• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在两周等待结直肠癌通道转介的患者中,索引电话咨询的益处。

The benefits of index telephone consultations in patients referred on the two-week wait colorectal cancer pathway.

机构信息

South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Apr;105(4):314-322. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0364. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2021.0364
PMID:35486133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066654/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to hospitals in the UK substituting face-to-face (FtF) clinics with virtual clinic (VC) appointments. We evaluated the use of virtual two-week wait (2-ww) lower gastrointestinal (LGI) clinic appointments, conducted using telephone calls at a district general hospital in England.

METHODS

Patients undergoing index outpatient 2-ww LGI clinic assessment between 1 June 2019 and 31 October 2019 (FtF group) and 1 June 2020 and 31 October 2020 (VC group) were identified. Relevant data were obtained using electronic patient records. Compliance with national cancer waiting time targets was assessed. Environmental and financial impact analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 1,531 patients were analysed (median age=70, male=852, 55.6%). Of these, 757 (49.4%) were assessed virtually via telephone; the remainder were seen FtF (=774, 50.6%). Ninety-two (6%, VC=44, FtF=48) patients had malignant pathology and 64 (4.2%) had colorectal cancer (CRC); of these, 46 (71.9%, VC=26, FtF=20) underwent treatment with curative intent. The median waiting times to index appointment, investigation and diagnosis were significantly lower following VC assessment (<0.001). The cancer detection rates (=0.749), treatments received (=0.785) and median time to index treatment for CRC patients (=0.156) were similar. A significantly higher proportion of patients were seen within two weeks of referral in the VC group (<0.001). VC appointments saved patients a total of 9,288 miles, 0.7 metric tonnes of CO emissions and £7,482.97. Taxpayers saved £80,242.00 from VCs. No formal complaints were received from patients or staff in the VC group.

CONCLUSION

Virtual 2-ww LGI clinics were effective, safe and were associated with tangible environmental and financial benefits.

摘要

介绍

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致英国的医院将面对面(FtF)诊所改为虚拟诊所(VC)预约。我们评估了在英格兰的一家地区综合医院使用电话进行的虚拟两周等待(2-ww)下消化道(LGI)诊所预约的情况。

方法

我们确定了在 2019 年 6 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日(FtF 组)和 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日(VC 组)期间接受门诊 2-ww LGI 诊所评估的指数患者。使用电子病历获得了相关数据。评估了符合国家癌症等待时间目标的情况。进行了环境和财务影响分析。

结果

共分析了 1531 例患者(中位数年龄=70,男性=852,55.6%)。其中,757 例(49.4%)通过电话进行了虚拟评估;其余的则 FtF 就诊(774,50.6%)。92 例(6%,VC=44,FtF=48)患者存在恶性病理学,64 例(4.2%)患有结直肠癌(CRC);其中,46 例(71.9%,VC=26,FtF=20)接受了根治性治疗。VC 评估后,指数就诊、检查和诊断的中位等待时间明显缩短(<0.001)。癌症检出率(=0.749)、接受的治疗(=0.785)和 CRC 患者指数治疗的中位时间(=0.156)相似。VC 组中在两周内就诊的患者比例明显更高(<0.001)。VC 预约为患者总共节省了 9288 英里,0.7 公吨的 CO 排放量和 7482.97 英镑。纳税人从 VC 中节省了 80242.00 英镑。VC 组中没有收到患者或工作人员的正式投诉。

