Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
J Med Microbiol. 2022 Apr;71(4). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001524.
Fosfomycin has retained activity against many multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negatives, and may be useful against extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales to improve clinical outcomes. There are few data from the UK on the susceptibility of invasive Gram-negative isolates to fosfomycin, especially in the era of increasing use of oral fosfomycin for urinary tract infections (UTIs). We evaluated fosfomycin susceptibility against 100 consecutive Gram-negative bloodstream isolates, both individually, and in combination with other mechanistically similar and differing antibiotics. The aim was to investigate the synergy between antibiotic combinations against several isolates with variable levels of resistance. Disc diffusion and MIC test strip methods applying revised EUCAST guidelines for Fosfomycin were used, followed by the MTS™ 'cross synergy' method for 'resistant' isolates as defined below: (a) Fosfomycin resistant by MIC test strip; (b) MDR isolates defined as being resistant to ≥3 classes of antibiotics (based on routine sensitivity testing; beta lactams were considered as a single class), and/or (c) AMP C or ESBL or carbapenemase producers (or carbapenem resistant). FIC Index (Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index) calculations were used to interpret findings, whereby: FIC = (MICA combination A+B/ MIC agent A) + (MICB combination A+B/ MIC agent B). A result of ≤0.5 was taken to indicate 'synergy', >0.5 and ≤1.0 to indicate 'additive' effect, >1.0 and ≤4.0 to indicate 'indifference', and >4.0 to indicate 'antagonism'. We found that 95/100 isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin by MIC test strip, with 88/100 isolates susceptible to fosfomycin by disc, based on EUCAST guideline breakpoints. A total of 30/100 isolates (the more 'resistant' of the 100) were eligible for synergy testing according to our definitions (see ), with the remaining 70 isolates not tested further. Seventeen out of 30 were MDR, 2/30 were AMP C producers and 9/30 were ESBL producers. Overall, 34/300 (11 %) of all combination tests showed synergy and 161/300 (54 %) were additive. Synergy was most commonly detected between fosfomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics, including piperacillin/tazobactam (10/30; 33 %), ceftazidime/avibactam (10/30; 30 %), and temocillin (8/30; 27 %). An additive effect was most commonly detected with aztreonam (25/30; 83 %) and meropenem (25/30; 83 %), but 100 % indifference was found with tigecycline (30/30). No antagonism was identified with any antibiotic combination. Fosfomycin non-susceptibility by MIC test strip was unusual. Synergy was variable when combining fosfomycin with other antibiotics against the more 'resistant' isolates. Synergistic/additive effects were detected for beta-lactam/fosfomycin combinations in >80 % of all such combinations, suggesting beta-lactams may be the preferred partner for fosfomycin. Agents with a discordant site of action were more likely to result in indifference. Antagonism was not detected.
磷霉素对许多多药耐药(MDR)革兰氏阴性菌仍保持活性,并且可能对产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科细菌有效,以改善临床结果。英国关于侵袭性革兰氏阴性菌分离株对磷霉素敏感性的数据很少,尤其是在口服磷霉素用于尿路感染(UTI)的使用日益增加的时代。我们评估了 100 株连续的革兰氏阴性菌血流感染分离株对磷霉素的敏感性,单独评估,并与其他机制相似和不同的抗生素联合评估。目的是研究几种具有不同耐药水平的分离株的抗生素组合之间的协同作用。应用修订后的 EUCAST 磷霉素指南,采用纸片扩散法和 MIC 测试条方法进行检测,随后对以下定义的“耐药”分离株采用 MTS™“交叉协同”方法进行检测:(a)MIC 测试条法检测为磷霉素耐药;(b)MDR 分离株定义为对≥3 类抗生素耐药(基于常规药敏试验;β内酰胺类抗生素被认为是一类),和/或(c)AMP C 或 ESBL 或碳青霉烯酶产生菌(或碳青霉烯耐药)。采用 FIC 指数(Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index)计算来解释检测结果,其中:FIC =(组合 A+B 的 MICA/MICA 药物 A)+(组合 A+B 的 MICB/MICA 药物 B)。结果≤0.5 表明“协同”,>0.5 和≤1.0 表明“相加”效应,>1.0 和≤4.0 表明“无关”,>4.0 表明“拮抗”。我们发现,根据 MIC 测试条的 EUCAST 指南折点,95/100 株分离株对磷霉素敏感,88/100 株分离株对磷霉素纸片法敏感。根据我们的定义(见),共有 30/100 株分离株(100 株中更“耐药”的分离株)符合协同检测标准,其余 70 株分离株未进一步检测。17/30 株为 MDR,2/30 株为 AMP C 产生菌,9/30 株为 ESBL 产生菌。总的来说,300 株组合检测中 34/300(11%)显示协同作用,161/300(54%)为相加作用。磷霉素与β内酰胺类抗生素之间最常检测到协同作用,包括哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(10/30;33%)、头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(10/30;30%)和替莫西林(8/30;27%)。最常检测到相加作用的是氨曲南(25/30;83%)和美罗培南(25/30;83%),但替加环素(30/30)为 100%无关。没有检测到任何抗生素组合的拮抗作用。MIC 测试条法检测到的磷霉素非敏感性并不常见。当联合磷霉素与其他抗生素治疗更“耐药”的分离株时,协同作用具有可变性。β内酰胺/磷霉素联合治疗的协同/相加作用在所有此类联合治疗中超过 80%,这表明β内酰胺类药物可能是磷霉素的首选联合药物。作用部位不同的药物更可能导致无关。未检测到拮抗作用。