Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, S10 2RX, UK.
Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Apr 29;15(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06033-z.
Doppler echocardiographic aortic valve peak velocity and peak pressure gradient assessment across the aortic valve (AV) is the mainstay for diagnosing aortic stenosis. Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) is emerging as a valuable diagnostic tool for estimating the peak pressure drop across the aortic valve, but assessment remains cumbersome. We aimed to validate a novel semi-automated pipeline 4D flow CMR method of assessing peak aortic value pressure gradient (AVPG) using the commercially available software solution, CAAS MR Solutions, against invasive angiographic methods.
We enrolled 11 patients with severe AS on echocardiography from the EurValve programme. All patients had pre-intervention doppler echocardiography, invasive cardiac catheterisation with peak pressure drop assessment across the AV and 4D flow CMR. The peak AVPG was 51.9 ± 35.2 mmHg using the invasive pressure drop method and 52.2 ± 29.2 mmHg for the 4D flow CMR method (semi-automated pipeline), with good correlation between the two methods (r = 0.70, p = 0.017). Assessment of AVPG by 4D flow CMR using the novel semi-automated pipeline method shows excellent agreement to invasive assessment when compared to doppler-based methods and advocate for its use as complementary to echocardiography.
经胸超声心动图评估主动脉瓣峰值速度和峰值压力梯度是诊断主动脉瓣狭窄的主要方法。四维血流心血管磁共振(4D flow CMR)作为一种评估主动脉瓣峰值压力降的有价值的诊断工具正在兴起,但评估仍然很繁琐。我们旨在使用市售软件解决方案 CAAS MR Solutions 验证一种新的半自动化 4D flow CMR 方法,以评估峰值主动脉瓣压力梯度(AVPG),并与有创血管造影方法进行比较。
我们从 EurValve 计划中招募了 11 名超声心动图诊断为严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者。所有患者均接受过术前经胸超声心动图、经导管有创心导管术,评估主动脉瓣跨瓣峰值压力降和 4D flow CMR。使用有创压力降法的峰值 AVPG 为 51.9±35.2mmHg,使用 4D flow CMR 法(半自动流水线)的峰值 AVPG 为 52.2±29.2mmHg,两种方法之间相关性良好(r=0.70,p=0.017)。与基于多普勒的方法相比,使用新的半自动流水线方法对 4D flow CMR 进行 AVPG 评估与有创评估具有极好的一致性,并提倡将其用作超声心动图的补充。