• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单绒毛膜三羊膜囊三胎妊娠结局:期待治疗与胎儿减灭术。

Outcome of monochorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies: Expectant management versus fetal reduction.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jul;42(8):970-977. doi: 10.1002/pd.6161. Epub 2022 May 4.

DOI:10.1002/pd.6161
PMID:35484928
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of monochorionic triamniotic (MCTA) triplets managed expectantly with those reduced to twins.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing expectant management (EM) with fetal reduction (FR) to twins in 43 consecutive MCTA triplets with 3 live fetuses at 11-14 weeks between 2012 and 2021.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients managed expectantly and 24 triplets reduced to twins were included. The rate of pregnancy with at least one survivor was 84.2% in the EM group and 66.7% in the FR group (P = 0.190). Compared to the EM cases, triplets reduced to twins had a higher median gestational age at delivery (36.0 vs. 33.3 weeks; P < 0.001), a higher mean birth weight (2244.3 ± 488.6 g vs. 1751.1 ± 383.2 g; P < 0.001) and a lower risk of preterm birth before 34 weeks (11.8% vs. 64.7%; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the risk of miscarriage, pregnancy complications and composite adverse neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In MCTA triplets, FR to twins could reduce the risk of preterm birth, whereas EM seems to be a reasonable choice when the priority is at least one survivor. However, due to the small sample size of this study, these findings must be interpreted with great caution.

摘要

目的

比较期待治疗(expectant management,EM)与减胎至双胎对单绒毛膜三羊膜囊(monochorionic triamniotic,MCTA)三胎妊娠结局的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2012 年至 2021 年间 43 例连续 MCTA 三胎妊娠中 11-14 周时 3 个活胎的病例,将期待治疗(EM)与减胎至双胎(fetal reduction,FR)进行比较。

结果

19 例患者接受期待治疗,24 例三胎妊娠减胎至双胎。在 EM 组中,至少有一个存活儿的妊娠率为 84.2%,在 FR 组中为 66.7%(P=0.190)。与 EM 病例相比,减胎至双胎的中位分娩孕周更高(36.0 周比 33.3 周;P<0.001),平均出生体重更大(2244.3±488.6 g 比 1751.1±383.2 g;P<0.001),且 34 周前早产的风险更低(11.8%比 64.7%;P=0.001)。两组在流产风险、妊娠并发症和复合不良新生儿结局风险方面无显著差异。

结论

在 MCTA 三胎妊娠中,FR 至双胎可以降低早产风险,而当首要目标是至少有一个存活儿时,EM 似乎是合理的选择。然而,由于本研究的样本量较小,这些发现必须谨慎解释。

相似文献

1
Outcome of monochorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies: Expectant management versus fetal reduction.单绒毛膜三羊膜囊三胎妊娠结局:期待治疗与胎儿减灭术。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jul;42(8):970-977. doi: 10.1002/pd.6161. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与期待治疗相比,经胚胎减灭术的三绒毛膜和二绒毛膜三胎妊娠的流产或早产风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1351-1359. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex084.
3
Pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: multifoetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management.体外受精-胚胎移植后双绒毛膜三羊膜三胎妊娠的妊娠结局:多胎妊娠减胎术与期待管理。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2815-4.
4
Expectant management of triplets or multifetal reduction to twins; comparison of preterm delivery and live birth rates.期待管理三胞胎或多胎减少至双胞胎;比较早产和活产率。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Jan;268:18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Perinatal outcomes of fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome in triplet pregnancy: cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis.三胎妊娠中胎儿镜激光手术治疗双胎输血综合征的围产结局:队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):42-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.24887.
6
Birth outcomes of twins after multifetal pregnancy reduction compared with primary twins.多胎妊娠减胎术后与原发性双胞胎的出生结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jan;6(1):101230. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101230. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
7
Expectant management versus multifetal pregnancy reduction in dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplets: Single centre experience.期待治疗与多胎妊娠减胎术在双绒毛膜三羊膜(DCTA)三胎妊娠中的应用:单中心经验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
8
Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of dichorionic and trichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy with multifetal pregnancy reduction: a retrospective analysis study.多胎妊娠减胎术后的双绒毛膜和三绒毛膜三羊膜囊三胎妊娠的妊娠和产科结局:一项回顾性分析研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04617-y.
9
Embryo reduction versus expectant management in triplet pregnancies.三胎妊娠中减胎术与期待治疗的比较
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Oct;16(4):219-22. doi: 10.1080/14767050400013826.
10
Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review.双绒毛膜三胎妊娠:与期待治疗相比,减胎术导致流产和严重早产的风险。一项队列研究和系统评价的结果
BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1053-60. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13348. Epub 2015 Apr 8.