DiSaia P J, Bundy B N, Curry S L, Schlaerth J, Thigpen J T
Gynecol Oncol. 1987 Mar;26(3):386-97. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(87)90031-x.
A report on a study conducted under the auspices of the Gynecologic Oncology Group on the treatment of women with advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stages IIB, IIIB, IVA) with radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy plus immunotherapy (intravenous Corynebacterium parvum) is presented. There were 283 patients considered evaluable for analysis. Of these, 135 patients were randomized to radiotherapy plus C. parvum (120 patients received at least one course) and 148 were randomized to radiotherapy only. The two treatment regimens were similar for those adverse effects commonly associated with radiation therapy but for hematologic toxicity and fever and/or chills were significantly more frequent among those patients who received C. parvum. There was no statistical difference in the treatment regimens with regard to survival or progression-free interval. Of the 42 patients with positive periaortic nodes, 19% were alive at 3 years. No therapeutic value was demonstrated by combining C. parvum therapy with traditional radiation therapy in advanced cervical cancer. Because of the greater frequency of adverse effects in those patients receiving C. parvum, the further use of C. parvum at this dose and schedule does not appear to be indicated for treating cervical cancer patients.
本文呈现了一份关于在妇科肿瘤学组主持下开展的一项研究的报告,该研究对比了单纯放疗与放疗加免疫疗法(静脉注射短小棒状杆菌)对晚期子宫颈癌(IIB、IIIB、IVA期)女性的治疗效果。共有283例患者被认为可纳入分析。其中,135例患者被随机分配至放疗加短小棒状杆菌组(120例患者接受了至少一个疗程),148例患者被随机分配至单纯放疗组。两种治疗方案在通常与放疗相关的不良反应方面相似,但接受短小棒状杆菌治疗的患者血液学毒性以及发热和/或寒战更为常见。在生存或无进展生存期方面,两种治疗方案无统计学差异。42例腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性的患者中,19%在3年后仍存活。在晚期宫颈癌中,将短小棒状杆菌疗法与传统放疗联合使用未显示出治疗价值。鉴于接受短小棒状杆菌治疗的患者不良反应发生率更高,以该剂量和方案进一步使用短小棒状杆菌似乎并不适用于治疗宫颈癌患者。