Hagy Iii James D, Houghton Katelyn A, Beddick David L, James Joseph B, Friedman Stephanie D, Devereux Richard
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Gulf Environmental Measurement and Modeling Division, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561 USA.
Present address: Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329 USA,
Freshw Sci. 2020 May 5;39(2):292-308. doi: 10.1086/708935.
Nutrient (nitrogen [N] and phosphorus [P]) pollution is a pervasive water quality issue in the USA for small streams and rivers. The effect of nutrients on the biotic condition of streams is often evaluated with biological indicators such as macroinvertebrate assemblages or periphyton assemblages, particularly diatoms. Molecular approaches facilitate the use of periphyton assemblages as bioindicators because periphyton is diverse and its composition as a whole, rather than just diatoms, soft-bodied algae, or any single group, may convey additional information about responses to nutrients. To further develop the concept that a taxonomically-broad evaluation of periphyton assemblages could be useful for developing stream bioindicators, we examined microbial assemblage composition with both 16S and 18S rRNA genes, enabling us to evaluate composition in 3 domains. We measured otherwise unknown nutrient responses of different periphyton groups in situ with experiments that used glass fiber filters to allow diffusion of amended nutrients into a stream. We deployed these experimental setups in 2 streams that differ in the extent of agricultural land-use in their catchments in the southeastern USA. Experiments consisted of controls, N amendments, P amendments, and both N and P amendments. Periphyton assemblages that grew on the filters differed significantly by stream, date or season, and nutrient treatment. Assemblage differences across treatments were more consistent among Bacteria and Archaea than among eukaryotes. Effects of nutrient amendments were more pronounced in the stream with less agricultural land use and, therefore, lower nutrient loading than in the stream with more agricultural land use and higher nutrient loading. Combined N and P amendments decreased species richness and evenness for Bacteria and Archaea by ∼36 and ∼9%, respectively, compared with controls. Indicator species analysis revealed that specific clades varied in their response to treatments. Indicators based on the responses of these indicator clades were related to nutrient treatments across sites and seasons. Analyses that included all the taxa in a domain did not resolve differences in responses to N vs P. Instead, better resolution was achieved with an analysis focused on diatoms, which responded more strongly to P than N. Overall, our results showed that in situ nutrient-diffusing substrate experiments are a useful approach for describing assemblage responses to nutrients in streams. This type of molecular approach may be useful to environmental agencies and stakeholders responsible for assessing and managing stream water quality and biotic condition.
营养物质(氮 [N] 和磷 [P])污染是美国中小河流普遍存在的水质问题。营养物质对溪流生物状况的影响通常使用大型无脊椎动物群落或周丛生物群落等生物指标来评估,特别是硅藻。分子方法有助于将周丛生物群落用作生物指标,因为周丛生物种类多样,其整体组成而非仅仅是硅藻、软体藻类或任何单一群体,可能会传达有关对营养物质反应的更多信息。为了进一步发展对周丛生物群落进行分类学广泛评估可用于开发溪流生物指标这一概念,我们用 16S 和 18S rRNA 基因研究了微生物群落组成,使我们能够评估三个域中的组成。我们通过使用玻璃纤维滤器的实验原位测量了不同周丛生物群体对营养物质的未知反应,以使添加的营养物质扩散到溪流中。我们将这些实验装置部署在美国东南部流域农业土地利用程度不同的两条溪流中。实验包括对照、氮添加、磷添加以及氮和磷同时添加。在滤器上生长的周丛生物群落在溪流、日期或季节以及营养处理方面存在显著差异。细菌和古菌处理间的群落差异比真核生物间更一致。营养添加的影响在农业土地利用较少、因此营养负荷较低的溪流中比在农业土地利用较多、营养负荷较高的溪流中更明显。与对照相比,氮和磷同时添加使细菌和古菌的物种丰富度和均匀度分别降低了约 36% 和 9%。指示物种分析表明特定进化枝对处理的反应各不相同。基于这些指示进化枝反应的指标与不同地点和季节的营养处理相关。包含一个域中所有分类单元的分析未能分辨对氮和磷反应的差异。相反,专注于硅藻的分析获得了更好的分辨率,硅藻对磷的反应比对氮更强烈。总体而言,我们的结果表明原位营养物质扩散底物实验是描述溪流中生物群落对营养物质反应的有用方法。这种分子方法可能对负责评估和管理溪流水质及生物状况的环境机构和利益相关者有用。