Suppr超能文献

不同基台高度的氧化锆全瓷冠与钛基台之间四种不同种植体粘接剂的脱位力。

Pull-off Force of Four Different Implant Cements Between Zirconia Crowns and Titanium Implant Abutments in Two Different Abutment Heights.

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 May-Jun;42(3):e67-e74. doi: 10.11607/prd.4926.

Abstract

This study evaluated the pull-off force between titanium abutments and zirconia crowns that were bonded using four different cements and two abutment heights (AHs). In total, 24 titanium abutments (3-mm AH: n = 12; 5-mm AH: n = 12; taper: 7.5 degrees) and 24 zirconia crowns were designed, manufactured, cemented with one of four dental cements (one temporary, two semi-permanent, one permanent), stored in water for 24 hours, and thermocycled (37,500 cycles, equal to ~4 years in vivo). The pull-off force needed to separate the abutment and crown in each combination was determined eight times per combination of cement type and abutment height. Statistical analysis was conducted at a significance level of P < .05. The permanent self-adhesive composite cement showed a high pull-off force with a risk for crown fracture (mean: 381 N for 3-mm AH; 617 N for 5-mm AH). In contrast, the temporary zinc-oxide cement showed frequent premature decementation after thermocycling (mean: 14 N with 3-mm AH; 28 N with 5-mm AH). Both semi-permanent methacrylate-based cements ranked between the other cements (mean: 31 N/37 N for 3-mm AH; 120 N/72 N for 5-mm AH). Statistically significant differences were found between all cements (ANOVA P < .001). The abutment heights differed significantly for all cements (P < .005) except for the temporary zinc-oxide cement. Methacrylate-based cements were the most reliable cements for semi-permanent mounting of zirconia crowns on titanium abutments. They provide sufficient retention to avoid unintended loosening and are weak enough to remove the crown without causing damage.

摘要

本研究评估了使用四种不同的黏固剂和两种基台高度(AH)将钛基台和氧化锆冠黏合在一起的拉脱力。总共设计、制作了 24 个钛基台(3mmAH:n=12;5mmAH:n=12;锥度:7.5 度)和 24 个氧化锆冠,用四种牙科黏固剂中的一种(一种临时黏固剂、两种半永久黏固剂、一种永久黏固剂)黏固,在水中储存 24 小时,热循环(37500 次循环,相当于体内约 4 年)。每种黏固剂类型和基台高度组合的分离基台和冠所需的拉脱力在每种组合的 8 次测量中确定。统计分析在 P <.05 的显著水平下进行。永久自黏结复合黏固剂表现出高的拉脱力,存在冠折风险(3mmAH 时平均为 381N;5mmAH 时平均为 617N)。相比之下,临时氧化锌黏固剂在热循环后经常过早离解(3mmAH 时平均为 14N;5mmAH 时平均为 28N)。两种半永久甲基丙烯酸基黏固剂在其他黏固剂之间排名(3mmAH 时平均为 31N/37N;5mmAH 时平均为 120N/72N)。所有黏固剂之间的差异均具有统计学意义(ANOVA P <.001)。除了临时氧化锌黏固剂外,所有黏固剂的基台高度均有显著差异(P <.005)。甲基丙烯酸基黏固剂是氧化锆冠在钛基台上半永久黏固的最可靠黏固剂。它们提供足够的固位力以避免非意愿松动,且强度足以在不造成损伤的情况下取下冠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验