Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死高危幸存者的预防性抗心律失常治疗:1个月时死亡率降低,但1年时未降低。

Prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy of high-risk survivors of myocardial infarction: lower mortality at 1 month but not at 1 year.

作者信息

Gottlieb S H, Achuff S C, Mellits E D, Gerstenblith G, Baughman K L, Becker L, Chandra N C, Henley S, Humphries J O, Heck C

出版信息

Circulation. 1987 Apr;75(4):792-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.75.4.792.

Abstract

To determine whether prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy influences mortality in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction, 143 such patients were randomized in a double-blind individually dose-adjusted, placebo-controlled trial an average of 14 +/- 7 days after myocardial infarction and followed for 1 year. Patients were judged to be at high risk on the basis of (1) ejection fraction less than 40% (n = 60), (2) arrhythmias of Lown class 3 or higher (n = 26), or (3) both (n = 57). Aprindine was chosen because of its long half-life, few side effects, and antiarrhythmic efficacy. Baseline characteristics in the treatment arms did not differ. Holter-detected arrhythmias were reduced in aprindine-treated patients at 3 months (p less than .001) and at 1 year (p less than .001). One patient was lost to follow-up; in the remaining patients 1 year mortality was 20% (28/142; 12 aprindine and 16 placebo). There was no significant difference between the two study arms in overall mortality and sudden death. However, among those who died, median duration of survival was longer in aprindine-treated patients (86 vs 21.5 days) (p = .04). Although antiarrhythmic treatment with aprindine of high-risk patients after myocardial infarction does not affect 1 year survival, mortality appears to be delayed; thus there may be a role for short-term treatment before more definitive therapy such as surgery.

摘要

为了确定预防性抗心律失常治疗是否会影响急性心肌梗死后高危患者的死亡率,143例此类患者在心肌梗死后平均14±7天被随机分配到一项双盲、个体剂量调整、安慰剂对照试验中,并随访1年。根据以下标准判断患者为高危:(1)射血分数低于40%(n = 60),(2)洛恩3级或更高等级的心律失常(n = 26),或(3)两者皆有(n = 57)。选择安搏律定是因为其半衰期长、副作用少且有抗心律失常疗效。治疗组的基线特征无差异。在3个月(p <.001)和1年(p <.001)时,安搏律定治疗的患者中动态心电图检测到的心律失常减少。1例患者失访;在其余患者中,1年死亡率为20%(28/142;安搏律定组12例,安慰剂组16例)。两个研究组在总死亡率和猝死方面无显著差异。然而,在死亡患者中,安搏律定治疗的患者中位生存时间更长(86天对21.5天)(p = 0.04)。虽然心肌梗死后高危患者使用安搏律定进行抗心律失常治疗不影响1年生存率,但死亡率似乎有所延迟;因此,在进行手术等更确定性治疗之前,短期治疗可能有作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验