Kaya Emine, Yildirim Sinem
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, IstanbulTurkey.
Eur Oral Res. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):42-48. doi: 10.26650/eor.2022881264.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dentifrices with different fluoride content on color change of restorative materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry.
Three restorative materials (glass hybrid [Equia Forte (EF)], glass carbomer [GCP Glass Fill (GCP)] and compomer [Dyract XP (DXP)]) were used to prepare 120 disc shaped specimens by using a Teflon ring. Four dentifrice groups were created as Sodium Fluoride (NaF), Amine Fluoride (AmF), Stannous Fluoride (SnF2) and no-fluoride (n=40). Simulated tooth brushing was performed for each specimen by applying 6720 strokes for 6 months. Color changes [CIEDE2000 (Δ𝐸00)] were calculated by using generalized linear model procedure and the data were subjected to two-way analysis of variance.
The highest color changes for NaF and AmF dentifrice groups were observed in the GCP restorative material (p<0.05). The color changes of restorative materials tested with SnF2 dentifrice group were statistically different (p<0.05) in each restorative material and Δ𝐸00 values were observed as GCP> EF>DXP. SnF2 dentifrice provided better color stability for all restorative materials when compared to NaF and AmF dentifrices; although, this was not statistically significant. GCP underwent significant discoloration values when brushed with all types of dentifrices.
Although the glass carbomers caused significant color change, the compomers seem to be more resistant to the color change when brushed with all types of dentifrices. The fluoride content of dentifrices is crucial for the color change of restorative materials.
本研究旨在评估不同氟含量的牙膏对儿童牙科常用修复材料颜色变化的影响。
使用三种修复材料(玻璃离子复合体[Equia Forte(EF)]、玻璃卡波姆[GCP Glass Fill(GCP)]和复合体[Dyract XP(DXP)])通过聚四氟乙烯环制备120个圆盘形标本。创建了四个牙膏组,分别为氟化钠(NaF)、氟化胺(AmF)、氟化亚锡(SnF₂)和无氟组(n = 40)。对每个标本进行模拟刷牙,施加6720次刷动,持续6个月。使用广义线性模型程序计算颜色变化[CIEDE2000(ΔE₀₀)],并对数据进行双向方差分析。
在GCP修复材料中观察到NaF和AmF牙膏组的颜色变化最高(p < 0.05)。用SnF₂牙膏组测试的修复材料在每种修复材料中的颜色变化具有统计学差异(p < 0.05),观察到的ΔE₀₀值为GCP > EF > DXP。与NaF和AmF牙膏相比,SnF₂牙膏为所有修复材料提供了更好的颜色稳定性;尽管这在统计学上不显著。用所有类型的牙膏刷牙时,GCP的变色值都很显著。
尽管玻璃卡波姆导致了显著的颜色变化,但在用所有类型的牙膏刷牙时,复合体似乎对颜色变化更具抵抗力。牙膏中的氟含量对修复材料的颜色变化至关重要。