• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 型糖尿病不同技术模式的真实世界结局。

Real-world outcomes with different technology modalities in type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Endocrinology and Nutrition Department. Badajoz University Hospital, Badajoz, Spain.

Endocrinology and Nutrition Department. Badajoz University Hospital, Badajoz, Spain.

出版信息

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 7;31(6):1845-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.028
PMID:33838993
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Several treatment modalities are available for type 1 diabetes (T1D), including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) with MDI, sensor-augmented pumps with predictive low-glucose suspend function (SAP-PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop systems (HCL). The aim of the study was to evaluate the real-world benefits obtained with these treatment modalities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cross-sectional study was performed, selecting 4 groups of T1D subjects, regarding their treatment modalities, paired by age, sex and diabetes duration. A comparison was performed, concerning time in different glucose ranges in 2-week sensor downloads. Estimated HbA1c, glycaemic variability measures and sensor use were also compared. 302 T1D people were included (age: 39 ± 12 years, 47% male, diabetes duration: 21 ± 10 years, estimated HbA1c: 7.28 ± 0.84% (56 ± 9 mmol/mol), baseline HbA1c: 7.4 ± 1.0% (57 ± 11 mmol/mol), length of use of the device 8 [3-21] months). Group 1 (CGM + MDI) and 2 (FGM + MDI) showed no differences in time in different glucose ranges. Group 4 (HCL) showed a higher time 70-180 mg/dl and a lower time in hypoglycaemia than group 3 (SAP-PLGS). Group 1 and 2 showed lower time 70-180 mg/dl, higher time in hyperglycaemia and higher glycaemic variability measures than group 3. Group 4 was superior to groups 1 and 2 in all the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Real-life achievements in glycaemic control and glycaemic variability are described. HCL offer the maximum benefit in terms of time in range and hypoglycaemia protection, compared to CGM + MDI, FGM + MDI and SAP-PLGS.

摘要

背景与目的

1 型糖尿病(T1D)有多种治疗方法,包括连续血糖监测(CGM)和基于 MDI 的瞬感血糖监测(FGM)、具有预测性低血糖暂停功能的传感器增强型泵(SAP-PLGS)和混合闭环系统(HCL)。本研究旨在评估这些治疗方法的实际获益。

方法与结果

本研究采用了一项横断面研究,根据治疗方法将 4 组 T1D 患者分为年龄、性别和糖尿病病程相匹配的两组。比较了两周内传感器下载时不同血糖范围内的时间分布。还比较了估计的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血糖变异性指标和传感器使用情况。共纳入 302 名 T1D 患者(年龄:39±12 岁,47%为男性,糖尿病病程:21±10 年,估计的 HbA1c:7.28±0.84%(56±9mmol/mol),基线 HbA1c:7.4±1.0%(57±11mmol/mol),设备使用时长 8[3-21]个月)。组 1(CGM+MDI)和组 2(FGM+MDI)在不同血糖范围内的时间无差异。组 4(HCL)在 70-180mg/dl 血糖范围内的时间更长,低血糖时间更短,而组 3(SAP-PLGS)则相反。组 1 和组 2 的 70-180mg/dl 血糖范围内的时间更短,高血糖时间更长,血糖变异性指标更高。与组 1 和组 2 相比,组 4 在所有结果上均具有优势。

