Katgi Nuran, Çimen Pinar, Çirak Ali Kadri, Şimşek Tarik, Ceylan Kenan Can, Samancilar Özgür, Duman Elif, Erer Onur Fevzi, Tuksavul Fatma Fevziye
Department of Pulmonology, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2022;39(1):e2022005. doi: 10.36141/svdld.v39i1.12293. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Diagnosing of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is difficult and expensive. The standard diagnostical approaches to ILD are bronchoalveolar lavage, transbronchial lung biopsy, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) and surgical lung biopsy (SLB). SLB is gold standard for the confident diagnosis of ILD but because of the poor performance of the patients it's use is limited. We conducted a retrospective study to point out that TBLC plays an important role in diagnosis of ILD and has fewer complications and lower cost than awake video-assisted thoracic surgery (AVATS).
132 patients who underwent TBLC and AVATS with a pre-diagnosis of ILD in our hospital between 2015 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Diagnosis rates, complications and costs were recorded.
There were no non-diagnostic materials in 44 patients in AVATS arm. Prolonged air leak was observed in 11(25.0%) of the patients, and six of them (13.6%) were discharged with Heimlich Valve (HV). Median length of stay in the hospital was 8 days, while average patient cost was $515.9 (415.2-2662.9) in the AVATS arm. Non-diagnostic material was obtained from 10 (11.3%) of 88 patients in TBLC arm. Six (6.8%) of them had pneumothorax, only one of them required a chest tube. No patient was discharged with HV (p=0.001). Median cost for each patient with a median hospital stay of 2.0 (1.0-21.0) (p<0.001) days was $171.9 (80.8-1493.3) (p<0.001).
Although TBLC is behind AVATS in terms of diagnostic accuracy, it may be an alternative diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease due to its acceptable safety profile and cost-effectiveness.
间质性肺疾病(ILD)的诊断困难且费用高昂。ILD的标准诊断方法包括支气管肺泡灌洗、经支气管肺活检、经支气管肺冷冻活检(TBLC)和外科肺活检(SLB)。SLB是确诊ILD的金标准,但由于患者身体状况不佳,其应用受到限制。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以指出TBLC在ILD诊断中发挥着重要作用,并且与清醒电视辅助胸腔镜手术(AVATS)相比,并发症更少,成本更低。
回顾性评估了2015年至2020年期间在我院接受TBLC和AVATS且预诊断为ILD的132例患者。记录诊断率、并发症和费用。
AVATS组的44例患者中没有未获得诊断性材料的情况。11例(25.0%)患者出现了持续性漏气,其中6例(13.6%)患者使用海姆利希瓣膜(HV)出院。AVATS组患者的中位住院时间为8天,而平均患者费用为515.9美元(415.2 - 2662.9美元)。TBLC组的88例患者中有10例(11.3%)获得了非诊断性材料。其中6例(6.8%)出现气胸,只有1例需要放置胸管。没有患者使用HV出院(p = <0.001)。中位住院时间为2.0(1.0 - 21.0)天(p <0.001)的每位患者的中位费用为171.9美元(80.8 - 1493.3美元)(p <0.001)。
尽管TBLC在诊断准确性方面落后于AVATS,但由于其可接受的安全性和成本效益,它可能是间质性肺疾病诊断中的一种替代诊断工具。