• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队会议在放疗决策中的实施率和效果:日本单一机构的观察性研究。

Implementation rate and effects of multidisciplinary team meetings on decision making about radiotherapy: an observational study at a single Japanese institution.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2, Iida-nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01849-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01849-y
PMID:35477440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9044833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. Therefore, multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) have been widely used to determine the direction of treatment. However, no standard provisions exist for conducting MDTMs, and recommendations discussed in MDTMs are sometimes not implemented. ​This study analyzed the indications for radiotherapy discussed and recommended at MDTMs, identified the rate of radiotherapy recommendations for patients that were not implemented, and clarified the reasons at a single academic center in Japan.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study that analyzed the minutes and electronic medical records of cases discussed at MDTMs held between April 2012-March 2017 at Yamagata University Hospital. We categorized how radiotherapy was initially presented at MDTMs, determined the rate of radiotherapy recommendations made through MDTMs, analyzed whether treatment recommendations were subsequently implemented, and examined the causes of non-implementation. We performed a statistical analysis to assess some clinical factors (sex, age, number of multidisciplinary team meetings, and classification of planned treatment) associated with the non-implementation of radiotherapy recommendations from MDTMs.

RESULTS

A total of 1813 cases were discussed at MDTMs, of which 71% (1293 cases) were presented with treatment plans, including radiotherapy. Further, 66% (1205 cases) were recommended for radiotherapy through the MDTMs. Recommendations from MDTMs were not implemented in 7% (142 cases). The most typical reason for non-implementation was the clinician's opinion (30%), followed by patient preferences (27%) and disease progression (20%). Change in cancer stage and improvement in symptoms were 12% and 4%, respectively. These ratios were similar each year. We could not find the factors associated with the non-implementation of radiotherapy recommendations from MDTMs.

CONCLUSIONS

MDTMs had a significant effect on the recommendation of radiotherapy for each patient with a tumor. The primary reason for the non-implementation of decisions made at MDTMs was the opinion of clinicians and the patient's preference. These results were similar to previous studies. We need to establish a monitoring system where patients themselves can decide the treatments based on their choices while using the recommendations from MDTMs.

摘要

背景

癌症的治疗需要多学科的综合治疗。因此,多学科团队会议(MDTMs)被广泛用于确定治疗方向。然而,目前并没有关于如何进行 MDTMs 的标准规定,MDTMs 中讨论的建议有时也并未得到执行。本研究旨在分析在日本某一学术中心的 MDTMs 中讨论并推荐的放疗指征,明确未执行 MDTM 推荐的放疗患者比例,并阐明原因。

方法

本研究采用横断面研究方法,分析了 2012 年 4 月至 2017 年 3 月在山形大学医院举行的 MDTM 讨论的病例记录和电子病历。我们根据 MDTM 最初提出的放疗方式对病例进行分类,确定 MDTM 推荐放疗的比例,分析治疗建议是否随后得到实施,并检查未实施的原因。我们进行了统计学分析,以评估一些临床因素(性别、年龄、MDTM 会议次数和计划治疗分类)与 MDTM 推荐的放疗不实施的相关性。

结果

共讨论了 1813 例病例,其中 71%(1293 例)提出了治疗计划,包括放疗。进一步的,66%(1205 例)的病例在 MDTM 中被推荐接受放疗。但 MDTM 推荐的放疗建议中有 7%(142 例)未被执行。未执行的最常见原因是临床医生的意见(30%),其次是患者的偏好(27%)和疾病进展(20%)。癌症分期的变化和症状的改善分别占 12%和 4%。这些比例每年都相似。我们未发现与 MDTM 推荐的放疗不实施相关的因素。

