Endocrinology Division, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.
International Center for T1D, Centro di Ricerca Pediatrica Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 14;13:816599. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.816599. eCollection 2022.
Predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems may improve glucose control and quality of life in type 1 diabetic individuals. This is a cross-sectional, single-center study to compare the effect on metabolic control and glucose variability of PLGS and HCL systems as compared to standard sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy.
We retrospectively analyzed 136 adults (men/women 69/67, mean age 47.3 ± 13.9 years) with T1D on insulin pump therapy, divided accordingly to type of insulin pump system (: SAP, 24 subjects; : PLGS, 49 subjects; : HCL, 63 subjects). The groups were matched for age, gender, years of disease, years of CSII use, and CGM wear time.
The analysis of CGM metrics, in the three groups, showed a statistically significant different percentage of time within the target range, defined as 70-180 mg/dl, with a higher percentage in group 3 and significantly less time spent in the hypoglycemic range in groups 2 and 3. The three groups were statistically different also for the glucose management indicator and coefficient of variation percentage, which were progressively lower moving from group 1 to group 3. In the HCL group, 52.4% of subjects reached a percentage of time passed in the euglycemic range above 70%, as compared to 32.7% in those with PLGS and 20.2% in those with SAP. A positive correlation between the higher percentage of TIR and the use of auto-mode was evident in the HCL group. Finally, the three groups did not show any statistical differences regarding the quality-of-life questionnaire, but there was a significant negative correlation between CV and perceived CSII-use convenience (r = -0.207, p = 0.043).
HCL systems were more effective in improving glucose control and in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes, thereby mitigating risk for acute and chronic complications and positively affecting diabetes technologies' acceptance.
预测性低血糖暂停(PLGS)和混合闭环(HCL)系统可能改善 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和生活质量。这是一项横断面、单中心研究,旨在比较 PLGS 和 HCL 系统与标准传感器增强型泵(SAP)治疗相比,对代谢控制和血糖变异性的影响。
我们回顾性分析了 136 名接受胰岛素泵治疗的 1 型糖尿病成人(男/女 69/67,平均年龄 47.3±13.9 岁),根据胰岛素泵系统类型进行分组(:SAP,24 例;:PLGS,49 例;:HCL,63 例)。这些组在年龄、性别、疾病年限、CSII 使用年限和 CGM 佩戴时间方面相匹配。
在三组中,CGM 指标的分析显示,在目标范围内的时间百分比有统计学显著差异,定义为 70-180mg/dl,组 3 的百分比更高,组 2 和组 3 的低血糖时间明显减少。三组在血糖管理指标和变异系数百分比方面也存在统计学差异,从组 1 到组 3 逐渐降低。在 HCL 组中,52.4%的受试者达到了 70%以上的时间处于正常血糖范围内,而 PLGS 组为 32.7%,SAP 组为 20.2%。HCL 组中,TIR 百分比越高,自动模式使用的相关性越明显。最后,三组在生活质量问卷方面没有显示出任何统计学差异,但 CV 与感知 CSII 使用便利性之间存在显著的负相关(r=-0.207,p=0.043)。
HCL 系统在改善 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和降低低血糖风险方面更有效,从而降低急性和慢性并发症的风险,并对糖尿病技术的接受产生积极影响。