Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2022 Nov 4;30(5):479-483. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riac031.
The potential for the development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) provokes debate about whether long-term treatment with opioids is advisable and effective. If OIH develops during acute administration, will continuation of opioids actually make the pain worse? Hence, it is not surprising that OIH is part of the rationale used to promote deprescribing opioids in patients with chronic pain. But is there evidence that OIH is a clinically relevant phenomenon? This Commentary examines the evidence for OIH in randomized clinical trials in both the acute and chronic settings. Of critical importance in such an assessment is a trial design capable of differentiating OIH, tolerance, withdrawal-mediated pain sensitivity and worsening of the disease. However, studies published to date that purport to give evidence of OIH via experimentally induced pain all lack the rigour needed to differentiate these phenomena. Patient-reported measures of pain and analgesic consumption in these trials are not consistent with the presence of clinically significant OIH. At present, there is insufficient evidence from well-designed clinical trials that OIH is a clinically relevant phenomenon. Hence, while there are other reasons to avoid long-term use of opioids, the potential for the development of hyperalgesia during chronic opioid treatment is not a sound rationale for deprescribing these drugs in patients with chronic pain.
阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏(OIH)的发展潜力引发了关于长期使用阿片类药物是否明智和有效的争论。如果在急性给药期间发生 OIH,继续使用阿片类药物实际上会使疼痛恶化吗?因此,OIH 是促使慢性疼痛患者减少阿片类药物使用的部分理由,这并不奇怪。但是,有证据表明 OIH 是一种临床相关现象吗?本评论研究了在急性和慢性环境中随机临床试验中 OIH 的证据。在这种评估中至关重要的是一种能够区分 OIH、耐受、戒断介导的疼痛敏感性和疾病恶化的试验设计。然而,迄今为止发表的声称通过实验性诱导疼痛来证明 OIH 存在的研究都缺乏区分这些现象所需的严谨性。这些试验中患者报告的疼痛和镇痛药物消耗的测量结果与临床上显著的 OIH 并不一致。目前,来自精心设计的临床试验的证据不足,表明 OIH 是一种临床相关现象。因此,尽管有其他避免长期使用阿片类药物的原因,但在慢性阿片类药物治疗期间发生痛觉过敏的可能性并不是减少慢性疼痛患者使用这些药物的合理理由。