Suppr超能文献

应用显微镜进行质量评估,比较基于 PCR 的症候群检测与细菌培养对疑似肺炎患者的检测性能。

Performance of PCR-based syndromic testing compared to bacterial culture in patients with suspected pneumonia applying microscopy for quality assessment.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

APMIS. 2022 Jul;130(7):417-426. doi: 10.1111/apm.13232. Epub 2022 May 22.

Abstract

Syndromic testing for lower respiratory tract infections with BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel Plus (BF) detects 27 pathogens with a turn-around-time of one hour. We compared the performance of BF with culture. Samples from 298 hospitalized patients with suspected pneumonia routinely sent for culture were also analyzed using BF. Retrospectively, patients were clinically categorized as having "pneumonia" or "no pneumonia." BF and culture were compared by analytical performance, which was evaluated by pathogen concordance, and by clinical performance by comparing pathogen detections in patients with and without pneumonia. The BF results for viruses and atypical bacteria were not included in the performance analysis. In 298 patient samples, BF and culture detected 285 and 142 potential pathogens, respectively. Positive percent agreement (PPA) was 88% (125/142). In patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), clinical sensitivity was 70% and 51%, and specificity was 43% and 71% for BF and culture, respectively. In patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia, the corresponding numbers were 55% and 23%, and 47% and 68%. There was no significant improvement of performance, when only high-quality sputum samples were considered. Efficacy of both BF and culture was low. Both tests are best used in CAP patients for whom the diagnosis has already been clinically established. Indiscriminate use may be clinically misleading and a cause of improper use of antibiotics.

摘要

采用生物梅里埃 FilmArray 呼吸道感染病原体检测试剂盒(BF)进行的下呼吸道感染综合征检测可在 1 小时内检测到 27 种病原体。我们将 BF 与培养法进行了比较。对 298 例疑似肺炎住院患者的常规送检培养样本也使用 BF 进行了分析。回顾性地,根据临床标准将患者分为“肺炎”或“非肺炎”。BF 和培养法的性能比较采用病原体一致性分析,通过比较肺炎患者和非肺炎患者的病原体检测情况来比较临床性能。BF 对病毒和非典型细菌的结果未包含在性能分析中。在 298 例患者样本中,BF 和培养法分别检测到 285 种和 142 种潜在病原体。阳性符合率(PPA)为 88%(125/142)。在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者中,BF 和培养法的临床灵敏度分别为 70%和 51%,特异性分别为 43%和 71%。在医院获得性肺炎患者中,相应的数字分别为 55%和 23%,47%和 68%。当仅考虑高质量痰液样本时,性能没有显著提高。BF 和培养法的疗效均较低。这两种检测方法最适用于已经通过临床诊断确定为 CAP 患者。不加区分的使用可能会在临床上产生误导,并导致抗生素的不当使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验