School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Aug 15;90(5):482-493. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003008.
Sexual relationship power (SRP) inequities, including having a controlling partner, have not been widely examined among women living with HIV (WLWH). We measured the prevalence and key outcomes of relationship control among WLWH in Canada.
Baseline data from WLWH (≥16 years), reporting consensual sex in the last month enrolled in a Canadian community-collaborative cohort study in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, included the relationship control SRP subscale by Pulerwitz (2000). Scale scores were dichotomized into medium/low (score = 1-2.82) vs. high relationship control (score = 2.82-4), and high scores indicate greater SRP equity. Cronbach's alpha assessed scale reliability. Bivariate analyses compared women with high vs. medium/low relationship control. Crude and adjusted multinomial regression examined associations between relationship control and condom use [consistent (ref), inconsistent, or never]; any sexual, physical, and/or emotional violence; and physical and/or sexual violence [never (ref), recent (≤3 months ago), and previous (>3 months ago)].
Overall, 473 sexually active WLWH (33% of cohort), median age = 39 (IQR = 33-46) years, 81% on antiretroviral therapy, and 78% with viral loads <50 copies/mL were included. The subscale demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). WLWH with high relationship control (80%) were more likely ( P < 0.05) to be in a relationship, have no children, have greater resilience, and report less sociostructural inequities. In adjusted models, high relationship control was associated with lower odds of inconsistent vs. consistent condom use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.39 (95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.85)], any recent violence [aOR: 0.14 (0.04-0.47)] as well as recent physical and/or sexual [aOR : 0.05 (0.02-0.17)] but not previous violence (vs. never).
Prioritizing relationship equity and support for WLWH is critical for addressing violence and promoting positive health outcomes.
性伴侣权力(SRP)不平等,包括伴侣控制,在感染艾滋病毒的妇女(WLWH)中尚未得到广泛研究。我们衡量了加拿大 WLWH 中关系控制的流行程度和关键结果。
不列颠哥伦比亚省、安大略省和魁北克省参与加拿大社区合作队列研究的符合条件的 WLWH(≥16 岁)报告了上个月的自愿性行为,包括 Pulerwitz(2000 年)的关系控制 SRP 子量表。量表评分分为中等/低(评分= 1-2.82)与高关系控制(评分= 2.82-4),高分表示 SRP 公平性更高。克朗巴赫的 alpha 评估了量表的可靠性。双变量分析比较了高关系控制与中/低关系控制的女性。未调整和调整的多项回归检验了关系控制与 condom 使用之间的关联[一致(参考)、不一致或从不];任何性、身体和/或情感暴力;以及身体和/或性暴力[从不(参考)、最近(≤3 个月前)和以前(>3 个月前)]。
总体而言,473 名活跃的 WLWH(队列的 33%),中位年龄为 39 岁(IQR=33-46 岁),81%接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,78%病毒载量<50 拷贝/ml 被纳入。该量表具有良好的可靠性(克朗巴赫的 alpha=0.92)。具有高关系控制(80%)的 WLWH 更有可能(P<0.05)处于关系中,没有孩子,具有更大的适应力,报告的社会结构不平等程度较低。在调整后的模型中,高关系控制与不一致使用 condom 与一致使用 condom 的可能性较低相关[调整后的优势比(aOR):0.39(95%置信区间:0.18 至 0.85)],最近任何暴力[aOR:0.14(0.04 至 0.47)]以及最近的身体和/或性暴力[aOR:0.05(0.02 至 0.17)],但不包括以前的暴力(与从不相比)。
优先考虑 WLWH 的关系公平性和支持对于解决暴力问题和促进健康结果至关重要。