Saqi Anjali, Leslie Kevin O, Moreira Andre L, Lantuejoul Sylvie, Shu Catherine Ann, Rizvi Naiyer A, Sonett Joshua R, Tajima Kosei, Sun Shawn W, Gitlitz Barbara J, Colby Thomas V
Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Mar 19;3(5):100310. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100310. eCollection 2022 May.
The efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment for NSCLC can be pathologically assessed in resected tissue. Major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as less than or equal to 10% and 0% viable tumor cells, respectively, are increasingly being used in NSCLC clinical trials to establish them as surrogate end points for efficacy to shorten time to outcome. Nevertheless, sampling and MPR calculation methods vary between studies. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recently published detailed recommendations for pathologic assessment of NSCLC after neoadjuvant treatment, with methodology being critical. To increase methodological rigor further, we developed a novel MPR calculator tool (MPRCT) for standardized, comprehensive collection of percentages of viable tumor, necrosis, and stroma in the tumor bed. In addition, tumor width and length in the tumor bed are measured and unweighted and weighted MPR averages are calculated, the latter to account for the varying proportions of tumor beds on slides. We propose sampling the entire visible tumor bed for tumors having pCR regardless of size, 100% of tumors less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter, and at least 50% of tumors more than 3 cm. We describe the uses of this tool, including potential formal analyses of MPRCT data to determine the optimum sampling strategy that balances sensitivity against excessive use of resources. Solutions to challenging scenarios in pathologic assessment are proposed. This MPRCT will facilitate standardized, systematic, comprehensive collection of pathologic response data with a standardized methodology to validate studies designed to establish MPR and pCR as surrogate end points of neoadjuvant treatment efficacy.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)新辅助治疗的疗效可在切除组织中进行病理评估。主要病理反应(MPR)和病理完全缓解(pCR)分别定义为存活肿瘤细胞小于或等于10%和0%,在NSCLC临床试验中越来越多地被用作替代疗效终点,以缩短得出结果的时间。然而,不同研究之间的取样和MPR计算方法各不相同。国际肺癌研究协会最近发布了关于NSCLC新辅助治疗后病理评估的详细建议,其中方法学至关重要。为了进一步提高方法的严谨性,我们开发了一种新型的MPR计算器工具(MPRCT),用于标准化、全面地收集肿瘤床中存活肿瘤、坏死和基质的百分比。此外,测量肿瘤床的肿瘤宽度和长度,并计算未加权和加权的MPR平均值,后者用于考虑载玻片上肿瘤床比例的差异。对于pCR的肿瘤,无论大小,我们建议对整个可见肿瘤床进行取样;对于直径小于或等于3 cm的肿瘤,取样100%;对于直径大于3 cm的肿瘤,取样至少50%。我们描述了该工具的用途,包括对MPRCT数据进行潜在的正式分析,以确定在敏感性与资源过度使用之间取得平衡的最佳取样策略。针对病理评估中具有挑战性的情况提出了解决方案。这种MPRCT将有助于以标准化方法进行标准化、系统、全面的病理反应数据收集,以验证旨在将MPR和pCR确立为新辅助治疗疗效替代终点的研究。