结论

描述了在血糖控制和血糖变异性方面的实际成果。与 CGM+MDI、FGM+MDI 和 SAP-PLGS 相比,HCL 在血糖达标时间和低血糖保护方面具有最大获益。

相似文献

1
Real-world outcomes with different technology modalities in type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病不同技术模式的真实世界结局。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 7;31(6):1845-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.实时连续血糖监测在 1 型糖尿病中的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Apr;58(4):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01589-3. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
The Medtronic 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop system achieves and maintains good glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes adults despite previous treatment.美敦力780G先进混合闭环系统在1型糖尿病成人患者中,即便此前接受过治疗,仍能实现并维持良好的血糖控制。
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2023 Feb;70(2):130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2022.10.005.
4
Switching from Suspend-Before-Low Insulin Pump Technology to a Hybrid Closed-Loop System Improves Glucose Control and Reduces Glucose Variability: A Retrospective Observational Case-Control Study.从预混胰岛素泵技术切换到混合闭环系统可改善血糖控制并降低血糖变异性:一项回顾性观察性病例对照研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Apr;22(4):321-325. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0302. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
One-year experience of hybrid closed-loop system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes previously treated with multiple daily injections: drivers to successful outcomes.1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年使用混合闭环系统治疗 1 年的经验:取得成功的驱动因素。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Feb;58(2):207-213. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01607-4. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Older Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Using Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin: Results From the DIAMOND Trial.使用多次每日胰岛素注射的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病老年人的连续血糖监测:DIAMOND 试验结果
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1138-1146. doi: 10.1177/1932296817704445. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
7
Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较糖尿病胰岛素输送和血糖监测方法的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 4;157(5):336-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00508.
8
Effect of predicted low suspend pump treatment on improving glycaemic control and quality of sleep in children with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: the QUEST randomized crossover study.预测性低悬浮泵治疗对改善1型糖尿病儿童及其照顾者血糖控制和睡眠质量的影响:QUEST随机交叉研究
Trials. 2018 Dec 4;19(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3034-4.
9
Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop in Adult Population With Type 1 Diabetes: A Substudy From the ADAPT Randomized Controlled Trial in Users of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring.成人 1 型糖尿病患者的高级混合闭环:实时连续血糖监测使用者 ADAPT 随机对照试验的子研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1132-1138. doi: 10.1177/19322968231161320. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
10
Cost-effectiveness of sensor-augmented pump therapy in two different patient populations with type 1 diabetes in Italy.意大利两种不同1型糖尿病患者群体中传感器增强泵治疗的成本效益
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jul;28(7):707-715. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Metabolic Control Between Different Insulin Use Patterns in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Through Intermittent Glucose Monitoring.通过间歇性血糖监测评估1型糖尿病患儿不同胰岛素使用模式下的代谢控制差异
Diseases. 2025 Aug 9;13(8):254. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080254.
2
Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling.用于管理1型糖尿病患者血糖水平的混合闭环系统:系统评价与经济建模
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(80):1-190. doi: 10.3310/JYPL3536.
3
Glucose metrics and device satisfaction in adults with type 1 diabetes using different treatment modalities: a multicenter, real-world observational study.
1型糖尿病成人患者使用不同治疗方式时的血糖指标与设备满意度:一项多中心、真实世界观察性研究
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Apr;62(4):563-573. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02381-3. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and its Glucometrics in Clinical Practice in Spain and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.西班牙临床实践中连续血糖监测及其血糖指标的影响和未来展望:叙述性综述。
Adv Ther. 2024 Sep;41(9):3471-3488. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02943-5. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
Exploring the Impact of Glycemic Control on Diabetic Retinopathy: Emerging Models and Prognostic Implications.探索血糖控制对糖尿病视网膜病变的影响:新兴模型及预后意义
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 31;13(3):831. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030831.
6
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Is Age at Onset a Determining Factor in Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy?儿童1型糖尿病:发病年龄是先进混合闭环胰岛素治疗的决定因素吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 6;12(21):6951. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216951.
7
Incidence, prevalence and care of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents in Germany: Time trends and regional socioeconomic situation.德国儿童和青少年1型糖尿病的发病率、患病率及护理:时间趋势与地区社会经济状况
J Health Monit. 2023 Jun 14;8(2):57-78. doi: 10.25646/11439. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Impact on glucometric variables and quality of life of the advanced hybrid closed-loop system in pediatric and adolescent type 1 diabetes.先进的混合闭环系统对儿科和青少年 1 型糖尿病患者血糖变量和生活质量的影响。
J Diabetes. 2023 Aug;15(8):699-708. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13426. Epub 2023 Jun 19.