School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, China.
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2022 Aug;25(8):644-648. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of two rigid taping methods, tibial internal rotation taping and external rotation taping, on knee pain during three clinical function tests in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
Repeated measures study.
Fifteen participants (male, height 174.9 ± 5.8 cm, weight 68.3 ± 10.2 kg) with unilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome were treated by applying internal rotation taping and external rotation taping, in randomized order. While taped, participants were asked to perform three clinical tests in random order: single-leg squat, double-leg squat, and quadriceps maximum isometric contraction. Pain was scored using a Visual Analog Scale.
Compared with no taping, both internal rotation taping and external rotation taping significantly improved pain during each of the three clinical tests (F = 224.10, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.94). Furthermore, there was a tape direction effect, where external rotation taping was more effective than internal rotation taping (F = 4.90, p = 0.044, partial η² = 0.26). For each test, the amount of pain improvement after taping was positively correlated with initial pain level (0.539 ≤ rho ≤ 0.921, all p < 0.05).
Both internal rotation taping and external rotation taping were effective in improving pain in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome, and external rotation taping was more effective than internal rotation taping. The significant correlations observed between initial pain levels and pain improvement after taping suggest that those with greater patellofemoral pain achieve greater relief from tibial rotation taping.
本研究旨在评估两种刚性贴扎方法,即胫骨内旋贴扎和外旋贴扎,对髌股疼痛综合征患者三种临床功能测试时膝关节疼痛的影响。
重复测量研究。
15 名(男性,身高 174.9±5.8cm,体重 68.3±10.2kg)单侧髌股疼痛综合征患者接受胫骨内旋贴扎和外旋贴扎治疗,以随机顺序进行。贴扎时,要求参与者以随机顺序进行三项临床测试:单腿深蹲、双腿深蹲和股四头肌最大等长收缩。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛。
与无贴扎相比,胫骨内旋贴扎和外旋贴扎均显著改善了三种临床测试中的每一种测试的疼痛(F=224.10,p<0.001,部分η²=0.94)。此外,存在贴扎方向的影响,其中外旋贴扎比内旋贴扎更有效(F=4.90,p=0.044,部分η²=0.26)。对于每个测试,贴扎后疼痛改善的程度与初始疼痛水平呈正相关(0.539≤rho≤0.921,均 p<0.05)。
胫骨内旋贴扎和外旋贴扎均能有效改善髌股疼痛综合征患者的疼痛,外旋贴扎比内旋贴扎更有效。观察到初始疼痛水平与贴扎后疼痛改善之间的显著相关性表明,髌股疼痛程度较大的患者从胫骨旋转贴扎中获得更大的缓解。