结论

虚拟 2-ww LGI 诊所是有效,安全的,并具有切实的环境和经济效益。

相似文献

1
The benefits of index telephone consultations in patients referred on the two-week wait colorectal cancer pathway.在两周等待结直肠癌通道转介的患者中,索引电话咨询的益处。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Apr;105(4):314-322. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0364. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Video consultation for new colorectal patients.新结直肠患者的视频咨询。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1015-1021. doi: 10.1111/codi.15239. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
The Colorectal Telephone Clinic: a new normal post-COVID-19?结直肠癌电话诊所:新冠疫情后的新常态?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Jul;103(7):520-523. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7070.
4
Telephone triage for 2-week-wait cancer clinics: a viable alternative to face-to-face clinics?2 周等待癌症诊所的电话分诊:面对面诊所的可行替代方案?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Apr;105(4):348-351. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0103. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
5
Clinical effectiveness of and family experience with telephone consultation in a regional pediatric neurosurgery center in the United Kingdom.英国一家区域性儿科神经外科中心的电话咨询的临床效果和家庭体验。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Aug 13;28(4):483-489. doi: 10.3171/2021.3.PEDS20862. Print 2021 Oct 1.
6
Clinical, fiscal and environmental benefits of a specialist-led virtual ureteric colic clinic: a prospective study.专家主导的虚拟输尿管绞痛诊所的临床、财务和环境效益:一项前瞻性研究。
BJU Int. 2019 Dec;124(6):1034-1039. doi: 10.1111/bju.14847. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic telephone two-week-wait referrals in head and neck cancer - how safe were they?2019 年冠状病毒病大流行期间头颈部癌症两周等待电话转诊——它们安全吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2024 Mar;138(3):321-324. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001238. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Patient Outcomes of Virtual Foot and Ankle Telephone Clinics During COVID-19 Pandemic: 1 Year Experience.新冠疫情期间虚拟足部和踝关节电话诊所的患者结局:1 年经验。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 May-Jun;62(3):571-575. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
9
Clinical Safety and Cost-Effectiveness of Follow-up Virtual Clinic for Bladder Outflow Obstruction Surgery.随访虚拟诊所对膀胱流出道梗阻手术的临床安全性和成本效益
J Endourol. 2020 Nov;34(11):1161-1166. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0319. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
10
Time, cost and carbon-efficiency: a silver lining of COVID era virtual urology clinics?时间、成本和碳效率:新冠时代虚拟泌尿科诊所的一线希望?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Sep;103(8):599-603. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0097.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of an Evidence-Based Prioritization System and Electronic Consultation in Early Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.基于证据的优先排序系统和电子会诊在结直肠癌早期诊断中的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 13;12(2):194. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020194.

本文引用的文献

1
[Teleconsultation in a coloproctology unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preliminary results].[COVID-19大流行期间结直肠外科的远程会诊。初步结果]
Cir Esp. 2021 May;99(5):361-367. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Patients' Perceived Satisfaction Through Telephone-Assisted Tele-Consultation During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Period: Observational Single-Centre Study at a Tertiary-Referral Colorectal Surgery Department.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间通过电话辅助远程咨询患者的满意度:三级转诊结直肠外科的观察性单中心研究。
Surg Innov. 2022 Feb;29(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/15533506211008053. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Telehealth practice in surgery: Ethical and medico-legal considerations.外科远程医疗实践:伦理与法医学考量
Surg Pract. 2021 Feb;25(1):42-46. doi: 10.1111/1744-1633.12479. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Virtual Oncology Appointments during the Initial Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Survey of Patient Perspectives.虚拟肿瘤学预约在 COVID-19 大流行初始阶段:一项国际患者视角调查。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 22;28(1):671-677. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010065.
5
Effect of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer care in England.新型冠状病毒肺炎对英国结直肠癌护理的影响。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar;6(3):152-154. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00017-0. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
The Impact of Changes in Service Delivery in Patients With Colorectal Cancer During the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.《COVID-19 大流行初期结直肠癌患者服务提供方式改变的影响》。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021 Jun;20(2):e120-e128. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
7
Risk mitigation for suspected colorectal cancer diagnostic pathway during COVID-19 pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间疑似结直肠癌诊断流程的风险缓解措施
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):e361-e362. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11798. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
8
Video consultation for new colorectal patients.新结直肠患者的视频咨询。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1015-1021. doi: 10.1111/codi.15239. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Understanding virtual urology clinics: a systematic review.理解虚拟泌尿科诊所:系统评价。
BJU Int. 2020 Nov;126(5):536-546. doi: 10.1111/bju.15125. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans.由于 COVID-19 大流行而取消的择期手术:用于为手术恢复计划提供信息的全球预测模型。
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1440-1449. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11746. Epub 2020 Jun 13.