Suppr
超能文献

将系统评价和荟萃分析视为等级体系中的顶级是否合理？

Is typifying systematic reviews and meta-analysis as the top on the ladder justified?

作者信息

Raina Sunil K, Kumar Raman

机构信息

Professor & Head Community Medicine, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India.

President, Academy of Family Physicians of India, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Mar;11(3):819-820. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2367_21. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2367_21

PMID:35495801

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9051731/

Abstract

A large number-possibly the large majority-of systematic reviews and meta-analyses produced to date may not be useful for various reasons. This article though not ruling out the usefulness of these, is raising concerns on the way these are conducted or intended for in terms of outcomes.

摘要

到目前为止，大量（可能是绝大多数）已发表的系统评价和荟萃分析可能因各种原因而毫无用处。本文虽不排除这些研究的有用性，但对其开展方式或预期结果提出了担忧。