From the Section of Vascular Surgery, 21799Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
And the Division of Vascular Surgery, 5635University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2022 Aug;56(6):561-565. doi: 10.1177/15385744221091384. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
We conducted a survey of vascular surgery (VS) trainees and program directors (PDs) to examine differing attitudes regarding pregnancy, starting a family, and work-life balance. A 20 question survey was e-mailed to VS residents (0+5), fellows (5+2) and PDs using Survey Monkey Inc. (San Mateo, California). The survey was sent to 781 participants (608 VS trainees, 173 PDs) with a similar response rate among residents [39% (133/343)), fellows [37% (98/265)], and PDs [38% (65/173)]. Of the 296 total respondents, most were male [61% (181)] and ≤40 years old [81% (240)]. VS trainees and PDs believed their work load or scheduling-coverage issues significantly increased when a trainee or peer was pregnant [PDs = 73% (38/52); fellows = 66% (59/89); residents = 54% (38/71), 13 PDs, 7 fellows and 59 residents had never worked with a pregnant peer or trainee]. Male respondents overall were significantly more likely than females to opine that a pregnant vascular trainee or attending was less capable of performing her job while pregnant [28% (50/179) vs.16% (18/110); = .024). Women overall reported each of the following factors more commonly than men as reasons for delaying childbearing: impairing professional advancement [42% (42/99) vs 14% (23/165); < .001], limited time to devote to children [60% (59/99) vs 39% (64/165); P = .001], not wanting to burden peers or associates [36% (36/99) vs 13% (22/165); < .001), extra stress [67% (66/99) vs 30% (50/165); P < .001], perceived negative view of peers and program directors towards pregnancy [29% (29/99) vs 1% (2/165); < .001], and encouragement not to have children from peers or attending [15% (15/99) vs 2% (3/165); < .001). More females than males overall regret their career choice in VS as it relates to starting a family [22% (24/107) vs. 12%; 21/170); = .028]. When asked about the major barriers for female vascular surgeons who wanted to become pregnant, PDs cited an unsupportive home environment more than trainees [37% (24/65) vs 22% (51/231); P = .015], whereas trainees cited safety concerns affecting the pregnancy, such as radiation, more than PDs [71% (164/231) vs 43% (28/65); < .001] There are significant differences in views toward pregnancy among males and females and among trainees and PDs overall. Contrasting gender-based perceptions of the impact of pregnancy on vascular training need to be addressed before adequate solutions to the challenge of work-life balance can be achieved. Significant opportunities exist for trainees and PDs to address these knowledge gaps.
我们对血管外科(VS)受训者和项目主任(PD)进行了一项调查,以研究他们对怀孕、组建家庭和工作生活平衡的不同态度。使用 Survey Monkey Inc.(加利福尼亚州圣马特奥)向 VS 住院医师(0+5)、研究员(5+2)和 PD 发送了 20 个问题的调查。该调查发送给了 781 名参与者(608 名 VS 受训者,173 名 PD),住院医师[39%(133/343))]、研究员[37%(98/265)]和 PD[38%(65/173)]的回复率相似。在 296 名受访者中,大多数是男性[61%(181)]和≤40 岁[81%(240)]。VS 受训者和 PD 认为,当受训者或同事怀孕时,他们的工作量或排班/覆盖问题显著增加[PDs = 73%(38/52);研究员= 66%(59/89);住院医师= 54%(38/71),13 名 PD、7 名研究员和 59 名住院医师从未与怀孕的同事或受训者一起工作过]。总的来说,男性受访者比女性更有可能认为怀孕的血管受训者或主治医生在怀孕期间的工作能力较低[28%(50/179)比 16%(18/110);=.024)。总的来说,女性比男性更普遍地认为以下因素会影响生育时间:妨碍职业发展[42%(42/99)比 14%(23/165);<.001]、投入子女的时间有限[60%(59/99)比 39%(64/165);P =.001]、不想给同事或同事带来负担[36%(36/99)比 13%(22/165);<.001)、额外的压力[67%(66/99)比 30%(50/165);P <.001]、同事和项目主任对怀孕的负面看法[29%(29/99)比 1%(2/165);<.001)以及同事和主治医生不鼓励生育[15%(15/99)比 2%(3/165);<.001)。与男性相比,更多的女性对她们在 VS 方面的职业选择感到遗憾,因为这与组建家庭有关[22%(24/107)比 12%(21/170);=.028)。当被问及希望怀孕的女性血管外科医生的主要障碍时,PDs 认为家庭环境不支持比受训者更重要[37%(24/65)比 22%(51/231);P =.015],而受训者则认为影响怀孕的安全问题比 PDs 更重要,如辐射[71%(164/231)比 43%(28/65);<.001]。男性和女性以及受训者和 PD 之间对怀孕的看法存在显著差异。在解决工作与生活平衡的挑战之前,需要解决对怀孕对血管培训影响的基于性别的不同看法。受训者和 PD 有很大的机会来解决这些知识差距。