Department of Dermatology, CHU Poitiers (University Hospital Centre), 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86000, Poitiers, France.
Department of Clinical Research, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 Jul;23(4):433-447. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00679-y. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
The decision of when to discontinue systemic treatment after achieving remission in psoriasis is an important question. In this systematic review, we sought to evaluate time to relapse after the discontinuation of systemic treatment in psoriasis patients.
Systematic searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were performed for randomized controlled studies reporting time to relapse after discontinuation of systemic drugs in psoriasis patients. In addition, pharmaceutical companies were contacted by the authors regarding missing data from the identified publications. In each publication, the time to psoriasis relapse and the timing of drug discontinuation were carefully assessed. The level of psoriasis control at the time of drug discontinuation and the definition used for psoriasis relapse were taken into account.
Thirty articles published before April 2021 were included in the systematic review. Four articles focused on conventional systemic treatments with methotrexate and/or cyclosporine, nine focused on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, eight focused on interleukin-17 (IL-17) antagonists, eight focused on IL-12/23 or IL-23 antagonists, and one focused on tofacitinib and apremilast. Different definitions were used to define psoriasis treatment success at the time of drug discontinuation. Similarly, heterogeneous criteria were used to define psoriasis relapse. Comparison between drugs was performed indirectly (i.e. across studies) for most drugs. Considering time of 50% loss of maximum Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) improvement, a shorter median time to psoriasis relapse was observed with traditional systemic treatment (~ 4 weeks) compared to biological agents (from 12 to ~ 34 weeks). When using stringent relapse criteria, such as loss of PASI 90, a longer time to relapse after treatment cessation was observed with IL-23 antagonists (21-42 weeks) versus IL-17 antagonists (7-24 weeks).
Biological agents are associated with a longer time to relapse than oral systemic agents after drug discontinuation. Among biologicals, IL-23 antagonists are associated with the longest time to relapse. These findings may have clinical consequences for the selection of systemic agents when intermittent treatment is necessary.
在银屑病患者达到缓解后决定何时停止全身治疗是一个重要问题。在这项系统评价中,我们旨在评估银屑病患者停止全身药物治疗后复发的时间。
系统检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库中报告银屑病患者停止全身药物治疗后复发时间的随机对照研究。此外,作者还联系了制药公司,以获取已确定出版物中缺失的数据。在每篇出版物中,仔细评估了银屑病复发的时间和药物停药的时间。考虑到停药时的银屑病控制水平和用于银屑病复发的定义。
在系统评价中纳入了 2021 年 4 月前发表的 30 篇文章。4 篇文章集中于甲氨蝶呤和/或环孢素的传统全身治疗,9 篇文章集中于肿瘤坏死因子 (TNF) 拮抗剂,8 篇文章集中于白细胞介素-17 (IL-17) 拮抗剂,8 篇文章集中于白细胞介素-12/23 或 IL-23 拮抗剂,1 篇文章集中于托法替尼和阿普米司特。不同的定义用于定义停药时的银屑病治疗成功。同样,用于定义银屑病复发的标准也存在异质性。大多数药物之间是间接(即跨研究)进行药物比较。考虑到最大银屑病面积严重程度指数 (PASI) 改善的 50%损失时间,与生物制剂相比,传统全身治疗(4 周)观察到银屑病复发的中位时间更短(12-34 周)。当使用严格的复发标准,如 PASI90 丧失时,与 IL-17 拮抗剂(7-24 周)相比,IL-23 拮抗剂停药后复发时间更长(21-42 周)。
与口服全身药物相比,生物制剂在停药后复发的时间更长。在生物制剂中,IL-23 拮抗剂与最长的复发时间相关。这些发现可能对间歇性治疗时全身药物的选择具有临床意义。