• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三维计算机断层扫描(3D-CT)比较前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中股骨隧道制备的由内向外法和由外向内法

Comparison of Inside-Out and Outside-In Methods of Femoral Tunnel Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using 3D-CT.

作者信息

Vadlamudi Abhinay, Kale Amit, Sharma Jaiman, Patil Vishal, Pai Mukund

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical college, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Mar 21;14(3):e23367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23367. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.23367
PMID:35475087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9020750/
Abstract

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques continue to evolve and the need to address the more anatomical femoral tunnel placement of the graft is critical, and in our study, we assessed the placement of femoral tunnel via transportal and retrograde drilling techniques. Material and methods Sixty patients where n=31 for retrograde, n=29 for transportal were assessed via CT knee for the femoral tunnel aperture on the intercondylar ridge via high low and deep shallow direction ratio and interpreted accordingly. Results In our study, the femoral tunnel done via transportal method (n=29) has a deep shallow ratio range of 22%-47% and mean of 31.9±6.5, and graft is anatomical in 79%. The femoral tunnel done via the retrograde method (n=31) has a deep shallow depth ratio range of 11%-41% with a mean of 27.5±6.5 and graft is anatomical in 77% of the study group and the p-value means the ratio is 0.01 (significant). The femoral tunnel done via transportal method (n=29) has a high low ratio range of 19%-45% and mean of 32.9±6.3 and graft is anatomical in 72%. The femoral tunnel done via the retrograde method (n=31) has a deep shallow depth ratio range of 20%-38% with a mean of 33.9±4.1 and graft is anatomical in 94% of the study group with a p-value mean ratio being 0.51 (insignificant). Conclusion Watch out for the femoral tunnel placement in a deep shallow direction while going for standard transportal technique and high low direction while performing retrograde technique.

摘要

引言 前交叉韧带(ACL)重建技术不断发展,解决移植物更符合解剖结构的股骨隧道放置问题至关重要。在我们的研究中,我们通过经胫骨隧道和逆行钻孔技术评估了股骨隧道的放置情况。

材料与方法 60例患者,其中逆行钻孔组n = 31例,经胫骨隧道组n = 29例,通过膝关节CT评估髁间嵴上股骨隧道开口的高低和深浅方向比例,并据此进行解读。

结果 在我们的研究中,经胫骨隧道法(n = 29)制作的股骨隧道深浅比例范围为22% - 47%,平均为31.9±6.5,79%的移植物符合解剖结构。逆行法(n = 31)制作的股骨隧道深浅比例范围为11% - 41%,平均为27.5±6.5,77%的研究组移植物符合解剖结构,p值表明该比例为0.01(具有显著性)。经胫骨隧道法(n = 29)制作的股骨隧道高低比例范围为19% - 45%,平均为32.9±6.3,72%的移植物符合解剖结构。逆行法(n = 31)制作的股骨隧道深浅比例范围为20% - 38%,平均为33.9±4.1,94%的研究组移植物符合解剖结构,p值平均比例为0.51(无显著性)。

