Parinyarux Pantira, Yotsombut Kitiyot
Ph.D. Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Payap University. Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Ph.D. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok, Thailand.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Jan-Mar;20(1):2601. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.1.2601. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
The Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) standards in Thailand have been legally implemented for all drugstores since 2014. However, customer satisfaction has not been studied. This research aimed to explore the satisfaction of the customers with the facilities and services received from drugstores under the GPP standards and examine the impact of satisfaction toward each GPP domain on overall satisfaction (OS) and the intention to receive the pharmacy services as the first choice in the case of common and non-serious illnesses (IntR).
This research was a cross-sectional survey study. The Google Forms for data collection was distributed via the online social media between June and August 2021. The satisfaction toward OS, IntR, and the GPP domains; places and equipment (PE), personnel (P), quality control (QC), and pharmacy services (PS) were collected using 5-Likert scales. Descriptive statistics, intra-class correlation, and multiple regression were used in data analysis with statistical significance at p-value<0.05.
Three hundred and eighty-eight drugstore's customers responded to the questionnaires. Most customers rated the OS and the IntR at the highest level. The mean of the OS was 4.4±0.7 and the IntR was 4.6±0.7 points out of five. The OS and the IntR were highly correlated with the ICC of 0.719 (p-value<0.001). The satisfactions toward each GPP criteria were ranged between 3.9±0.9 to 4.6±0.7 indicating high levels of satisfaction. All 4 domains of the GPP standards explained the OS and the IntR with R square at 0.541 and 0.363, respectively. However, only PS and PE impacted the OS and only QC and PS impacted the IntR with statistical significance.
Thai customers had high levels of the OS and the IntR toward drugstore facilities and services based on the GPP standards. The PS was the domain that statistically influenced both the OS and the IntR, whereas the PE and the QC also statistically influenced the OS and the IntR, respectively. Since PE was the most weighted domain for current inspection, PS and QC should be more emphasized in future revision of the GPP inspection.
泰国自2014年起已对所有药店依法实施《良好药房规范》(GPP)标准。然而,尚未对顾客满意度进行研究。本研究旨在探讨顾客对符合GPP标准的药店所提供设施和服务的满意度,并考察各GPP领域的满意度对总体满意度(OS)以及在常见非严重疾病情况下首选接受药房服务的意愿(IntR)的影响。
本研究为横断面调查研究。2021年6月至8月期间,通过在线社交媒体分发用于数据收集的谷歌表单。使用5级李克特量表收集对OS、IntR以及GPP领域(场所与设备(PE)、人员(P)、质量控制(QC)和药房服务(PS))的满意度。数据分析采用描述性统计、组内相关性和多元回归,p值<0.05具有统计学意义。
388名药店顾客回复了问卷。大多数顾客对OS和IntR的评价为最高水平。OS的均值为4.4±0.7,IntR的均值为4.6±0.7(满分5分)。OS和IntR高度相关,组内相关系数(ICC)为0.719(p值<0.001)。对各GPP标准的满意度在3.9±0.9至4.6±0.7之间,表明满意度较高。GPP标准的所有4个领域对OS和IntR的解释力,决定系数(R方)分别为0.541和0.363。然而,只有PS和PE对OS有影响,只有QC和PS对IntR有统计学意义上的影响。
泰国顾客对基于GPP标准的药店设施和服务的OS和IntR水平较高。PS是对OS和IntR均有统计学影响的领域,而PE和QC分别对OS和IntR也有统计学影响。由于PE是当前检查中权重最大的领域,在未来修订GPP检查时应更加强调PS和QC。