School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland.
National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jun;113:105381. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105381. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
To identify and synthesise the evidence of midwifery students' views and experiences of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs).
A qualitative evidence synthesis was undertaken using Thomas and Harden's synthesis methods and reported according to the ENTEREQ guidelines.
PubMED, CINAHL Plus, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, Social Science Citation Index (via Web of Science) and Scopus were searched from inception to 19th February 2020 and an updated search was performed on 12th May 2021 to identify qualitative and mixed method studies, reporting qualitative data of undergraduate midwifery students' views and experiences of OSCEs.
Studies were independently screened by title and abstract according to a predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full text review was then conducted independently by two authors. Studies providing qualitative data on undergraduate midwifery students' views and experiences of OSCEs during their midwifery registration education programmes were included. Quality appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Data synthesis was performed using Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis method.
Eleven studies were identified and included. Thematic synthesis identified 13 descriptive themes which translated into four analytical themes that represented midwifery students' views and experiences of OSCEs: the preparation phase, the assessment phase, the feedback phase and the translation phase.
This synthesis offers insight into undergraduate midwifery students' views and experiences of OSCEs and how they are experienced across four phases. This is determined to be a useful structure to guide midwifery educators and researchers in their consideration of the student experience of OSCEs in the future. Midwifery students in this synthesis reported high levels of nervousness, anxiety, and stress during the OSCE process. The findings reveal that there are a number of controllable factors impacting on midwifery students' feelings of safety in the assessment environment, and that these should be addressed to maximise the advantages that the OSCE has to offer in terms of learning and preparation for clinical practice.
识别并综合助产士学生对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的看法和经验。
采用托马斯和哈登的综合方法进行定性证据综合,并按照 ENTEREQ 指南进行报告。
从建库起至 2020 年 2 月 19 日,在 PubMED、CINAHL Plus、Embase、ERIC、PsycINFO、社会科学引文索引(通过 Web of Science)和 Scopus 上进行检索,并于 2021 年 5 月 12 日进行了更新检索,以确定定性和混合方法研究,报告本科助产学生对 OSCE 的看法和经验的定性数据。
根据预定的纳入和排除标准,对标题和摘要进行独立筛选。然后,两名作者独立进行全文审查。纳入本科助产学生在助产士注册教育计划期间对 OSCE 的看法和经验提供定性数据的研究。使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)工具进行质量评估。使用托马斯和哈登的主题综合方法进行数据综合。
确定并纳入了 11 项研究。主题综合确定了 13 个描述性主题,这些主题转化为代表助产学生对 OSCE 的看法和经验的四个分析主题:准备阶段、评估阶段、反馈阶段和翻译阶段。
该综合研究深入了解了本科助产学生对 OSCE 的看法和经验,以及它们在四个阶段中的体验。这被确定为指导助产教育者和研究人员在未来考虑 OSCE 对学生体验的有用结构。本综合研究中的助产学生在 OSCE 过程中报告了高度的紧张、焦虑和压力。研究结果表明,有许多可控因素会影响助产学生在评估环境中的安全感,应加以解决,以最大限度地发挥 OSCE 在学习和为临床实践做准备方面的优势。