Suppr超能文献

无体细胞突变的非功能性颈动脉体肿瘤患者可考虑非手术治疗。

Non-Functional Carotid Body Tumors in Patients Without Somatic Mutations May Be Considered for Non-Operative Management.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;85:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.021. Epub 2022 Apr 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid Body Tumors (CBT) are rare neuroendocrine paragangliomas which are typically asymptomatic and benign, with a low rate of biochemical functionality. Historically, early surgical excision was recommended to prevent development of CBT-related complications. Yet, CBT resection can result in significant cranial nerve and vascular injuries. Recent work has shown successful primary observation without resection of non-carotid body, cranial paragangliomas with slow growth and low rate of neuropathies. We hypothesize that primary observation of CBT is safe and may be considered for majority of CBT.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients at a multi-hospital healthcare system with radiologic identification and/or diagnostic or procedural billing codes for CBT (2000-2019). Tumor size (greatest diameter), associated symptoms, and interventions were recorded at the initial evaluation and throughout follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression investigated the risk of initial surgical resection.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients (mean age, 59 ± 19 years; 67% female), with 123 CBT (mean diameter 23 ± 12 mm; 52% right) were initially evaluated by otolaryngologists (51%), vascular surgeons (25%), neurosurgeons (8%), or other (16%) medical providers. Fity-five CBT were initially resected, 63 observed, and 5 irradiated. Initial resection was associated with younger age (adjusted odd ratios aOR, 0.95 [95% confidence intervals CI, 0.92-0.97]), male sex (aOR, 4.82 [95% CI, 1.47-15.75]), and evaluation by a vascular surgeon (aOR, 6.17 [95% CI, 2.04-18.63]). Overall median follow-up was 4.7 (IQR, 2.6-9.1) years. Initially observed CBT were on an average stable in size (mean 1 ± 5 mm/year), none became biochemically active, and 2 patients became symptomatic. At the final follow-up, 63 (51%) underwent surgical resection, 54 (44%) observation, and 6 (5%) radiation therapy. Of the 63 surgically resected CBT, 5 (8%) patients had malignant CBT of which 3 (60%) had known somatic mutations (polymerase epsilon [n = 1], succinate dehydrogenase-D gene [n = 2]). Thirty percent of CBT resections had in-hospital postoperative complications, notably including 1 stroke which occurred in an initially observed patient and 16 cranial nerve complications which all occurred in immediately resected patients. Three resected CBT locally recurred, only 1 of which had malignant pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with newly diagnosed CBT require biochemical functionality and somatic mutation testing. In the absence of these findings, initial observation of CBTs with annual imaging and symptom monitoring may be considered an alternative to immediate resection which demonstrates a high risk of clinically meaningful postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

颈动脉体肿瘤(CBT)是罕见的神经内分泌副神经节瘤,通常无症状且为良性,生化功能活性较低。历史上,建议早期手术切除以预防 CBT 相关并发症的发生。然而,CBT 切除可能导致颅神经和血管严重损伤。最近的研究表明,对于生长缓慢且神经病变发生率低的非颈动脉体、颅神经副神经节瘤,可成功地进行初次观察而不进行切除。我们假设 CBT 的初次观察是安全的,对于大多数 CBT 可以考虑采用这种方法。

方法

对多医院医疗系统中放射学识别和/或诊断或程序计费代码为 CBT(2000-2019 年)的患者进行回顾性队列研究。在初次评估和随访过程中记录肿瘤大小(最大直径)、相关症状和干预措施。多变量逻辑回归分析了初次手术切除的风险。

结果

共有 108 名患者(平均年龄 59±19 岁;67%为女性),123 个 CBT(平均直径 23±12mm;52%为右侧)最初由耳鼻喉科医生(51%)、血管外科医生(25%)、神经外科医生(8%)或其他(16%)医疗提供者进行评估。55 个 CBT 最初被切除,63 个被观察,5 个被放疗。初次切除与年龄较小(校正后的优势比 aOR,0.95 [95%置信区间 CI,0.92-0.97])、男性(aOR,4.82 [95% CI,1.47-15.75])和由血管外科医生评估(aOR,6.17 [95% CI,2.04-18.63])有关。总体中位随访时间为 4.7(IQR,2.6-9.1)年。最初观察到的 CBT 平均大小稳定(平均每年 1±5mm),无生化活性,2 例患者出现症状。在最后一次随访时,63 例(51%)接受了手术切除,54 例(44%)进行了观察,6 例(5%)接受了放疗。在 63 例接受手术切除的 CBT 中,5 例(8%)为恶性 CBT,其中 3 例(60%)有已知的体细胞突变(聚合酶 epsilon[n=1],琥珀酸脱氢酶-D 基因[n=2])。30%的 CBT 切除术有住院术后并发症,特别是包括 1 例发生在初次观察患者中的中风和 16 例颅神经并发症,这些并发症均发生在立即切除患者中。3 例 CBT 局部复发,只有 1 例为恶性病理。

结论

新诊断的 CBT 患者需要进行生化功能和体细胞突变检测。在没有这些发现的情况下,对每年进行影像学检查和症状监测的 CBT 进行初次观察,可能是一种替代立即切除的方法,因为立即切除的术后并发症发生率较高。

相似文献

2
Current surgical management of carotid body tumors.颈动脉体瘤的当前外科治疗方法
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(6):1703-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.076.
3
8
Management of Carotid Bifurcation Tumors: 30-Year Experience.颈动脉分叉部肿瘤的管理:30年经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;34:200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
8
Carotid body tumor: a case report and literature review.颈动脉体瘤:一例病例报告及文献综述
J Radiol Case Rep. 2019 Aug 31;13(8):19-30. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v13i8.3681. eCollection 2019 Aug.
10
Surgical Management of Bilateral Carotid Body Tumors.双侧颈动脉体瘤的手术治疗
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 May;57:187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.019. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验