• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的80岁以上和80岁以下患者的院内死亡率及临床结局比较

Comparison of In-Hospital Mortality and Clinical Outcomes Between Patients Aged More Than and Less Than 80 Years Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Murthi Mukunthan, Velagapudi Sujitha, Sharma Bharosa, Ezegwu Olisa, Akuna Emmanuel, Park Dae Yong, Atluri Ramtej, Vardar Ufuk

机构信息

Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Apr 27;14(4):e24534. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24534. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.24534
PMID:35497082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9045730/
Abstract

Background The transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure has been increasingly utilized in the management of aortic stenosis among the elderly. In this study, we sought to assess the hospital outcomes and major adverse events (MAEs) associated with TAVR in patients aged ≥80 years compared to those aged <80 years. Methodology We performed a retrospective observational study using the National Inpatient Sample in 2018. We divided TAVR patients into two cohorts based on age, namely, ≥80 years old and <80 years old. The primary outcomes included the comparison of in-hospital mortality and MAEs in the two cohorts. Results We identified 63,630 patients who underwent TAVR from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Among them, 35,115 (55%) were ≥80 years and 28,515 (45%) were <80 years of age. There was a higher rate of post-procedural in-hospital mortality in patients ≥80 years old (1.6% vs. 1.1%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.56, [confidence interval (CI) = 1.13-2.16], p = 0.006). They also had higher rates of pacemaker insertion compared to those <80 years old (7.4% vs. 6.5%, aOR = 1.17 [CI = 1-1.35], p = 0.03). On subgroup analysis, the rates of MAEs were not different between the two cohorts (23.8% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.09); however, patients aged ≥80 years who experienced MAEs had higher in-hospital mortality (5.7% vs. 4.3%, aOR = 1.58 [CI = 1.08-2.32], p = 0.01) and shorter length of hospital stay (7.2 vs. 8.7 days, p = 0.03) compared to those aged <80 years. Anemia, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, and previous stroke were associated with higher odds of in-hospital MAEs in both groups. Conclusions The results of our study show that patients older than 80 years of age undergoing TAVR had higher rates of in-hospital mortality and pacemaker insertion compared to those less than 80 years of age. The rates of MAEs were not significantly different between the two groups.

摘要

背景 经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已越来越多地用于老年主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗。在本研究中,我们旨在评估≥80岁患者与<80岁患者TAVR术后的院内结局和主要不良事件(MAE)。方法 我们使用2018年全国住院患者样本进行了一项回顾性观察研究。我们根据年龄将TAVR患者分为两个队列,即≥80岁和<80岁。主要结局包括两个队列的院内死亡率和MAE的比较。结果 我们确定了2018年1月1日至12月31日期间接受TAVR的63630例患者。其中,35115例(55%)≥80岁,28515例(45%)<80岁。≥80岁患者术后院内死亡率较高(1.6%对1.1%,调整优势比(aOR)=1.56,[置信区间(CI)=1.13-2.16],p=0.006)。与<80岁患者相比,他们起搏器植入率也更高(7.4%对6.5%,aOR=1.17 [CI=1-1.35],p=0.03)。亚组分析显示,两个队列的MAE发生率无差异(23.8%对23.4%,p=0.09);然而,发生MAE的≥80岁患者与<80岁患者相比,院内死亡率更高(5.7%对4.3%,aOR=1.58 [CI=1.08-2.32],p=0.01),住院时间更短(7.2天对8.7天,p=0.03)。贫血、肝病、慢性肾病和既往中风与两组患者院内MAE的较高发生率相关。结论 我们的研究结果表明,与<80岁患者相比,≥80岁接受TAVR的患者院内死亡率和起搏器植入率更高。两组之间MAE的发生率无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/615a299ba817/cureus-0014-00000024534-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/d19ed3a5d2f5/cureus-0014-00000024534-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/084bb621c504/cureus-0014-00000024534-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/e826e87bf92f/cureus-0014-00000024534-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/615a299ba817/cureus-0014-00000024534-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/d19ed3a5d2f5/cureus-0014-00000024534-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/084bb621c504/cureus-0014-00000024534-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/e826e87bf92f/cureus-0014-00000024534-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/9045730/615a299ba817/cureus-0014-00000024534-i04.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of In-Hospital Mortality and Clinical Outcomes Between Patients Aged More Than and Less Than 80 Years Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的80岁以上和80岁以下患者的院内死亡率及临床结局比较
Cureus. 2022 Apr 27;14(4):e24534. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24534. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
The impact of mitral stenosis on outcomes of aortic valve stenosis patient undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.二尖瓣狭窄对接受外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):655-660. doi: 10.1111/joic.12519. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Mediastinal Radiation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在既往纵隔放疗患者中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 23;13(22):2658-2666. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.010.
4
Association of Chronic Kidney Disease With In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.慢性肾脏病与经导管主动脉瓣置换术住院结局的相关性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2050-2060. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.044.
5
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
6
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.非教学医院经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):954-962. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27968. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Impact of varying degrees of renal dysfunction on transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.不同程度肾功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1399-406; discussion 13406-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.065. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
8
Outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement among solid organ transplant recipients.实体器官移植受者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的结局比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;97(4):691-698. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29426. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
Outcomes of urgent versus nonurgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.紧急与非紧急经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):189-195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28563. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.美国女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的医院治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):813-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27362. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Geriatric Workup and Frailty Assessment in Older Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的综合老年医学检查与衰弱评估
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):4169. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144169.
2
Racial Disparities in Patients With COVID-19 Infection: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.2019冠状病毒病感染患者的种族差异:一项全国住院患者样本分析。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):e35039. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35039. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Age is no factor in TAVI.年龄并非经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的影响因素。

本文引用的文献

1
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Necessary Evil Perhaps But Are We Making Progress?经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的起搏器植入:或许是一种必要之恶,但我们有进展吗?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e016700. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016700. Epub 2020 May 2.
3
Neth Heart J. 2022 Oct;30(10):447-448. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01725-4. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Temporal Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.
90 岁以上患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的时间趋势和临床转归。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013685. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013685. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
In-Hospital Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians.八旬患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e011206. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011206.
5
Anaemia and mortality in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的贫血与死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Cardiol. 2019 Oct;74(5):386-392. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1510802. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Prognosis Markers of Patients With Liver Disease Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗肝病患者的临床转归和预后标志物:倾向评分匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar;11(3):e005727. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005727.
7
Outcomes of surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-surgery still the gold standard?八旬老人行外科主动脉瓣置换术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结局——外科手术仍是金标准吗?
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep;6(5):453-462. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.08.01.
8
Prognostic impact of anemia and iron-deficiency anemia in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.在接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的当代患者队列中,贫血和缺铁性贫血的预后影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
9
Impact of Liver Indicators on Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.肝脏指标对经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者临床结局的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;104(4):1357-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.075. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
Heyde syndrome revisited: anaemia and aortic stenosis.再探海德综合征:贫血与主动脉瓣狭窄
Intern Med J. 2017 Jul;47(7):814-818. doi: 10.1111/imj.13419.