Suppr超能文献

通过连续咳嗽动作对盆腔器官脱垂进行临床评估。

Clinical assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by consecutive cough maneuver.

作者信息

Pacquée S, Dietz H P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Neonatology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, 62 Derby Street, Kingswood, NSW, 2747, Australia.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):185-190. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05208-3. Epub 2022 May 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Staging of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is important in clinical practice and research. Pelvic organ descent on Valsalva can be confounded by levator co-activation, which may be avoided by assessment on coughing. We evaluated the performance of a three consecutive coughs maneuver in the assessment of POP compared with standardised 6-second Valsalva.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study carried out in women attending a tertiary urogynaecological service in 2017-2019. Patients underwent a standardised interview and clinical examination. Clinical assessment was performed twice, with both 6-s Valsalva and three consecutive coughs performed in random order. Main outcomes were Ba, C and Bp as defined by Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q). Association between coordinates and prolapse symptoms was investigated with receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) statistics.

RESULTS

Datasets of 855 women were analysed. POP symptoms were reported by 447 patients (52%) with a mean bother of 6.1 (SD 3.0). On clinical assessment, relevant prolapse was found in 716 (84%) patients on Valsalva and in 730 (85%) on coughing (p=0.109). Clinically relevant prolapse in the apical compartment was more likely to be detected on Valsalva (p<0.0001). Mean POP-Q measurements were not significantly different between maneuvers, except for Ba (p=0.004). ROC curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.70-0.77) for maximum POP-Q stage on Valsalva and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) after three consecutive coughs, with a similar performance of both maneuvers in predicting prolapse symptoms (p=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical assessment of POP by consecutive coughing seems complementary to standardised Valsalva, especially if Valsalva performance is poor.

摘要

引言与假设

盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的分期在临床实践和研究中很重要。用力屏气时盆腔器官下降可能会因提肛肌共同激活而混淆,通过咳嗽评估可避免这种情况。我们评估了连续三次咳嗽动作在POP评估中的表现,并与标准化的6秒用力屏气进行比较。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,于2017 - 2019年在一家三级泌尿妇科服务机构就诊的女性中开展。患者接受了标准化访谈和临床检查。临床评估进行了两次,6秒用力屏气和连续三次咳嗽以随机顺序进行。主要结局指标为盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)定义的Ba、C和Bp。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)统计分析坐标与脱垂症状之间的关联。

结果

分析了855名女性的数据集。447例患者(52%)报告有POP症状,平均困扰程度为6.1(标准差3.0)。临床评估时,用力屏气时716例(84%)患者发现有相关脱垂,咳嗽时730例(85%)患者发现有相关脱垂(p = 0.109)。在顶端区域,临床上相关的脱垂在用力屏气时更易被检测到(p < 0.0001)。除Ba外,各动作间平均POP-Q测量值无显著差异(p = 0.004)。ROC曲线分析显示,用力屏气时最大POP-Q分期的曲线下面积为0.74(95%可信区间,0.70 - 0.77),连续三次咳嗽后为0.72(95%可信区间,0.69 - 0.75),两种动作在预测脱垂症状方面表现相似(p = 0.95)。

结论

通过连续咳嗽对POP进行临床评估似乎是对标准化用力屏气的补充,尤其是在用力屏气表现不佳时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验