• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人前列腺切除术中超低与标准气腹的随机试验。

Randomized Trial of Ultralow vs Standard Pneumoperitoneum during Robotic Prostatectomy.

机构信息

Central Ohio Urology Group, Columbus, Ohio.

Mount Carmel St. Ann's Hospital Prostate Cancer Program, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

J Urol. 2022 Sep;208(3):626-632. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002729. Epub 2022 May 2.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000002729
PMID:35499481
Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic and robotic surgery have traditionally been performed with pneumoperitoneum of 12-15 mmHg. Based upon our previous retrospective study showing an advantage to using ultralow pneumoperitoneum during robotic prostatectomy (RP), we performed a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial of RP at 6 mmHg vs 15 mmHg to assess postoperative pain and opioid use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing RP with lymphadenectomy by a single surgeon were randomized to pneumoperitoneum pressures of 6 mmHg vs 15 mmHg. Pain scores and opioid use were recorded every 2 hours until discharge. Groups underwent intention-to-treat analysis on the primary outcome of pain scores up to 8 hours after post-anesthesia care unit.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were randomized to RP at 6 mmHg or 15 mmHg (67 and 71, respectively). Mean console time was 7 minutes longer at 6 mmHg (135 vs 128 minutes, p=0.02). Mean estimated blood loss was similar (p=0.4) with no transfusions in either group. Most patients were discharged on the same day as surgery (88% vs 84%, p=0.5). There was no statistically significant difference observed in morphine equivalents administered during surgery or used postoperatively, yet 6 mmHg patients had lower immediate (0-4 hours) mean pain scores (2.1 vs 3.5, p <0.01) and lower maximum pain scores (3.0 vs 5.2, p <0.01). Shoulder pain was lower in 6 mmHg patients (0.03 vs 0.15, p=0.01), as was groin pain (0.6 vs 1.2 p=0.01). Patients reported flatus earlier with 6 mmHg (mean 1.0 day vs 1.3 days, p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumoperitoneum pressure of 6 mmHg during RP has several advantages over the commonly used level of 15 mmHg without any identified disadvantages. Surgeons should consider using lower insufflation pressures.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜和机器人手术传统上采用 12-15mmHg 的气腹压力。基于我们之前的回顾性研究表明在机器人前列腺切除术(RP)中使用超低气腹压力有优势,我们进行了一项随机、双盲、对照试验,比较了 6mmHg 与 15mmHg 气腹压力在 RP 中的应用,以评估术后疼痛和阿片类药物的使用情况。

材料与方法

由同一位外科医生对接受淋巴结清扫术的 RP 患者进行随机分组,气腹压力分别为 6mmHg 和 15mmHg。记录每 2 小时的疼痛评分和阿片类药物使用情况,直到出院。两组均按意向治疗分析主要结局(麻醉后护理单元后 8 小时内的疼痛评分)。

结果

共有 138 例患者被随机分为 6mmHg 或 15mmHg 组(分别为 67 例和 71 例)。6mmHg 组的控制台时间平均延长 7 分钟(135 分钟与 128 分钟,p=0.02)。两组的平均估计失血量相似(p=0.4),均无输血。大多数患者在同一天出院(88%与 84%,p=0.5)。术中或术后使用的吗啡等效物无统计学差异,但 6mmHg 组的即刻(0-4 小时)平均疼痛评分较低(2.1 与 3.5,p<0.01),最大疼痛评分较低(3.0 与 5.2,p<0.01)。6mmHg 组的肩部疼痛较低(0.03 与 0.15,p=0.01),腹股沟疼痛也较低(0.6 与 1.2,p=0.01)。6mmHg 组患者更早排气(平均 1.0 天与 1.3 天,p<0.01)。

结论

RP 中使用 6mmHg 的气腹压力优于常用的 15mmHg 水平,且无任何明显的不利影响。外科医生应考虑使用较低的充气压力。

相似文献

1
Randomized Trial of Ultralow vs Standard Pneumoperitoneum during Robotic Prostatectomy.机器人前列腺切除术中超低与标准气腹的随机试验。
J Urol. 2022 Sep;208(3):626-632. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002729. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
Impact of pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术中气腹压力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jan;280:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.11.011. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
Feasibility of robot-assisted prostatectomy performed at ultra-low pneumoperitoneum pressure of 6 mmHg and comparison of clinical outcomes vs standard pressure of 15 mmHg.在超低气腹压力 6mmHg 下进行机器人辅助前列腺切除术的可行性,以及与标准压力 15mmHg 的临床结果比较。
BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):308-313. doi: 10.1111/bju.14682. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Comparison of valve-less and standard insufflation on pneumoperitoneum-related complications in robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective randomized trial.无阀与标准注气法在机器人辅助部分肾切除术中气腹相关并发症比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01117-z. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Randomized Controlled Comparison of Valveless Trocar (AirSeal) Standard Insufflator with Ultralow Pneuomoperitoneum During Robotic Prostatectomy.随机对照比较研究:在机器人前列腺切除术中,无瓣套管(AirSeal)与超低气腹压力标准注气设备的比较。
J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):1020-1024. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1025. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Re: Randomized Trial of Ultralow vs Standard Pneumoperitoneum during Robotic Prostatectomy.关于:机器人辅助前列腺切除术中超低气腹与标准气腹的随机试验
Eur Urol. 2023 Mar;83(3):295. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
The impact of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double blinded trial.低压气腹对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2469-2474. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03486-4. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
8
Anesthesiological and surgical perspectives on using 8 mmHg versus 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic radical prostatectomy: Results of a prospective randomized study.在机器人根治性前列腺切除术期间使用 8 mmHg 与 12 mmHg 气腹压力的麻醉学和手术学观点:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):430-436. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.78617.
9
The impact of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy II: a prospective, randomized, double blinded trial.低压气腹对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的影响 II:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
World J Urol. 2024 May 24;42(1):347. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05038-6.
10
Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery.少即是多:机器人手术中降低气腹压力的临床影响。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):299-307. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01104-4. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Low- Versus Standard-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum on Postoperative Recovery in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.低压力与标准压力气腹对肥胖患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后恢复的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 10;61(7):1253. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071253.
2
Impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on post-operative pain in robotic urological surgery: a systematic review.低压气腹对机器人泌尿外科手术术后疼痛的影响:一项系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 17;19(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02221-8.
3
Development of the European Laparoscopic Intermediate Urological Skills LUSs2 Curriculum: A Delphi Consensus from the European School of Urology.
欧洲腹腔镜中级泌尿外科技能LUSs2课程的开发:来自欧洲泌尿外科学校的德尔菲共识
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Sep 13;69:22-50. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.023. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Moderate Intra-Abdominal Pressure Levels in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Seem to Have No Negative Impact on Clinical Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中适度的腹内压水平似乎对临床结果没有负面影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 20;13(5):1202. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051202.