• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两例脾脏肿瘤,其影像学表现不同,需要进行腹腔镜切除以明确诊断。

Two cases of splenic neoplasms with differing imaging findings that required laparoscopic resection for a definitive diagnosis.

作者信息

Hiyama Kazuhiro, Kirino Izumi, Fukui Yasuo, Terashima Hideo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Atago Hospital, Kochi, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Atago Hospital, Kochi, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Apr;93:107023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107023. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107023
PMID:35477212
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9052252/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Splenic tumors are rare and are sometimes found incidentally. In such cases, laboratory tests and imaging studies should be performed based on the diagnostic algorithm to determine whether the tumor is benign or malignant. However, we clinicians sometimes encounter challenging cases. Herein we experienced two challenging cases of splenic tumor which we could not correctly diagnosis preoperatively.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1: A female in her 80s presented to our surgical department to undergo follow-up examinations for Stage IIIa ascending colon cancer. A follow-up CT scan showed marked enlargement of the splenic tumor which suggested metastatic cancer. We performed laparoscopic splenectomy. Case 2: A healthy female in her 50s presented to our internal medicine department to undergo a workup after multiple splenic tumors. A follow-up CT scan showed that the tumors had grown slightly. We could not completely rule out a malignant tumor. She rejected further follow-up study and chose splenectomy.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

We experienced two cases of splenic hemangioma with different clinical presentations and imaging findings. Although some studies have reported that biopsying a splenic tumor is a safe and effective way of distinguishing among splenic tumors, in our country splenic biopsies are seldom performed due to fears of causing intraabdominal bleeding or tumor dissemination. Clinicians should consider whether it would be better to perform follow up with a biopsy or splenectomy as a definitive treatment on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic splenectomy can be used for definitive management in cases involving malignancy or an uncertain etiology.

摘要

引言与重要性

脾脏肿瘤较为罕见,有时是偶然发现的。在这种情况下,应根据诊断算法进行实验室检查和影像学研究,以确定肿瘤是良性还是恶性。然而,我们临床医生有时会遇到具有挑战性的病例。在此,我们经历了两例具有挑战性的脾脏肿瘤病例,术前未能正确诊断。

病例介绍

病例1:一名80多岁的女性因Ⅲa期升结肠癌到我们外科进行随访检查。随访CT扫描显示脾脏肿瘤明显增大,提示转移性癌。我们进行了腹腔镜脾切除术。病例2:一名50多岁的健康女性因多个脾脏肿瘤到我们内科进行检查。随访CT扫描显示肿瘤略有生长。我们不能完全排除恶性肿瘤。她拒绝进一步的随访研究,选择了脾切除术。

临床讨论

我们遇到了两例临床表现和影像学表现不同的脾脏血管瘤病例。尽管一些研究报告称,对脾脏肿瘤进行活检是区分脾脏肿瘤的一种安全有效的方法,但在我国,由于担心引起腹腔内出血或肿瘤播散,很少进行脾脏活检。临床医生应根据具体情况考虑是进行活检随访还是进行脾切除术作为确定性治疗更好。

结论

腹腔镜脾切除术可用于涉及恶性肿瘤或病因不明的病例的确定性治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/d84cdcaf1221/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/1ef6e673f097/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/d4209788c8e7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/bfec1af0b981/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/5686660033a7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/d84cdcaf1221/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/1ef6e673f097/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/d4209788c8e7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/bfec1af0b981/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/5686660033a7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4751/9052252/d84cdcaf1221/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Two cases of splenic neoplasms with differing imaging findings that required laparoscopic resection for a definitive diagnosis.两例脾脏肿瘤,其影像学表现不同,需要进行腹腔镜切除以明确诊断。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Apr;93:107023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107023. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic vascular tumors: report of two cases.手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术治疗脾脏血管肿瘤:两例报告
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003 Aug;13(4):286-9. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200308000-00014.
3
Laparoscopic management of benign splenic tumors in children.儿童良性脾脏肿瘤的腹腔镜治疗
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jul 20;5(4):e000419. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000419. eCollection 2022.
4
Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for splenic lymphangioma: a case report.腹腔镜下脾部分切除术治疗脾淋巴管瘤:一例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2020 Jun 18;6(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s40792-020-00882-1.
5
Laparoscopic splenectomy for inflammatory pseudotumor of the spleen.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗脾脏炎性假瘤
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Nov-Dec;58(112):1909-11. doi: 10.5754/hge10250.
6
Laparoscopic splenectomy for solitary splenic metastasis in a patient with ovarian cancer with a long disease-free interval: a case report.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗卵巢癌伴长无病生存期患者的孤立性脾转移:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2018 May 15;12(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13256-018-1673-4.
7
Laparoscopic middle segment splenectomy for central splenic hemangioma: A case report.腹腔镜中段脾切除术治疗中央型脾血管瘤:一例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;77:925-929. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.10.098. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
8
Port site tumor recurrence rates in a murine model of laparoscopic splenectomy decreased with increased experience.在腹腔镜脾切除术小鼠模型中,随着经验的增加,穿刺部位肿瘤复发率降低。
Surg Endosc. 2000 Sep;14(9):805-11. doi: 10.1007/s004640000231.
9
Laparoscopic splenectomy for solitary splenic tumors.腹腔镜下孤立性脾脏肿瘤脾切除术
Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):2009-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0024-8. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
10
Laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic hamartoma: Case management and clinical consequences.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗脾错构瘤:病例管理与临床后果。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Apr 27;2(4):147-52. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i4.147.

引用本文的文献

1
Unusual presentation of a splenic infarction.脾梗死的不寻常表现。
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Sep 13;19(12):5844-5848. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.124. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Septic shock due to after endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of a splenic mass: A case report.内镜超声引导下脾脏肿块活检后发生感染性休克:一例报告。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 28;27(8):751-759. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i8.751.
2
Evaluation of cross-sectional imaging features that aid in the differentiation of benign and malignant splenic lesions.评价有助于鉴别脾良恶性病变的横断影像学特征。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Mar;136:109549. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109549. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines.
SCARE 2020 指南:更新共识手术病例报告(SCARE)指南。
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:226-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
A case of long-term survival after splenectomy for solitary splenic metastasis from gastric cancer.一例因胃癌孤立性脾转移行脾切除术后长期生存的病例。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep 19;18(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02024-1.
5
Improving diagnosis of atraumatic splenic lesions, part II: benign neoplasms/nonneoplastic mass-like lesions.提高非创伤性脾病变的诊断水平,第二部分:良性肿瘤/非肿瘤性肿块样病变
Clin Imaging. 2016 Jul-Aug;40(4):691-704. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
6
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy using an 18-G core biopsy needle: our experience with 52 cases.使用18G活检针在超声引导下经皮脾穿刺活检:我们52例病例的经验
Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1055):20150400. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150400. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
7
Imaging of the spleen: what the clinician needs to know.脾脏的影像学检查:临床医生需要了解的内容。
Singapore Med J. 2015 Mar;56(3):133-44. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015040.
8
Laparoscopic splenectomy for haemangioma of the spleen.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗脾血管瘤
J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan;10(1):42-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.124475.
9
Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, part 3: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on splenic and nodal findings.管理腹部和盆腔 CT 和 MRI 的偶然发现,第 3 部分:ACR 偶然发现委员会 II 关于脾脏和淋巴结发现的白皮书。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Nov;10(11):833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.020.
10
Image-guided percutaneous splenic interventions.影像引导下经皮脾脏介入治疗。
Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):523-34. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115135.