• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种评估临床医生使用患者决策辅助工具态度的形容词选择量表:ADOPT 量表。

Development of an adjective-selection measure evaluating clinicians' attitudes towards using patient decision aids: The ADOPT measure.

机构信息

Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Netherlands.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Aug;105(8):2785-2792. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.002
PMID:35501228
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The implementation of shared decision-making and patient decision aids (PDAs) is impeded by clinicians' attitudes.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a measure of clinician attitude towards PDAs.

METHODS

To develop the ADOPT measure, we used four stages, culminating in measure responses by medically qualified clinicians, 25 from each of the following specialties: emergency medicine, family medicine, oncology, obstetrics and gynaecology, orthopaedics, and psychiatry. To assess validity, we also posed three questions to assess the participants' attitudinal and behavioural endorsement of PDAs. Allocating a point per adjective, we calculated the sum as well as positive and negative scores. We used univariate logistic regression to determine associations between the scores and attitudinal or behavioural endorsements.

RESULTS

152 clinicians completed the measure. 'Time-saving' (39%) and 'easy' (34%) were the most frequently selected adjectives. 'Time-consuming' and 'unfamiliar' were the most frequently selected negative adjectives (both 19%). The sum scores were significantly associated with behavioural endorsement of PDAs.

DISCUSSION

Clinicians were able to respond to adjective-selection methods and the ADOPT measure could help assess clinician attitudes to PDAs. Validation will require further research.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The ADOPT measure could help identify the extent and source of attitudinal resistance.

摘要

背景

共享决策和患者决策辅助工具(PDAs)的实施受到临床医生态度的阻碍。

目的

开发一种衡量临床医生对 PDAs 态度的工具。

方法

为了开发 ADOPT 工具,我们使用了四个阶段,最终由以下每个专业的医学合格临床医生回答:急诊医学、家庭医学、肿瘤学、妇产科、骨科和精神病学,各 25 名。为了评估有效性,我们还提出了三个问题来评估参与者对 PDAs 的态度和行为认可。我们为每个形容词分配一个点,计算总和以及正负分数。我们使用单变量逻辑回归来确定分数与态度或行为认可之间的关联。

结果

152 名临床医生完成了该测量。“节省时间”(39%)和“简单”(34%)是最常被选择的形容词。“耗时”和“不熟悉”是最常被选择的负面形容词(均为 19%)。总分与 PDAs 的行为认可显著相关。

讨论

临床医生能够对形容词选择方法做出反应,ADOPT 工具可以帮助评估临床医生对 PDAs 的态度。验证还需要进一步的研究。

实践意义

ADOPT 工具可以帮助确定态度抵制的程度和来源。

相似文献

1
Development of an adjective-selection measure evaluating clinicians' attitudes towards using patient decision aids: The ADOPT measure.开发一种评估临床医生使用患者决策辅助工具态度的形容词选择量表:ADOPT 量表。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Aug;105(8):2785-2792. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Implementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol.在五个组织环境中实施子宫肌瘤选项网格患者决策辅助工具:一项随机阶梯式楔形研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Sep 2;14(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0933-z.
3
Clinicians' perceptions of digital vs. paper-based decision support interventions.临床医生对数字与纸质决策支持干预措施的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;21(2):175-9. doi: 10.1111/jep.12269. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: a mixed methods implementation study.为帮助临床医生与患者进行共同决策而准备的证据总结(决策框):一项混合方法实施研究。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 5;9:144. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0144-6.
5
Cancer patients' perspective on shared decision-making and decision aids in oncology.癌症患者对肿瘤学中共同决策和决策辅助的看法。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;147(6):1725-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03579-6. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
6
Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.实现参与:一项关于全科医疗中共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验的过程结果
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):337-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401.
7
US-based cross-sectional survey of clinicians' knowledge and attitudes about shared decision-making across healthcare professions and specialties.针对美国临床医生关于跨医疗行业和专业的共同决策的知识与态度开展的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e022730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022730.
8
Exploring the use of Option Grid™ patient decision aids in a sample of clinics in Poland.在波兰的一组诊所中探索使用Option Grid™患者决策辅助工具。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Jul;134:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.探索医疗服务提供者对决策辅助工具分发及共同决策的反应:来自两个专业领域的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Pragmatic Study of Clinician Use of a Personalized Patient Decision Aid Integrated into the Electronic Health Record: An 8-Year Experience.临床医生使用集成到电子健康记录中的个性化患者决策辅助工具的实用研究:八年经验
Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):597-602. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0112. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The UPFRONT project: tailored implementation and evaluation of a patient decision aid to support shared decision-making about management of symptomatic uterine fibroids.UPFRONT 项目:定制实施和评估患者决策辅助工具,以支持关于症状性子宫肌瘤管理的共同决策。
Implement Sci. 2024 Nov 5;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01404-5.
2
Exploring the MAPPING application to facilitate risk communication and shared decision-making between physicians and patients with gynaecological cancer.探索 MAPPING 应用程序,以促进妇科癌症患者与医生之间的风险沟通和共同决策。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Aug 19;13(3):e002776. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002776.
3
Unravelling clinicians' shared decision-making adoption: a qualitative exploration through the lens of diffusion of innovations theory.
揭示临床医生共同决策采纳的过程:通过创新扩散理论的视角进行定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 21;14(6):e080765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080765.
4
The impact of adding cost information to a conversation aid to support shared decision making about low-risk prostate cancer treatment: Results of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.为支持关于低危前列腺癌治疗的共享决策,在辅助沟通工具中添加成本信息对其的影响:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):2023-2039. doi: 10.1111/hex.13810. Epub 2023 Jul 2.