Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Nov;25(6):997-1008. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00887-8. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
For patients with psoriasis, discontinuation of biologics following remission has become more common in daily practice.
We aimed to identify predictors and construct a predictive model for time to relapse following withdrawal from biologics.
This 12-year, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in six dermatology centers between February 2011 and February 2024. We identified biological treatment episodes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and included only treatment episodes in which a clinical response (≥ 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score [PASI 50] from baseline) was achieved and the patient withdrew from biological therapy with a well-controlled status (PASI < 10 and ≥ 50% improvement in PASI from baseline). The primary outcome was time to relapse, which was defined as the period from the last biologic administration to relapse. An extended multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap time model) was used to predict relapse and generate a predictive model.
This study screened 1613 biological treatment episodes, and 991 treatment episodes were enrolled. The time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment increased (p < 0.001). Similarly, the time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous biologics used increased (p < 0.001). The maximum PASI improvement during biological treatment decreased and the PASI score at withdrawal of biological treatment increased in parallel as the number of prior withdrawals from biologics increased. The time to relapse following withdrawal was longest for interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (IL-23i), followed by the IL-12/23i, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. After adjustment, multivariate Cox regression identified the following significant predictors of relapse following withdrawal: the mechanisms of action of biologics (hazard ratio [HR] for IL-17i vs IL-12/23i, 1.59; HR for IL-23i vs IL-12/23i, 0.60), number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment (HR 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‒1.33), time to achieve PASI 50 (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00‒1.02), maximum PASI improvement on biologics (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98‒0.99), and PASI at the end of therapy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). The model had good predictive and discriminative ability.
These results have the potential to help physicians and patients make individualized treatment decisions; information on the risk of relapse of psoriasis at specific timepoints following the withdrawal of biologics is particularly valuable for patients considering discontinuation of biologics or as-needed biologic therapy. However, the benefit and risk of repeated withdrawals of biologics should be carefully weighed, as the treatment efficacy and duration of remission decline as the number of withdrawals increases.
对于患有银屑病的患者,在缓解后停止使用生物制剂在日常实践中变得越来越常见。
我们旨在确定生物制剂停药后复发的预测因素,并构建预测模型。
这是一项为期 12 年、多中心、观察性队列研究,在 2011 年 2 月至 2024 年 2 月期间在 6 个皮肤科中心进行。我们确定了中度至重度银屑病患者的生物治疗发作,并仅纳入了达到临床反应(与基线相比,银屑病面积和严重程度指数[PASI 50]降低≥50%)且患者从生物治疗中退出且状态得到良好控制(PASI<10 和与基线相比,PASI 改善≥50%)的治疗发作。主要结局是复发时间,定义为最后一次生物治疗给药至复发的时间段。采用扩展的多变量 Cox 比例风险分析(Prentice-Williams-Peterson 时间间隙模型)预测复发并生成预测模型。
本研究共筛选了 1613 次生物治疗发作,纳入了 991 次治疗发作。随着生物制剂撤药次数的增加,复发时间明显缩短(p<0.001)。同样,随着使用的生物制剂数量增加,复发时间明显缩短(p<0.001)。在生物治疗过程中最大 PASI 改善减少,随着生物制剂撤药次数的增加,生物制剂撤药时的 PASI 评分也相应增加。IL-23 抑制剂(IL-23i)停药后的复发时间最长,其次是 IL-12/23i、IL-17 抑制剂(IL-17i)和 TNF-α 抑制剂。调整后,多变量 Cox 回归确定了停药后复发的以下显著预测因素:生物制剂的作用机制(IL-17i 与 IL-12/23i 的危险比[HR],1.59;IL-23i 与 IL-12/23i 的 HR,0.60)、生物制剂撤药次数(HR 1.23;95%置信区间[CI] 1.13-1.33)、达到 PASI 50 的时间(HR 1.01;95%CI 1.00-1.02)、最大 PASI 改善生物制剂(HR 0.98;95%CI 0.98-0.99)和治疗结束时的 PASI(HR 1.03;95%CI 1.01-1.05)。该模型具有良好的预测和判别能力。
这些结果有可能帮助医生和患者做出个体化的治疗决策;了解银屑病患者在停止生物制剂治疗后的特定时间点复发的风险,对于考虑停止生物制剂治疗或按需生物治疗的患者特别有价值。然而,应该仔细权衡反复撤药的益处和风险,因为随着撤药次数的增加,治疗效果和缓解持续时间会下降。