Ribeiro Ana Isabel, Fraga Silvia, Severo Milton, Kelly-Irving Michelle, Delpierre Cyrille, Stringhini Silvia, Kivimaki Mika, Joost Stéphane, Guessous Idris, Severi Gianluca, Giles Graham, Sacerdote Carlotta, Vineis Paolo, Barros Henrique
Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional, Porto, Portugal.
Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional, Porto, Portugal.
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e447-e457. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00036-6.
Few studies have examined the interactions between individual socioeconomic position and neighbourhood deprivation and the findings so far are heterogeneous. Using a large sample of diverse cohorts, we investigated the interaction effect of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation and individual socioeconomic position, assessed using education, on mortality.
We did a longitudinal multicohort analysis that included six cohort studies participating in the European LIFEPATH consortium: the CoLaus (Lausanne, Switzerland), E3N (France), EPIC-Turin (Turin, Italy), EPIPorto (Porto, Portugal), Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (Melbourne, VIC, Australia), and Whitehall II (London, UK) cohorts. All participants with data on mortality, educational attainment, and neighbourhood deprivation were included in the present study. The data sources were the databases of each cohort study. Poisson regression was used to estimate the mortality rates and associations (relative risk, 95% CIs) with neighbourhood deprivation (Q1 being least deprived to Q5 being the most deprived). Baseline educational attainment was used as an indicator of individual socioeconomic position. Estimates were combined using pooled analysis and the relative excess risk due to the interaction was computed to identify additive interactions.
The cohorts comprised a total population of 168 801 individuals. The recruitment dates were 2003-06 for CoLaus, 1989-91 for E3N, 1992-98 for EPIC-Turin, 1999-2003 for EPIPorto, 1990-94 for MCCS, and 1991-94 for Whitehall II. We use baseline data only and mortality data obtained using record linkage. Age-adjusted mortality rates were higher among participants residing in more deprived neighbourhoods than those in the least deprived neighbourhoods (Q1 least deprived neighbourhoods, 369·7 per 100 000 person-years [95% CI 356·4-383·2] vs Q5-most deprived neighbourhoods 445·7 per 100 000 person-years [430·2-461·7]), but the magnitude of the association varied according to educational attainment (relative excess risk due to interaction=0·18, 95% CI 0·08-0·28). The relative risk for Q5 versus Q1 was 1·31 (1·23-1·40) among individuals with primary education or less, but less pronounced among those with secondary education (1·12; 1·04-1·21) and tertiary education (1·16; 1·07-1·27). Associations remained after adjustment for individual-level factors, such as smoking, physical activity, and alcohol intake, among others.
Our study suggests that the detrimental health effect of living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods is more pronounced among individuals with low education attainment, amplifying social inequalities in health. This finding is relevant to policies aimed at reducing health inequalities, suggesting that these issues should be addressed at both the individual level and the community level.
The European Commission, European Regional Development Fund, the Portugese Foundation for Science and Technology.
很少有研究探讨个体社会经济地位与邻里贫困之间的相互作用,目前的研究结果并不一致。我们使用大量不同队列的样本,调查了邻里社会经济剥夺与个体社会经济地位(以教育程度评估)对死亡率的交互作用。
我们进行了一项纵向多队列分析,纳入了参与欧洲LIFEPATH联盟的六项队列研究:瑞士洛桑的CoLaus研究、法国的E3N研究、意大利都灵的EPIC - 都灵研究、葡萄牙波尔图的EPIPorto研究、澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本的墨尔本协作队列研究以及英国伦敦的白厅II研究。本研究纳入了所有有死亡率、教育程度和邻里贫困数据的参与者。数据来源为每项队列研究的数据库。采用泊松回归估计死亡率以及与邻里贫困的关联(相对风险,95%置信区间)(Q1为贫困程度最低至Q5为贫困程度最高)。基线教育程度用作个体社会经济地位的指标。通过汇总分析合并估计值,并计算交互作用导致的相对超额风险以识别相加交互作用。
这些队列总共包含168801名个体。CoLaus研究的招募时间为2003 - 2006年,E3N研究为1989 - 1991年,EPIC - 都灵研究为1992 - 1998年,EPIPorto研究为1999 - 2003年,墨尔本协作队列研究为1990 - 1994年,白厅II研究为1991 - 1994年。我们仅使用基线数据以及通过记录链接获得的死亡率数据。居住在贫困程度较高邻里的参与者的年龄调整死亡率高于贫困程度最低邻里的参与者(Q1贫困程度最低的邻里,每100000人年369.7例[95%置信区间356.4 - 383.2],而Q5贫困程度最高的邻里为每100000人年445.7例[430.2 - 461.7]),但这种关联的程度因教育程度而异(交互作用导致的相对超额风险 = 0.18,95%置信区间0.08 - 0.28)。在小学及以下学历的个体中,Q代表的贫困程度最高组与Q1代表的贫困程度最低组相比的相对风险为1.31(1.23 - 1.40),但在中学学历个体中(1.12;1.04 - 1.21)和大专学历个体中(1.16;1.07 - 1.27)则不太明显。在对个体层面因素(如吸烟、体育活动和饮酒等)进行调整后,关联依然存在。
我们的研究表明,居住在弱势邻里对健康的有害影响在低教育程度个体中更为明显,加剧了健康方面的社会不平等。这一发现与旨在减少健康不平等的政策相关,表明这些问题应在个体层面和社区层面加以解决。
欧盟委员会、欧洲区域发展基金、葡萄牙科学技术基金会。