Novick Peter A, Lee Jacqueline, Wei Sujun, Mundorff Emily C, Santangelo Jessica R, Sonbuchner Timothy M
Department of Biological Sciences and Geology, Queensborough Community College, City University of New York, Bayside, New York, USA.
Department of Biology, Nassau Community College, Garden City, New York, USA.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Apr 7;23(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00292-21. eCollection 2022 Apr.
The article documents students' experiences with the shift online at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and provides informed recommendations to STEM instructors regarding academic integrity and student stress. Over 500 students were surveyed on these topics, including an open-ended question. Students experienced more stress and perceived a greater workload in online courses and therefore preferred in-person courses overall. Personal awareness of cheating during online exams is positively correlated with the proportion of cheating a student perceives. Fear of getting caught is the best cheating deterrent while getting a better grade makes cheating most enticing. Randomization of questions and answer choices is perceived as a highly effective tool to reduce cheating and is reported as the least stress-inducing method. Inability to backtrack and time limits cause students the most stress. Students report that multiple choice questions are the least effective question type to discourage cheating and oral exam questions cause the most stress. Use of camera and lockdown browser or being video- and audio- recorded caused the majority of student stress. Yet, nearly 60% agree that the combination of camera and lockdown browser is an effective deterrent. Recommendations: (i) Be transparent regarding academic dishonesty detection methods and penalties. (ii) Use online invigilating tools. (iii) Synchronize exams and (iv) randomize exam questions. (v) Allow backtracking. (vi) Avoid converting in-person exams to online exams; instead, explore new ways of designing exams for the online environment.
这篇文章记录了学生在新冠疫情初期向线上学习转变过程中的经历,并就学术诚信和学生压力问题向STEM课程教师提供了切实可行的建议。针对这些主题对500多名学生进行了调查,其中包括一个开放式问题。学生们在在线课程中感受到了更多压力,并且觉得工作量更大,因此总体上更喜欢面授课程。学生在在线考试中对作弊的个人认知与他们所感知到的作弊比例呈正相关。害怕被抓是防止作弊的最佳威慑因素,而获得更好的成绩则使作弊最具吸引力。问题和答案选项的随机化被视为减少作弊的一种非常有效的工具,并且被报告为压力最小的方法。无法回溯和时间限制给学生带来的压力最大。学生们报告说,多项选择题是最不利于防止作弊的题型,而口试问题带来的压力最大。使用摄像头和锁定浏览器或进行视频和音频录制给大多数学生带来了压力。然而,近60%的人认为摄像头和锁定浏览器的组合是一种有效的威慑手段。建议:(i) 对学术不端行为的检测方法和处罚保持透明。(ii) 使用在线监考工具。(iii) 同步考试,(iv) 使考试问题随机化。(v) 允许回溯。(vi) 避免将面授考试转换为在线考试;相反,探索为在线环境设计考试的新方法。