结论 在采用标准经胫骨隧道技术时,要注意股骨隧道在深浅方向的放置;在进行逆行技术时,要注意高低方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/7d4f47eaa6ea/cureus-0014-00000023367-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/b7210887864d/cureus-0014-00000023367-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/5a335338344a/cureus-0014-00000023367-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/541dbbf35e45/cureus-0014-00000023367-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/7d4f47eaa6ea/cureus-0014-00000023367-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/b7210887864d/cureus-0014-00000023367-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/5a335338344a/cureus-0014-00000023367-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/541dbbf35e45/cureus-0014-00000023367-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8693/9020750/7d4f47eaa6ea/cureus-0014-00000023367-i04.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Inside-Out and Outside-In Methods of Femoral Tunnel Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using 3D-CT.使用三维计算机断层扫描(3D-CT)比较前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中股骨隧道制备的由内向外法和由外向内法
Cureus. 2022 Mar 21;14(3):e23367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23367. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Relationship between femoral tunnel location and graft bending angle in outside-in and transportal technique for ACL double bundle reconstruction in 3D-CT study.3D-CT研究中前交叉韧带双束重建的由外向内技术和经胫骨技术中股骨隧道位置与移植物弯曲角度的关系
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):839-46. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2226-6. Epub 2015 May 5.
3
Comparison of femur tunnel aperture location in patients undergoing transtibial and anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.经胫骨和解剖单束前交叉韧带重建患者股骨隧道开口位置的比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3713-3721. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3657-x. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
4
Transportal femoral drilling creates more horizontal ACL graft orientation compared to transtibial drilling: A 3D CT imaging study.与经胫骨钻孔相比,经股骨钻孔可使前交叉韧带移植物的方向更水平:一项三维CT成像研究。
Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
5
Femoral and tibial graft tunnel parameters after transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.经胫骨、前内侧入路和由外向内单束前交叉韧带重建术后的股骨和胫骨移植隧道参数。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2250-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515590221. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Superior graft maturation after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transtibial drilling technique compared to the transportal technique.与经皮隧道技术相比,胫骨隧道技术行解剖双束前交叉韧带重建术后移植物成熟更好。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2468-2477. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5240-8. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Eccentric graft positioning within the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal and outside-in techniques.在采用经胫骨隧道和由外向内技术的解剖双束前交叉韧带重建术中,移植物在股骨隧道开口内的偏心定位。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1180-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546514568278. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
8
Location of the femoral tunnel aperture in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques.单束前交叉韧带重建中股骨隧道开口的位置:经胫骨、前内侧入路和由外向内技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2533-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513500764. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
9
Comparison of transportal and outside-in techniques for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in double-bundle ACL reconstruction -three-dimensional CT analysis of bone tunnel geometry.双束前交叉韧带重建中后外侧股骨隧道钻孔的经胫骨与由外向内技术比较——骨隧道几何形状的三维CT分析
J Orthop Sci. 2017 May;22(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
10
No difference in graft healing or clinical outcome between trans-portal and outside-in techniques after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后,经皮入路与经皮外入路在移植物愈合和临床结果方面无差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2338-2344. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4655-y. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Assessment of Femoral Tunnel after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后股骨隧道的三维 CT 评估的实用性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 26;59(10):1716. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101716.
2
Femoral Tunnel Geometry and Graft Inclination Angles in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Flexible Reamer System.使用柔性扩孔器系统进行前交叉韧带重建时的股骨隧道几何形状和移植物倾斜角度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 26;59(6):1031. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061031.

本文引用的文献

1
Anatomic femoral tunnel placement is difficult by the transtibial technique: comparison of three different femoral tunnel drilling techniques in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.经胫骨技术进行解剖股骨隧道置钉困难:双束前交叉韧带重建中三种不同股骨隧道钻取技术的比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Feb;28(2):584-593. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05740-8. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements.前交叉韧带重建术后解剖学移植物放置的计算机断层扫描评估:网格测量与角度测量的比较研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar 19;7(3):2325967119832594. doi: 10.1177/2325967119832594. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction.初次单束 ACL 重建中部分解剖学隧道位置发生率较高。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):462-467. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4555-1. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
4
Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中隧道位置演变的综述
World J Orthop. 2015 Mar 18;6(2):252-62. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.252.
5
Advantages and Disadvantages of Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.经胫骨、前内侧入路及由外向内股骨隧道钻孔在单束前交叉韧带重建中的优缺点:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
6
How accurate are anatomic landmarks for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An in vivo imaging analysis comparing both anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques.前交叉韧带重建术中股骨隧道定位的解剖标志准确性如何?一项比较前内侧入路和由外向内技术的体内成像分析。
Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):882-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.038. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
7
Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites: comparison of plain radiography and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging to anatomic dissection.前交叉韧带附着点的解剖:X线平片、三维计算机断层扫描成像与解剖标本的比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Aug;23(8):2297-2305. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3041-2. Epub 2014 May 10.
8
The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years.ACL 重建术的五十年演变历程。
Int Orthop. 2013 Feb;37(2):181-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1759-3. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
9
Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.对比经胫骨与前内入路股骨隧道扩髓技术的前交叉韧带隧道位置和移植物倾斜角的高分辨率磁共振成像研究。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Nov;27(11):1511-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Tunnel position and graft orientation in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and imaging analysis.前交叉韧带重建失败中隧道位置和移植物取向:临床与影像学分析。
Int Orthop. 2012 Apr;36(4):845-52. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1333-4. Epub 2011 Aug 9.