Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Rd, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep;60(7):951-955. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
Skin grafts are commonly used for reconstruction of defects following excision of facial skin cancers. Tie-over bolster dressings are routinely placed to secure these grafts, but are they necessary for healing or graft success?A total of 96 patients was treated from 2013-2019 who underwent full thickness skin graft (FTSG) reconstruction following facial skin cancer excision were retrospectively analysed. All patients were treated by one consultant with non-fenestrated FTSG's placed on defects varying from 10 to 55mm in maximum diameter. Grafts were sutured circumferentially with a continuous resorbable suture. Tie-over bolster dressings were not used, and the recipient site was dressed with Mepiteland Steristrips. Primary defect sites where we used this technique included the pinna, the nose and face, and less commonly, the scalp. Graft harvest sites included the neck, pre-auricular, and submental regions.Complete graft take was noted in 94/96 patients. Partial graft failure was observed in two patients, one who healed and had successful late scar revision surgery and one who was managed conservatively and healed well. Two further patients with complete graft healing later underwent minimal revisional contour surgery with satisfactory results.This retrospective study has shown FTSG success in cutaneous defects of the head and neck to be excellent without the use of tie-over bolsters. This has significant benefits of saving operative time, reducing cost, and sparing the patient both unnecessary intraoperative steps, and the inconvenience of a bolster with its often-painful removal. We recommend that the use of tie-over bolsters in the management of most FTSG reconstructed head and neck cutaneous defects be considered an unnecessary step. We believe there are no adverse effects of our described simple technique, and that there are significant benefits to the patient.
皮肤移植物常用于切除面部皮肤癌后重建缺损。常规使用覆盖加压绷带固定这些移植物,但它们对愈合或移植物成功是否必要?
回顾性分析了 2013 年至 2019 年间接受全厚皮片(FTSG)重建的 96 例面部皮肤癌切除后患者。所有患者均由一名顾问治疗,采用非开窗 FTSG 治疗,最大直径从 10 到 55mm 的缺损。移植物用可吸收缝线连续缝合。未使用覆盖加压绷带,受体部位用 Mepitel 和 Steristrips 包扎。我们使用这种技术的原发性缺陷部位包括耳廓、鼻子和面部,以及较少见的头皮。移植物采集部位包括颈部、耳前和颏下区域。
96 例患者中,94 例完全移植物成活。两名患者观察到部分移植物失败,一名患者愈合并成功进行了晚期瘢痕修复手术,一名患者接受了保守治疗并愈合良好。另外两名完全愈合的患者随后接受了最小的复修手术,结果令人满意。
这项回顾性研究表明,在不使用覆盖加压绷带的情况下,FTSG 在头颈部皮肤缺损中的成功率非常高。这具有显著的益处,节省了手术时间,降低了成本,并使患者避免了不必要的术中步骤和绷带的不便,其通常会引起疼痛。我们建议在管理大多数 FTSG 重建的头颈部皮肤缺损时,考虑不使用覆盖加压绷带。我们认为我们描述的简单技术没有不良影响,对患者有显著的益处。