Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
J Vet Intern Med. 2022 May;36(3):1113-1118. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16432. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Board certification relies on passing the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) general examination. Pass rates might depend on properties of residency training programs (RTP).
We hypothesized that <4 weeks of dedicated study time, lack of board preparation lectures, status as a re-taker, and private practice RTP would result in lower pass rates of the ACVIM general examination.
Two hundred forty-eight ACVIM general examinees.
Cross-sectional study. Examinees were surveyed using a Qualtrics survey over a 3-year period. Factors included: study weeks, on-call duty, board preparation lectures, academic or private practice program, and status as a re-taker.
First-attempt examinees were more likely to pass (P < .0001, OR 5.12, 95% CI [2.53, 10.52]). For first-attempt examinees, on-call duty during study weeks resulted in a lower pass rate (P = .002, OR 0.31, 95% CI [0.16, 0.67]). General didactic and specific board-preparation lectures resulted in higher pass rates (P = .003, OR 3.08, 95% CI [1.44, 6.61]; P = .02, OR 3.04, 95% CI [1.20, 7.68]). Diplomate-led board-preparation lectures resulted in higher pass rates than resident-led (P = .007, OR 10.67, 95% CI [1.75, 64.91]). Using a mixed effect logistic model, predicted pass rates were highest with both lack of on-call duty and presence of didactic lectures (predicted pass rate 95%, 95% CI [0.87, 0.98]).
To optimize pass rates, RTP should provide study time without on-call duty. Provision of didactic lectures and specific board-preparation lectures by diplomates assist in candidate preparation.
兽医内科委员会认证依赖于通过美国兽医内科委员会(ACVIM)的综合考试。通过的概率可能取决于住院医师培训计划(RTP)的特点。
我们假设<4 周的专门学习时间、缺乏董事会准备讲座、重考生身份和私人执业 RTP 会导致 ACVIM 综合考试的通过率降低。
248 名参加 ACVIM 综合考试的考生。
横断面研究。在 3 年的时间里,通过 Qualtrics 调查对考生进行了调查。因素包括:学习周数、值班、董事会准备讲座、学术或私人执业项目以及重考生身份。
首次尝试的考生更有可能通过(P<.0001,OR 5.12,95%CI [2.53, 10.52])。对于首次尝试的考生,在学习周值班会导致通过率降低(P=.002,OR 0.31,95%CI [0.16, 0.67])。一般理论和具体的董事会准备讲座会提高通过率(P=.003,OR 3.08,95%CI [1.44, 6.61];P=.02,OR 3.04,95%CI [1.20, 7.68])。由理事领导的董事会准备讲座比由住院医师领导的讲座通过率更高(P=.007,OR 10.67,95%CI [1.75, 64.91])。使用混合效应逻辑模型,预测的通过率最高是既没有值班又有理论讲座(预测通过率 95%,95%CI [0.87, 0.98])。
为了提高通过率,RTP 应提供无值班的学习时间。由理事提供理论讲座和具体的董事会准备讲座有助于考生的准备。