• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Non-Functional Carotid Body Tumors in Patients Without Somatic Mutations May Be Considered for Non-Operative Management.无体细胞突变的非功能性颈动脉体肿瘤患者可考虑非手术治疗。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;85:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.021. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
2
Current surgical management of carotid body tumors.颈动脉体瘤的当前外科治疗方法
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(6):1703-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.076.
3
Multispecialty surgical management of carotid body tumors in the modern era.现代时代颈动脉体肿瘤的多学科外科治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2036-2040. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.072. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Prevalence, characteristics, evaluation, and management of carotid body tumors: Systematic analysis based on available evidence.颈动脉体瘤的患病率、特征、评估和管理:基于现有证据的系统分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):574-585.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.443. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Improving Outcomes in Carotid Body Tumors Treatment: The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach.改善颈动脉体瘤治疗效果:多学科团队方法的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;75:315-323. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.074. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Surgical outcomes and factors associated with malignancy in carotid body tumors.颈动脉体瘤的手术结果和与恶性肿瘤相关的因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;74(2):586-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.097. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Predictors for postoperative cranial nerve complications in carotid body tumor resection: a retrospective cohort study.颈动脉体瘤切除术术后颅神经并发症的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):4057-4061. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000689.
8
Management of Carotid Bifurcation Tumors: 30-Year Experience.颈动脉分叉部肿瘤的管理:30年经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;34:200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Preoperative Imaging Features are Associated with Surgical Complications Following Carotid Body Tumor Resection.术前影像学特征与颈动脉体瘤切除术后手术并发症相关。
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2084-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3058-9.
10
Multidisciplinary management of carotid body tumors: a single-institution case series of 22 patients.颈动脉体瘤的多学科管理:22例患者的单机构病例系列
J Neurosurg. 2022 May 6;138(1):95-103. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.JNS22136. Print 2023 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Surgical Management of a Coincidence of Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease, Severe Carotid Atherosclerosis, and Carotid Paraganglioma: A Case Report and Literature Review.三血管冠状动脉疾病、严重颈动脉粥样硬化和颈动脉副神经节瘤并存的成功外科治疗:病例报告及文献综述
Clin Case Rep. 2025 Jun 26;13(7):e70586. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70586. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Case report: Cardiac arrest during carotid body tumor resection indicating carotid sinus hypersensitivity.病例报告:颈动脉体瘤切除术中发生心脏骤停,提示颈动脉窦过敏。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 16;9:996644. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.996644. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Multispecialty surgical management of carotid body tumors in the modern era.现代时代颈动脉体肿瘤的多学科外科治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2036-2040. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.072. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
2
Contemporary management of carotid body tumors in a Midwestern academic center.中西部学术中心颈动脉体瘤的当代治疗方法。
Surgery. 2021 Mar;169(3):700-704. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Surgical Management of Carotid Body Tumor and Risk Factors of Postoperative Cranial Nerve Injury.颈动脉体瘤的外科治疗及术后颅神经损伤的危险因素。
World J Surg. 2020 Dec;44(12):4254-4260. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05723-8. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
4
Clinical Outcome of Carotid Body Paraganglioma Management: A Review of 10-Year Experience.颈动脉体副神经节瘤治疗的临床结果:10年经验回顾
J Oncol. 2020 Jul 20;2020:6081273. doi: 10.1155/2020/6081273. eCollection 2020.
5
Variations in Surgical Outcomes of Carotid Body Tumors by Surgical Specialty.不同外科专业手术治疗颈动脉体瘤的效果差异。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):E190-E195. doi: 10.1002/lary.28688. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
6
Carotid Body Tumor Resection: Long-Term Outcome of 67 Cases without Preoperative Embolization.颈动脉体瘤切除术:67例未行术前栓塞治疗患者的长期预后
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.030. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
7
Carotid Body Tumor Resection: Just as Safe without Preoperative Embolization.颈动脉体瘤切除术:无需术前栓塞同样安全。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;64:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.09.025. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
8
Carotid body tumor: a case report and literature review.颈动脉体瘤:一例病例报告及文献综述
J Radiol Case Rep. 2019 Aug 31;13(8):19-30. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v13i8.3681. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Presentation and Surgical Management of Patients With Carotid Body Tumours.颈动脉体瘤患者的临床表现和手术治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;57(4):477-486. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.038. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
10
Surgical Management of Bilateral Carotid Body Tumors.双侧颈动脉体瘤的手术治疗
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 May;57:187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.019. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