结论

MDTMs 对每位肿瘤患者的放疗建议有显著影响。MDTMs 决策未实施的主要原因是临床医生的意见和患者的偏好。这些结果与之前的研究相似。我们需要建立一个监测系统,让患者自己根据自己的选择决定治疗方案,同时利用 MDTM 的推荐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b22/9044833/16d92af20ae8/12911_2022_1849_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b22/9044833/643bb22e75a1/12911_2022_1849_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b22/9044833/16d92af20ae8/12911_2022_1849_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b22/9044833/643bb22e75a1/12911_2022_1849_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b22/9044833/16d92af20ae8/12911_2022_1849_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation rate and effects of multidisciplinary team meetings on decision making about radiotherapy: an observational study at a single Japanese institution.多学科团队会议在放疗决策中的实施率和效果:日本单一机构的观察性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01849-y.
2
Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study.多学科癌症团队会议中的决策过程质量:一项结构化观察研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 17;17(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3768-5.
3
Input of Psychosocial Information During Multidisciplinary Team Meetings at Medical Oncology Departments: Protocol for an Observational Study.肿瘤内科多学科团队会议期间社会心理信息的输入:一项观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 26;7(2):e64. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9239.
4
Multicentre evaluation of multidisciplinary team meeting agreement on diagnosis in diffuse parenchymal lung disease: a case-cohort study.多中心评价弥漫性实质性肺疾病多学科团队会议诊断协议:病例队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jul;4(7):557-565. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30033-9. Epub 2016 May 11.
5
Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study.血液学多学科团队会议:一项全国性混合方法研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11431-y.
6
Determining Contemporary Barriers to Effective Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Neurological Surgery: A Review of the Literature.确定神经外科有效多学科团队会议的当代障碍:文献综述
World Neurosurg. 2023 Apr;172:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.079. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
Impact of the lung oncology multidisciplinary team meetings on the management of patients with cancer.肺癌多学科团队会议对癌症患者管理的影响。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(2):e298-304. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12192. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
8
How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium.癌症护理中的多学科团队会议有多学科性?比利时弗拉芒地区肿瘤科室的一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 21;12:159-167. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S196660. eCollection 2019.
9
Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.影响肿瘤多学科团队会议质量和功能的因素:系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08112-0.
10
What is the added value of specialist radiology review of multidisciplinary team meeting cases in a tertiary care center?多学科团队会议病例中专科放射学审查的附加值是什么?
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6460-6465. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10680-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors.欧洲多学科肿瘤委员会支持跨境联网,为患有罕见妇科肿瘤的患者增加治疗选择。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Oct 2;33(10):1621-1626. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004599.
2
Lung Cancer Screening: Implementation Challenges and Health Equity Considerations For the Western Pacific Region.肺癌筛查:西太平洋区域的实施挑战与健康公平性考量
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jan;9:e2200329. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00329.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation of oncology multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) recommendations into clinical practice.将肿瘤多学科团队会议(MDM)建议转化为临床实践。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 14;21(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06511-3.
2
Prostate cancer management at an Italian tertiary referral center: does multidisciplinary team meeting influence diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process? A snapshot of the everyday clinical practice.意大利一家三级转诊中心的前列腺癌管理:多学科团队会议是否会影响诊断和治疗决策过程?日常临床实践的一个缩影。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Dec;71(6):576-582. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03231-4. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
3
Cross-sectional increase of adherence to multidisciplinary tumor board decisions.
多学科肿瘤委员会决策的坚持度呈横断面增加。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 29;18(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4841-4.
4
Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study.多学科癌症团队会议中的决策过程质量:一项结构化观察研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 17;17(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3768-5.
5
The Role of Cancer Boards in the Treatment Decisions Regarding Chemotherapy.癌症委员会在化疗治疗决策中的作用。
Intern Med. 2016;55(21):3119-3123. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.7176. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
Predictors of Treatment Decisions in Multidisciplinary Oncology Meetings: A Quantitative Observational Study.多学科肿瘤学会议中治疗决策的预测因素:一项定量观察性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4410-4417. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5347-4. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
Improved outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases in the era of the multidisciplinary teams.多学科团队时代结直肠癌肝转移患者的预后改善
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):403-11. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2459-4. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Differences in practice patterns between urologists and radiation oncologists in the management of localized prostate cancer: a cross-sectional survey.泌尿外科医生和放射肿瘤学家在局限性前列腺癌管理方面的实践模式差异:一项横断面调查。
World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1741-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1543-2. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
9
Thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board routinely impacts therapeutic plans in patients with lung and esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study.胸科多学科肿瘤委员会常规影响肺癌和食管癌患者的治疗方案:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 May;99(5):1719-24. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.019. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review.考虑合并症在多学科癌症团队会议中的治疗决策中的作用:系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1325-32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv025. Epub 2015 Jan 20.