Suppr超能文献

一项探索 2 型糖尿病成人参加结构化教育计划障碍的定性研究。

A qualitative study exploring the barriers to attending structured education programmes among adults with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Present Address: Public Health and Preventative Services, Bath and North East Somerset Council, Keynsham Civic Centre, Market Walk, Keynsham, BS31 1FS, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07980-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes self-management education, a universally recommended component of diabetes care, aims to support self-management in people with type 2 diabetes. However, attendance is low (approx. 10%). Previous research investigating the reasons for low attendance have not yet linked findings to theory, making it difficult to translate findings into practice. This study explores why some adults with type 2 diabetes do not attend diabetes self-management education and considers how services can be adapted accordingly, using Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Service Utilisation as a framework.

METHODS

A cross-sectional semi-structured qualitative interview study was carried out. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone with 14 adults with type 2 diabetes who had verbally declined their invitation to attend diabetes self-management education in Bath and North East Somerset, UK, within the last 2 years. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis before mapping the themes onto the factors of Andersen's Behavioural Model.

RESULTS

Two main themes were identified: 'perceived need' and 'practical barriers'. The former theme explored participants' tendency to decline diabetes education when they perceived they did not need the programme. This perception tended to arise from participants' high self-efficacy to manage their type 2 diabetes, the low priority they attributed to their condition and limited knowledge about the programme. The latter theme, 'practical barriers', explored the notion that some participants wanted to attend but were unable to due to other commitments and/or transportation issues in getting to the venue.

CONCLUSIONS

All sub-themes resonated with one or more factors of Andersen's Behavioural Model indicating that the model may help to elucidate attendance barriers and ways to improve services. To fully understand low attendance to diabetes education, the complex and individualised reasons for non-attendance must be recognised and a person-centred approach should be taken to understand people's experience, needs and capabilities.

摘要

背景

糖尿病自我管理教育是糖尿病护理中普遍推荐的一项内容,旨在帮助 2 型糖尿病患者进行自我管理。然而,参与率却很低(约为 10%)。之前的研究调查了参与率低的原因,但尚未将研究结果与理论联系起来,因此难以将研究结果转化为实践。本研究旨在探讨为什么一些 2 型糖尿病患者不参加糖尿病自我管理教育,并考虑如何相应地调整服务,以 Andersen 的健康服务利用行为模型为框架。

方法

采用横断面半结构式定性访谈研究。对英国巴斯和东北萨默塞特地区最近 2 年内口头拒绝参加糖尿病自我管理教育的 14 名 2 型糖尿病患者进行了电话半结构式访谈。采用归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析,然后将主题映射到 Andersen 行为模型的因素上。

结果

确定了两个主要主题:“感知需求”和“实际障碍”。前者主题探讨了参与者在感知自己不需要该项目时倾向于拒绝糖尿病教育。这种看法往往源于参与者对自己管理 2 型糖尿病的高自我效能感、对自己病情的低优先级以及对该项目的有限了解。后者主题“实际障碍”探讨了一些参与者有参加的意愿,但由于其他承诺和/或交通问题而无法参加的情况。

结论

所有子主题都与 Andersen 行为模型的一个或多个因素产生共鸣,这表明该模型可能有助于阐明参与障碍和改进服务的方法。为了充分了解糖尿病教育参与率低的原因,必须认识到非参与的复杂和个体化原因,并采取以患者为中心的方法来了解患者的体验、需求和能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab5/9063340/cfefeaded071/12913_2022_7980_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验