• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚焦超声消融手术联合刮宫术治疗团块型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效及影响因素

[Clinical effect and influencing factors of focused ultrasound ablation surgery combined with suction curettage for the treatment of mass-type cesarean scar pregnancy].

作者信息

Zhu X G, Shi Q L, Deng X L, Xu W, Xue M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.

State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 25;57(4):253-258. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210902-00483.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210902-00483
PMID:35484656
Abstract

To investigate the clinical effect of focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) combined with suction curettage for mass-type cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to analyze the influencing factors of vaginal bleeding and readmission. From January 2014 to December 2020, 88 patients with mass-type CSP were treated by FUAS combined with suction curettage in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The clinical results and the influencing factors of bleeding and readmission for mass-type CSP were analyzed. All the patients underwent one time FUAS treatment successfully. Immediately after FUAS treatment, color Doppler ultrasound showed obvious necrosis and no perfusion area in all lesions, and the blood flow in the mass-type CSP tissue significantly decreased. The median volume of blood loss in the procedure was 20 ml (range: 5-950 ml). Thirteen patients (15%, 13/88) had vaginal bleeding≥200 ml, and 15 patients (17%, 15/88) were hospitalized again. The average time for menstruation recovery was (28±8) days (range: 18-66 days). The average time needed for serum human chorionic gonadotropin-beta subunit to return to normal levels was (22±6) days (range: 7-59 days). The risk of large vaginal bleeding of patients were related to the blood supply of the mass (=5.280, 95%: 1.335-20.858, =0.018) and the largest diameter of the mass (=1.060, 95%: 1.010-1.120, =0.030). The risk of readmission were related to the largest diameter of the mass (=1.055, 95%: 1.005-1.108, =0.030) and the depth of the uterus cavity (=1.583, 95%: 1.015-2.471, =0.043). No serious complications such as intestinal and nerve injury occurred during and after FUAS treatment. FUAS combined with suction curettage is safe and effective in treating patients with mass-type CSP through this preliminary study. The volume of vaginal bleeding are associated with the blood supply of the mass and the largest diameter of the mass, the risk of readmission are related to the largest diameter of the mass and the depth of the uterus cavity.

摘要

探讨聚焦超声消融手术(FUAS)联合刮宫术治疗肿块型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的临床效果,并分析阴道出血及再次入院的影响因素。2014年1月至2020年12月,中南大学湘雅三医院对88例肿块型CSP患者采用FUAS联合刮宫术进行治疗。分析肿块型CSP的临床疗效及出血和再次入院的影响因素。所有患者均成功接受了1次FUAS治疗。FUAS治疗后即刻,彩色多普勒超声显示所有病灶均有明显坏死且无灌注区,肿块型CSP组织内血流明显减少。术中出血量中位数为20 ml(范围:5 - 950 ml)。13例患者(15%,13/88)阴道出血≥200 ml,15例患者(17%,15/88)再次住院。月经恢复平均时间为(28±8)天(范围:18 - 66天)。血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚基恢复正常水平平均所需时间为(22±6)天(范围:7 - 59天)。患者发生大量阴道出血的风险与肿块血供(=5.280,95%:1.335 - 20.858,=0.018)及肿块最大直径(=1.060,95%:1.010 - 1.120,=0.030)有关。再次入院风险与肿块最大直径(=1.055,95%:1.005 - 1.108,=0.030)及子宫腔深度(=1.583,95%:1.015 - 2.471,=0.043)有关。FUAS治疗期间及治疗后未发生肠管及神经损伤等严重并发症。通过本初步研究表明,FUAS联合刮宫术治疗肿块型CSP患者安全有效。阴道出血量与肿块血供及肿块最大直径有关,再次入院风险与肿块最大直径及子宫腔深度有关。

相似文献

1
[Clinical effect and influencing factors of focused ultrasound ablation surgery combined with suction curettage for the treatment of mass-type cesarean scar pregnancy].聚焦超声消融手术联合刮宫术治疗团块型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效及影响因素
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 25;57(4):253-258. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210902-00483.
2
Focused Ultrasound Ablation Surgery combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage in the treatment and management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.聚焦超声消融手术联合超声引导下吸刮术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Mar;258:168-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.031. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.高强度聚焦超声联合刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e854. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000854.
4
Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon successfully prevents excessive hemorrhage combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.库克宫颈成熟球囊联合超声引导下清宫术成功预防剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中大出血。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Jun;43(6):1043-1047. doi: 10.1111/jog.13318. Epub 2017 May 12.
5
Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage at different time intervals for Cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声联合超声引导下清宫术不同时间间隔治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效及安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2388653. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2388653. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
6
Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment.分析剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的类型对高强度聚焦超声联合超声引导抽吸刮宫治疗效果及安全性的影响。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):1449-1457. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2107715.
7
Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.高强度聚焦超声联合子宫动脉栓塞治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的生殖结局分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):883-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
8
Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage.超声引导下吸引刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的疗效及安全性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):511-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.15857.
9
High intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparison of different HIFU sonication strategies.高强度聚焦超声联合超声引导下吸引刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:不同 HIFU 超声策略的比较。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):390-396. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2044078.
10
Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(30):e7687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007687.