对(684 例;女性 296 例)患者在 MIMVS 和 CS 组之间具有良好的术前临床特征平衡。CS 组女性/男性比例为 47/53%,MIMVS 组为 39/61%,P=0.054。在两个匹配组中,女性都比男性年长。调整倾向评分的 Cox 模型显示,性别、手术类型或两者之间均无生存差异。

结论

女性就诊时年龄较大。与男性相比,她们似乎不太可能被考虑采用 MIMVS 方法。在匹配样本中,性别和手术方式均与较差的生存率无关。

相似文献

1
Effect of sex and surgical incision on survival after isolated primary mitral valve operations.性别和手术切口对单纯二尖瓣手术患者术后生存的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Oct 4;62(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac273.
2
Minimally invasive approach compared to resternotomy for mitral valve surgery in patients with prior cardiac surgery: retrospective multicentre study based on the Netherlands Heart Registration.既往心脏手术后二尖瓣手术中微创入路与胸骨切开术的比较:基于荷兰心脏登记的回顾性多中心研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Oct 4;62(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac420.
3
Does full sternotomy have more significant impact than the cardiopulmonary bypass time in patients of mitral valve surgery?在二尖瓣手术患者中,全胸骨切开术比体外循环时间的影响更显著吗?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Apr 14;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0719-4.
4
Effect of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery compared to sternotomy on short- and long-term outcomes: a retrospective multicentre interventional cohort study based on Netherlands Heart Registration.微创二尖瓣手术与胸骨切开术对短期和长期结果的影响:基于荷兰心脏注册的回顾性多中心干预队列研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 2;61(5):1099-1106. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab507.
5
Operative Outcomes of Concomitant Minimally Invasive Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.同期微创二尖瓣和三尖瓣手术的手术结果
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Oct;14(5):412-418. doi: 10.1177/1556984519864939. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Can we use minimally invasive mitral valve surgery as a safe alternative to sternotomy in high-risk patients?对于高危患者,我们能否将微创二尖瓣手术作为胸骨切开术的一种安全替代方案?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;22(1):92-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv275. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
7
Tricuspid intervention for less-than-severe regurgitation simultaneously with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation.三尖瓣介入治疗伴或不伴房颤的微创二尖瓣手术治疗中-重度反流。
Kardiol Pol. 2023;81(10):990-997. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0137. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
8
Does concomitant tricuspid valve surgery increase the risks of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery? A multicentre comparison based on data from The Netherlands Heart Registration.同期三尖瓣手术是否会增加微创二尖瓣手术的风险?基于荷兰心脏登记处数据的多中心比较。
J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):4362-4370. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17004. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
A review and meta-analysis of conventional sternotomy versus minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for degenerative mitral valve disease focused on the last decade of evidence.一项关于传统胸骨切开术与微创二尖瓣手术治疗退行性二尖瓣疾病的回顾性分析和荟萃分析,重点关注过去十年的证据。
Perfusion. 2024 Jul;39(5):988-997. doi: 10.1177/02676591231174579. Epub 2023 May 5.
10
Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery.微创入路与胸骨切开术治疗二尖瓣手术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Heart. 2019 May;105(10):783-789. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314049. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of mitral valve repair vs. replacement for mitral valve regurgitation.二尖瓣反流的二尖瓣修复术与置换术的比较。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Aug 11;11(5):587-603. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae108.
2
Propensity Matched Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Mitral Surgery: Does a Heart-Team Approach Eliminate Female Gender as an Independent Risk Factor?微创二尖瓣手术的倾向匹配结果:心脏团队方法能否消除女性作为独立危险因素的影响?
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 3;13(6):949. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060949.