无体细胞突变的非功能性颈动脉体肿瘤患者可考虑非手术治疗。

Non-Functional Carotid Body Tumors in Patients Without Somatic Mutations May Be Considered for Non-Operative Management.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;85:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.021. Epub 2022 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.021
PMID:35472500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9627968/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid Body Tumors (CBT) are rare neuroendocrine paragangliomas which are typically asymptomatic and benign, with a low rate of biochemical functionality. Historically, early surgical excision was recommended to prevent development of CBT-related complications. Yet, CBT resection can result in significant cranial nerve and vascular injuries. Recent work has shown successful primary observation without resection of non-carotid body, cranial paragangliomas with slow growth and low rate of neuropathies. We hypothesize that primary observation of CBT is safe and may be considered for majority of CBT.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients at a multi-hospital healthcare system with radiologic identification and/or diagnostic or procedural billing codes for CBT (2000-2019). Tumor size (greatest diameter), associated symptoms, and interventions were recorded at the initial evaluation and throughout follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression investigated the risk of initial surgical resection.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients (mean age, 59 ± 19 years; 67% female), with 123 CBT (mean diameter 23 ± 12 mm; 52% right) were initially evaluated by otolaryngologists (51%), vascular surgeons (25%), neurosurgeons (8%), or other (16%) medical providers. Fity-five CBT were initially resected, 63 observed, and 5 irradiated. Initial resection was associated with younger age (adjusted odd ratios aOR, 0.95 [95% confidence intervals CI, 0.92-0.97]), male sex (aOR, 4.82 [95% CI, 1.47-15.75]), and evaluation by a vascular surgeon (aOR, 6.17 [95% CI, 2.04-18.63]). Overall median follow-up was 4.7 (IQR, 2.6-9.1) years. Initially observed CBT were on an average stable in size (mean 1 ± 5 mm/year), none became biochemically active, and 2 patients became symptomatic. At the final follow-up, 63 (51%) underwent surgical resection, 54 (44%) observation, and 6 (5%) radiation therapy. Of the 63 surgically resected CBT, 5 (8%) patients had malignant CBT of which 3 (60%) had known somatic mutations (polymerase epsilon [n = 1], succinate dehydrogenase-D gene [n = 2]). Thirty percent of CBT resections had in-hospital postoperative complications, notably including 1 stroke which occurred in an initially observed patient and 16 cranial nerve complications which all occurred in immediately resected patients. Three resected CBT locally recurred, only 1 of which had malignant pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with newly diagnosed CBT require biochemical functionality and somatic mutation testing. In the absence of these findings, initial observation of CBTs with annual imaging and symptom monitoring may be considered an alternative to immediate resection which demonstrates a high risk of clinically meaningful postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

颈动脉体肿瘤(CBT)是罕见的神经内分泌副神经节瘤,通常无症状且为良性,生化功能活性较低。历史上,建议早期手术切除以预防 CBT 相关并发症的发生。然而,CBT 切除可能导致颅神经和血管严重损伤。最近的研究表明,对于生长缓慢且神经病变发生率低的非颈动脉体、颅神经副神经节瘤,可成功地进行初次观察而不进行切除。我们假设 CBT 的初次观察是安全的,对于大多数 CBT 可以考虑采用这种方法。

方法

对多医院医疗系统中放射学识别和/或诊断或程序计费代码为 CBT(2000-2019 年)的患者进行回顾性队列研究。在初次评估和随访过程中记录肿瘤大小(最大直径)、相关症状和干预措施。多变量逻辑回归分析了初次手术切除的风险。

结果

共有 108 名患者(平均年龄 59±19 岁;67%为女性),123 个 CBT(平均直径 23±12mm;52%为右侧)最初由耳鼻喉科医生(51%)、血管外科医生(25%)、神经外科医生(8%)或其他(16%)医疗提供者进行评估。55 个 CBT 最初被切除,63 个被观察,5 个被放疗。初次切除与年龄较小(校正后的优势比 aOR,0.95 [95%置信区间 CI,0.92-0.97])、男性(aOR,4.82 [95% CI,1.47-15.75])和由血管外科医生评估(aOR,6.17 [95% CI,2.04-18.63])有关。总体中位随访时间为 4.7(IQR,2.6-9.1)年。最初观察到的 CBT 平均大小稳定(平均每年 1±5mm),无生化活性,2 例患者出现症状。在最后一次随访时,63 例(51%)接受了手术切除,54 例(44%)进行了观察,6 例(5%)接受了放疗。在 63 例接受手术切除的 CBT 中,5 例(8%)为恶性 CBT,其中 3 例(60%)有已知的体细胞突变(聚合酶 epsilon[n=1],琥珀酸脱氢酶-D 基因[n=2])。30%的 CBT 切除术有住院术后并发症,特别是包括 1 例发生在初次观察患者中的中风和 16 例颅神经并发症,这些并发症均发生在立即切除患者中。3 例 CBT 局部复发,只有 1 例为恶性病理。

结论

新诊断的 CBT 患者需要进行生化功能和体细胞突变检测。在没有这些发现的情况下,对每年进行影像学检查和症状监测的 CBT 进行初次观察,可能是一种替代立即切除的方法,因为立即切除的术后并发症发生率较高。