Zhou Jianfeng, Nguyen Quan, Kamath Sanjana, Hacohen Yaneev, Zhu Chunchu, Fu Michael J, Daltorio Kathryn A
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Front Robot AI. 2022 Apr 14;9:852270. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.852270. eCollection 2022.
Specifying leg placement is a key element for legged robot control, however current methods for specifying individual leg motions with human-robot interfaces require mental concentration and the use of both arm muscles. In this paper, a new control interface is discussed to specify leg placement for hexapod robot by using finger motions. Two mapping methods are proposed and tested with lab staff, Joint Angle Mapping (JAM) and Tip Position Mapping (TPM). The TPM method was shown to be more efficient. Then a manual controlled gait based on TPM is compared with fixed gait and camera-based autonomous gait in a Webots simulation to test the obstacle avoidance performance on 2D terrain. Number of Contacts (NOC) for each gait are recorded during the tests. The results show that both the camera-based autonomous gait and the TPM are effective methods in adjusting step size to avoid obstacles. In high obstacle density environments, TPM reduces the number of contacts to 25% of the fixed gaits, which is even better than some of the autonomous gaits with longer step size. This shows that TPM has potential in environments and situations where autonomous footfall planning fails or is unavailable. In future work, this approach can be improved by combining with haptic feedback, additional degrees of freedom and artificial intelligence.
指定腿部位置是有腿机器人控制的关键要素,然而当前使用人机接口指定单个腿部动作的方法需要集中精力且要使用双臂肌肉。本文讨论了一种通过手指动作指定六足机器人腿部位置的新控制接口。提出了两种映射方法并在实验室人员中进行了测试,即关节角度映射(JAM)和指尖位置映射(TPM)。结果表明TPM方法更高效。然后在Webots仿真中,将基于TPM的手动控制步态与固定步态和基于摄像头的自主步态进行比较,以测试在二维地形上的避障性能。测试过程中记录了每种步态的接触次数(NOC)。结果表明,基于摄像头的自主步态和TPM都是调整步长以避免障碍物的有效方法。在高障碍物密度环境中,TPM将接触次数减少到固定步态的25%,甚至比一些步长更长的自主步态还要好。这表明TPM在自主落足规划失败或不可用时的环境和情况下具有潜力。在未来的工作中,可以通过结合触觉反馈、额外的自由度和人工智能来改进这种方法。