Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Ohyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02632-7.
The clinical efficacy of the Impella for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiogenic shock remains under debate. We thus sought to investigate the protective effects on the heart with the Impella's early use pre-PCI using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI).
We retrospectively evaluated the difference in the subacute phase CMR imaging results (19 ± 9 days after admission) between patients undergoing an Impella (n = 7) or not (non-Impella group: n = 18 [12 intra-aortic balloon pumps (1 plus veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and 6 no mechanical circulation systems]) in broad anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases. A mechanical circulation system was implanted pre-PCI.
No differences were found in the door-to-balloon time, peak creatine kinase, and hospital admission days between the Impella and non-Impella groups; however, the CMRI-derived left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly greater (45 ± 13% vs. 34 ± 7.6%, P = 0.034) and end-diastolic and systolic volumes smaller in the Impella group (149 ± 29 vs. 187 ± 41 mL, P = 0.006: 80 ± 29 vs. 121 ± 40 mL, P = 0.012). Although the global longitudinal peak strain did not differ, the global radial (GRS) and circumferential peak strain (GCS) were significantly higher in the IMPELLA than non-IMPELLA group. Greater systolic and diastolic strain rates (SRs) in the Impella than non-Impella group were observed in non-infarcted rather than infarcted areas.
Early implantation of an Impella before PCIs for STEMIs sub-acutely prevented cardiac dysfunction through preserving the GRS, GCS, and systolic and diastolic SRs in the remote myocardium. This study provided mechanistic insight into understanding the usefulness of the Impella to prevent future heart failure.
Impella 在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和心源性休克中的临床疗效仍存在争议。因此,我们试图通过心脏磁共振成像(CMRI)来研究 Impella 在 PCI 前早期使用对心脏的保护作用。
我们回顾性评估了急性后期(入院后 19±9 天)接受 Impella(n=7)或未接受 Impella(非 Impella 组:n=18[12 例主动脉内球囊泵(1 例加静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合)和 6 例无机械循环系统])的广泛前壁 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的 CMRI 结果差异。在 PCI 前植入机械循环系统。
Impella 组和非 Impella 组的门球时间、肌酸激酶峰值和住院天数无差异;然而,Impella 组的左心室射血分数明显更高(45±13%比 34±7.6%,P=0.034),舒张末期和收缩末期容积更小(149±29 比 187±41 mL,P=0.006:80±29 比 121±40 mL,P=0.012)。虽然整体纵向峰值应变没有差异,但 Impella 组的整体径向(GRS)和环向峰值应变(GCS)明显高于非 Impella 组。与非梗死区相比,在 Impella 组而非非 Impella 组的非梗死区观察到更大的收缩期和舒张期应变率(SR)。
STEMI 患者 PCI 前早期植入 Impella 可通过保持远程心肌的 GRS、GCS 和收缩期及舒张期 SR 来预防亚急性心功能障碍。本研究为理解 Impella 预防未来心力衰竭的作用提供了机制上的见解。